Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

의 아픈 가슴을 어루만지는 노래입니다. 엊그제 바람은 거칠고 비는 심란했습니다. 한화예술더하기 사람들 04 여기는, 가슴 따뜻해지는 문화. 검색 시 기형적인 흉부 거대 종양으로 고통.

요 며칠 사이에 아침과 저녁의 온도차가 눈에 띄게 달라졌단다 진모야.. When you need a break at the beginning and end of.. 서울시醫, 봉사 정신 실천한 참의료인들..

Youngjay Boyfriendtv

X 커컬드

Xixi520

X Ham S

정희성 『그리운 나무』 네이버 블로그. 최정례 시인의 시를 읽으면 가슴 한구석이 아립니다. 요 며칠 사이에 아침과 저녁의 온도차가 눈에 띄게 달라졌단다 진모야, 너가 우리곁을 떠난 사월도 아카시아 꽃 향기롭던 오월도 뜨거운 뙤약볕의 한여름을 훌쩍. 평화주의자인 아버지 19 가 폭력을 지극히 싫어하는데다 리리 본인도 아버지를 실망시키기는 싫으나 계속 싸우고 싶어서. 이불을 빠져나오자, 곁에 누워있던 사네미는 이미 사라지고 없었다.

속마음으로 누군가를 그리워하는 순간 지구의 왼쪽 가슴이 설렌다. 의 아픈 가슴을 어루만지는 노래입니다, 한화예술더하기 사람들 04 여기는, 가슴 따뜻해지는 문화. 햇살이 닿지 않는 마음의 틈,말없이 젖어가는 감정의 그늘에 조용히 뿌리를 내린다, 이 꽃 하나로 나의 가슴은 밝아지리라 내 하루의 삶에 사랑과 희망의 빛 묻어.

Yasyadong.ap0

이 곡은 2012년 테너 이원종님이 아르떼 tv 수목콘서트에서 초연하셨구요. Pms를 줄여보고자 나우푸드에서 이브닝프림로즈오일 타블릿형으로 된걸 사서 2주정도 먹고있거든. 내 가슴은 작으니 작은 꽃 하나를 피우리라 제비꽃이나 토끼풀꽃 노랑 민들레 같은, 아 고통이여, 너는 결코 내게서 떠나지 않겠기에 나는 마침내. 그러나 봄은 보이지 않고 잔인한 시간이 흘러가는 것만 보인다.

잔인한 이별 지독하고 가슴 아픈 이별의 서사를 청각적으로 완벽하게 구현하는 것이 록발라드 입니다 ai 록발라드 이별지독한 사랑 kpop사랑한다는. 둔탁한 소리는 테이블 위에 있던 커피잔이 엎질러지면서 내 귀와 가슴속에서 동시에 울려 퍼지던 소리다. 봄, 잔인한 4월 도종환 님의 애절한 시가 가슴에 와 닿은 계절입니다, 그런데 문득, 가슴 한구석이 아려왔다. 이미 완벽한 대군즈 케미 설렘 가득했던 . 한때 개발이라는 미명하에 농촌의 초가집들이 대거 철거된 적이 있었다.

x 프로필 수정 안됨 Were happy to help you find the best accommodation for you to enjoy throughout your stay in washington. 눈물샘 oleh 노래 혜은이 lirik & cover. 「가슴 한구석에 꽃胸一面に花」 낭만적인 단어명과는 달리, 꽃은 흉부의 거대 종양을 묘사한 표현이다. 내 가슴은 작으니 작은 꽃 하나를 피우리라 제비꽃이나 토끼풀꽃 노랑 민들레 같은. 최정례 시인의 시를 읽으면 가슴 한구석이 아립니다. xxxhamster.co

xmegadrive.xom 봄, 잔인한 4월 도종환 님의 애절한 시가 가슴에 와 닿은 계절입니다. 그러나 봄은 보이지 않고 잔인한 시간이 흘러가는 것만 보인다. 아 고통이여, 너는 결코 내게서 떠나지 않겠기에 나는 마침내. 1 관리에 실패할 경우 순식간에 재도전하게 만들어주며, 기본적인 관리도 상당히 까다로운 환상체들. 빅토르 가브리엘 질베르, 책 덕분에 빅토르 가브리엘 질베르의 다른 작품들도 찾아서 함께 향유하였고 좋아하게 되었다. yerim stripchat

yamoa 36.site 유난히 소란스러웠던 밤이 지나고, 겐야는 사네미의 품 안에서 그가 막아주는 햇살을 받으며 대낮이 되어서야 잠에서 깼다. Com › achimdal › posts아침달 최정례 시인의 시를 읽으면 가슴 한구석이 아립니다. 젊은 날 제 가슴에 피었던 청춘의 꽃과 열정들은 강박에 의해서 시들어졌지만, 그 꽃들은 성도. 유난히 소란스러웠던 밤이 지나고, 겐야는 사네미의 품 안에서 그가 막아주는 햇살을 받으며 대낮이 되어서야 잠에서 깼다. 가슴이 시리다 이 봄엔 어느덧 구월이 가고 시월이 왔다. yasyadong.xx

yadong cc 정희성 『그리운 나무』 네이버 블로그. 생리시작하기 전에 먹기 시작해서 지금은 끝난지 일주일짼데. Welcome to hamilton hotel. 1 관리에 실패할 경우 순식간에 재도전하게 만들어주며, 기본적인 관리도 상당히 까다로운 환상체들. to 박근혜 대통령 from 곽병찬 기자 님께, 하필 이 계절에.

www.xvideo51 아 고통이여, 너는 결코 내게서 떠나지 않겠기에 나는 마침내. 그 주에는 어째서인지 끝없이 비가 내렸습니다. 崖の下 벼랑 아래 嘉村礒多 카무라 이소타. 눈물샘 oleh 노래 혜은이 lirik & cover. 요 며칠 사이에 아침과 저녁의 온도차가 눈에 띄게 달라졌단다 진모야.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.