Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

그래서 더욱 유명해진 영화이기도 하다. Net › humornara › 5y6유머나라 기니어피그2혈육의꽃 영화스틸컷 daum 카페. ㄷㄷ 보니깐 뺨도 때리고 고막도 터트리고 눈알도 찌른다고하던데 ㄹㅇ임. Net › humornara › 5y6유머나라 기니어피그2혈육의꽃 영화스틸컷 daum 카페.

기니어피그는 고어영화의 대표작으로불리우는 일본영화이고 시리즈가있는데 그중 위짤인 2탄 혈육의꽃이 가장잔인하고 리얼하다.. 솔직히 월만갤러라면 기니어피그 2 혈육의 꽃은 봐줘야지.. 그래서 더욱 유명해진 영화이기도 하다..

미주마갤

미타니 아카네 팬트리

무토우아야카

전부 감독한건 아니고 혈육의 꽃이랑 맨홀속의 인어만.. 일반 기니어피그 혈육의 꽃 같은 영화는 왜 만드는거임.. Com › board › view방금 본 영화 기니어피그 혈육의 꽃 201910202110 만화 갤러리.. 어느 일본 대기업의 퇴근길 복지 수준..

일본의 기니어 피그 시리즈 중 가장 화제가된 작품입니다. 기니어피그2혈육의꽃 영화스틸컷 공포체험, 마블 코믹스, sf, 한국영화29 등은 선호하지 않는 것으로 보인다. ㄷㄷ 보니깐 뺨도 때리고 고막도 터트리고 눈알도 찌른다고하던데 ㄹㅇ임. 드디어 오랫동안 보고싶었던 혈육의꽃 을 보고왔습니다.

매우 조잡하고 저질스런 화질임에도 불구하고 아직까지도 블로그 검색어1위의 자리를 차지하고 있는 기니어 피그시리즈2 혈육의꽃은 고어영화의 입문에 있어서 꼭 한번은 봐야할 영화일것이다. 일단 이런류의 영상을 별로 안조아하시거나 본적없는분 또는 주위에서 말만듣고 어떨까하는 생각에 한번 보시려는분들은 절대로 보지말것을 강력히 권유합니다저도 오픈케이스란에서 dvd올라온거랑 덧글보고 어렵게 구해봤는데 어느정도 예상은하고봤지만 적나라한 영상에 할말을 잊었습니다, Com › munbom2 › 223754570785고어영화 등급표 기니어 피그 2 혈육의 꽃 후기 네이버 블로그, Net › humornara › 5y6유머나라 기니어피그2혈육의꽃 영화스틸컷 daum 카페. 고어영화발굴2혈육의꽃 카툰연재 갤러리.

미나미 아이리 온리팬스 그래서 더욱 유명해진 영화이기도 하다. 기니어피그는 고어영화의 대표작으로불리우는 일본영화이고 시리즈가있는데 그중 위짤인 2탄 혈육의꽃이 가장잔인하고 리얼하다. 기니어피그는 고어영화의 대표작으로불리우는 일본영화이고 시리즈가있는데 그중 위짤인 2탄 혈육의꽃이 가장잔인하고 리얼하다. Com › board › view방금 본 영화 기니어피그 혈육의 꽃 201910202110 만화 갤러리. 혈육의꽃하고 악마의실험맨홀까지 저도 봤는데 많은분들이 이세작품만 추천하더군요. 묶는 만화

미타니 아카리 품번 추천 일단 이런류의 영상을 별로 안조아하시거나 본적없는분 또는 주위에서 말만듣고 어떨까하는 생각에 한번 보시려는분들은 절대로 보지말것을 강력히 권유합니다저도 오픈케이스란에서 dvd올라온거랑 덧글보고 어렵게 구해봤는데 어느정도 예상은하고봤지만 적나라한 영상에 할말을 잊었습니다. 영화 포스터부터 흑발의 인어가 짙은 녹색 피부를 띠며 일그러진 표정을 하고 있는 모습이라. 한 89년전에 유행했던영상이 기니어피그2혈육의 꽃 이랑 국물시리즈. 그래서 더욱 유명해진 영화이기도 하다. 혈육의 꽃 그냥 아무내용없음 그냥 사지분열. 민지 피지컬 디시

무협야동 매우 조잡하고 저질스런 화질임에도 불구하고 아직까지도 블로그 검색어1위의 자리를 차지하고 있는 기니어 피그시리즈2 혈육의꽃은 고어영화의 입문에 있어서 꼭 한번은 봐야할 영화일것이다. 마블 코믹스, sf, 한국영화29 등은 선호하지 않는 것으로 보인다. 한 89년전에 유행했던영상이 기니어피그2혈육의 꽃 이랑 국물시리즈. 솔직히 월만갤러라면 기니어피그 2 혈육의 꽃은 봐줘야지. 하도 리얼하다보니 이에얽힌 해프닝 몇개가있다. 미츠리av

미츠리 허벅지 디시 일반 솔직히 월만갤러라면 기니어피그 2 혈육의 꽃은 봐줘야지. ㄷㄷ 보니깐 뺨도 때리고 고막도 터트리고 눈알도 찌른다고하던데 ㄹㅇ임. 속편이 혈육의꽃임 그후로도 재미붙여서 시리즈쭉만들엇는데 여기서중요한건 악마의실험 그영화 실제스너프다 ㅇㅇ 거기나온 여자주인공 정보는. 솔직히 월만갤러라면 기니어피그 2 혈육의 꽃은 봐줘야지. 그래서 더욱 유명해진 영화이기도 하다.

미타니아카네 품번 기니어피그 시리즈 중 제일 유명한 문제작이자 분장이 너무 리얼해서 실제 스너프 필름으로 착각해 신고 넣었다던 그 영화다 일단 지하철에 가는 한 여자를 한 남자가 납치하는 것으로 영화는 시작한다. 전부 감독한건 아니고 혈육의 꽃이랑 맨홀속의 인어만. 1980년대 후반에 나온 영화인 기니어피그 시리즈의 5편. 이외에도 2편 혈육의 꽃에서 사용되었던 피칠갑된 침대 소품이 길거리에 불법투기되어 수많은 시민들을 기겁하게 하고 경찰에 신고된 사건도 있었다. 고어영화 기니어피그에 얽힌 사건들 중세게임 마이너 갤러리.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.