Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

Lounge description 글리제 977를 이용하시는 모든 고객님들을 위한 멋진 공간으로 시원한 담양호를 감상하시면서 편안하게 휴식을 취하실 수 있는 라운지입니다. 바베큐 구워드리는 시간은 6시반8시까지입니다. 글리제977에 도착하면 차가운 공기 속에서도 따뜻한 숨이 먼저 쉬어집니다. 침구가 푹신하고 편해서 잠이 잘 왔고.

짹창

A place where comfort and excitement coexist.. 담양호를 끼고 있어서 담양호를 따라 산책하거나 크고 한적한 빠지가 있어서 웨이크보드나 수상스키를 타기에도 좋은 곳이었다.. 담양 감성숙소 글리제977 305호 내돈내산 후기 룸서비스.. 한달 전 떠난 친구들과의 1박2일 여행 미루고 미루다 ㅋㅋㅋ 이제야 포스팅합니다 🤣 루프탑 수영장이 있..

시원한 수영장에서 더위를 식히고, 저녁에는 바베큐 시설에서 맛있는 식사를 즐길 수 있습니다. 127,360원즉시할인가 결제수단 즉시 할인 안내창 열기 전남 담양군 용면 추월산로 9773. Com › ko58444 › 224037539467담양 감성숙소 추천 글리제 977 304호 네이버 블로그, Com › mcjuliet1106 › 223358941164담양 감성숙소 글리제977 301호 숙박후기 네이버 블로그.

주미온의 부름 후편

개인정보처리방침 상호명 글리제977 대표자 진덕준 주소 전남 담양군 용면 추월산로 9773 사업자등록번호 43 통신판매업신고번호 2013전남담양00013 개인정보관리책임자 진덕준 관리자이메일 gliese977@naver. 😄 멀리서부터 건물 벽에 대문짝만하게 붙. Com › stomp100 › 222878083209담양 감성 럭셔리 숙소 완전 만족스러웠던 담양 글리제977. ❄️ 글리제977의 겨울 이야기 겨울의 담양은 소란스럽지. 10 likes, 0 comments gliese977_ on j 산들바람이 볼에 스치는 느낌이 아주 좋은 아침입니다.

Com › tteulbi › 223201136865담양 감성 숙소 글리제977 네이버 블로그. ❄️ 글리제977의 겨울 이야기 겨울의 담양은 소란스럽지. 담양글리제977 글리제977 담양숙소 담양펜션 담양럭셔리숙소. 담양이 처음인 가족들과 담양 여행을 하기 좋은 위치였답니다. Lounge description 글리제 977를 이용하시는 모든 고객님들을 위한 멋진 공간으로 시원한 담양호를 감상하시면서 편안하게 휴식을 취하실 수 있는 라운지입니다, 담양글리제977 글리제977 담양숙소 담양펜션 담양럭셔리숙소.

중국 일진 디시

글리제977은 담양호 국민관광지 주차장을 이용하거나 카페 글리제 앞 오르막길에 올라오면 주차장이 있어요 오르막길 올라와서 주차하면 로비가 바로 앞이라 짐을 옮기기편한 카페쪽에 주차 추천, 오늘도 무더울것 같지만 시원하게 잘 지내 보아요😻 담양펜션 담양글리제977 담양. Com › contentrooms gliese 977. 395 followers 0 threads 담양호의 청량한 자연과 함께 휴식을 경험하실수 있는 글리제977입니다, 전남 담양 담양 글리제977 여행 g마켓.

짤랑이코인 밴드 ❄️ 글리제977의 겨울 이야기 겨울의 담양은 소란스럽지. Lounge description 글리제 977를 이용하시는 모든 고객님들을 위한 멋진 공간으로 시원한 담양호를 감상하시면서 편안하게 휴식을 취하실 수 있는 라운지입니다. Likes, 0 comments gliese977_ on j 여긴, 하늘과 가장 가까운 수영장 햇살 아래 반짝이는 물결, 글리제977 루프탑 수영장에서 오늘 하루를 채워보세요. 객실별 서비스 및 가격 비교도 쉽고 빠르게 가능해요. 분위기가 정말 좋고 감성숙소로 아주 딱이었던 담양 글리제977. 지 디스크 정로

짤랑e 옷정리 담양 글리제977 전남 담양군에서 아이와 갈 곳 추천. 담양글리제977 글리제977 담양숙소 담양펜션 담양럭셔리숙소. Com › yum_b › 223236209690담양 감성숙소 글리제977 305호 내돈내산 후기 룸서비스, 주차. 담양 감성숙소 글리제977, 객실이 깨끗하고 편의시설이 많아서 좋았고요. 판매정보 통신판매업 신고번호 제 2025충남아산0167 호 관광사업등록번호 제 2002000002호. 지젤 얼싸

주술회전 마키 죽음 Com › yum_b › 223236209690담양 감성숙소 글리제977 305호 내돈내산 후기 룸서비스, 주차 네. 숙소가 너무나도 이뻐서 밖으로 돌아다니고 싶지 않을 정도로 그림같이 이쁜 숙소에서 묵고 왔어요. 담양이 처음인 가족들과 담양 여행을 하기 좋은 위치였답니다. 감각적인 인테리어,아늑한 침대,그리고 프라이빗한 힐링을 위한 완벽한 공간. 감성 숙소 구공 스테이 모든 거래에 대한 책임과 취소, 환불, 민원 등의 처리는 주식회사 구공스테이 에서 진행합니다. 중국 일진 야동

증바람 세트 디시 깨끗하고 쾌적한 환경을 제공하며, 아기와 함께하는 가족 단위 여행객에게 적합한 서비스를 갖추고 있습니다. 루프탑 바베큐도 가능하고, 수영장도 있어서. 그리고, 무엇보다 부모님을 비롯하여 가족 모두가 이 곳에서 보낸 시간들에 너무너무 만족해서 정말 소중하고 즐거운 추억을 남길 수 있었음. 담양 감성숙소 글리제977, 객실이 깨끗하고 편의시설이 많아서 좋았고요. 주변 경치가 아름다워 산책하기 좋은 위치에 있으며, 다양한 read more.

짧머 디시 전남 담양 담양 글리제977 여행 g마켓. 담양 글리제977의 체크인 및 체크아웃 시간은 언제인가요. 판매정보 통신판매업 신고번호 제 2025충남아산0167 호 관광사업등록번호 제 2002000002호. 글리제977은 담양호 국민관광지 주차장을 이용하거나 카페 글리제 앞 오르막길에 올라오면 주차장이 있어요 오르막길 올라와서 주차하면 로비가 바로 앞이라 짐을 옮기기편한 카페쪽에 주차 추천. Com › yum_b › 223236209690담양 감성숙소 글리제977 305호 내돈내산 후기 룸서비스, 주차.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.