Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

공개 테스트 서버를 통해서 계속해서 5. 1643 어른들에게는 추억을, 아이들에게는 행복을 선사할 극장판 포켓몬코리아의 극장판 한 줄 소개글 바로 오늘입니다. Com › fantaxiaa › 221354590219애니 포켓몬스터 20주년 극장판 너로 정했다. 2016년 12월 15일 처음으로 공개되었다.

하루나 순애

프린트 얼싸

작화 개ㅆㅅㅌㅊ 역대 영화중 최고라고 생각함 bgm도 무인 한정이 아닌 다른 세대도 사용 됨, op, ed 노래도 역대급 시작은 포켓몬 경기가 이뤄지고 read more.. 포켓몬스터 20주년 을 기념하여 귀여운 짤 포켓몬스터.. 포켓몬스터 극장판 20번째 작품이라 로고가 포켓몬스터 극장판 20이라고 박혀 있다.. 포켓몬x자이언츠 협업 상품 출시, 의류응원용품 등 출시 photo by 야구짤 야짤..

하타노 유이 디시

티젠콤부차 락앤락 세라믹텀블러 메트로카페 텀블러추천 티젠 콤부차 kombucha 시칠리아핑크레몬 다이어트 guthealth bloodsugar diet. 극장판 포켓몬스터 너로 정했다 가 개봉을 하였는데요. 첫 만남은 티격태격했지만 여행을 함께하며 둘은 우정을 쌓아. 12 likes, 0 comments mystery_poke on 피카츄가 몬스터볼에 안들어가는 이유 ㅠㅠ 극장판 포켓몬스터 너로 정했다. 포스터 분석 20주년 작품으로 포켓몬스터 1화를 리메이크 했습니다, Gm감우2018 이젠 원소반응 고로시도 막 나오겠네 6 ㅇㅇ2070 남행자 시선처리 ㅈㄴ 못하노 40 ㅇㅇ2052179 왜 신학 배꼽은 가져가 놓고 2 브루노2021 다이 담장일찐 클레 왜 없는거냐 3 페이몬볼따구2022.

피카츄의 고집 때문에 한바탕한 뒤 전설의 포켓몬 칠색조를 목격한다. 내 기억엔 파이리가 진화하면 시벌놈이 나오고 시벌놈이 진화하면 그레이트 시벌놈이 나오는거였는데. Com › @free60890 › videotiktok의 free60, 계속 좋다고 할 수밖에 없잖아요 148.

하지원 레전드 디시 2016년 12월 15일 처음으로 공개되었다. Com › community › board너로 정했다 루리웹. 20년지기 지우와 피카츄의 리얼 우정스토리 올해 마지막 영화는 너로 정했다. 1 패치를 통해 싸움꾼 조합이 생기고, 검은 왕자의 퀘스트가 진행되는 등 많은 변화가 있을 예정입니다. 하지만 90분짜리 영화로 보기에는 감정 흡입력이 강력. 하나 사키 카나 차

하치만 카톡 짤 매직 쇼핑백 손박만한 크기에 수납력은 10배 귀염뽀짝 편리한게 요술입니다💞. 20주년 기념으로 원점회귀를 내세운 리부트 작품이다. 본래 2018년 3월 31일까지 한정 발행한다고 알려졌으나, 2018년 5월에 너로 정했다. 1643 어른들에게는 추억을, 아이들에게는 행복을 선사할 극장판 포켓몬코리아의 극장판 한 줄 소개글 바로 오늘입니다. 18 온전히 그세대의 메인 포켓몬으로 스토리를 짤 수 있었던 이전 극장판과는 다르게 이번 극장판은 마샤도와는 관련이 연결고리가 없는. 한국 성인 동영상

하지훈 틱톡 하지훈 뒷계 Com › fantaxiaa › 221354590219애니 포켓몬스터 20주년 극장판 너로 정했다. 20년지기 지우와 피카츄의 리얼 우정스토리 올해 마지막 영화는 너로 정했다. 포켓몬 너로 정했다 극장판에서 가장 위화감 느껴지는 부분jpg. 포켓몬x자이언츠 협업 상품 출시, 의류응원용품 등 출시 photo by 야구짤 야짤. 저는 12기 아르세우스 초극의 시공으로 부터 극장에서 매해 챙겨봤고 10기, 11기는 tv로 봤었는데 내용은 가물가물 베스트위시 마지막 극장판인 16기 신의 속도 게노세크트, 뮤츠의 각성 이후로 극장을 좀처럼 가지 않았어요. 핑크 잠옷 라방 디시

한국야동 yasyadong 1 패치에 대한 다양한 정보들이 전달되고 있는데, 최근 공개 테스트 서버에 싸움꾼 조합과 검은 왕자에 관. 저는 12기 아르세우스 초극의 시공으로 부터 극장에서 매해 챙겨봤고 10기, 11기는 tv로 봤었는데 내용은 가물가물 베스트위시 마지막 극장판인 16기 신의 속도 게노세크트, 뮤츠의 각성 이후로 극장을 좀처럼 가지 않았어요. Com › lottecinema › posts롯시_quiz 극장판포켓몬스터너로정했다. 피카츄의 고집 때문에 한바탕한 뒤 전설의 포켓몬 칠색조를 목격한다. 티젠콤부차 락앤락 세라믹텀블러 메트로카페 텀블러추천 티젠 콤부차 kombucha 시칠리아핑크레몬 다이어트 guthealth bloodsugar diet.

한국 여자 방귀 좋아요 81개,각오빠 @gaksamav 님의 tiktok 틱톡 동영상 오늘은 너로 정했다. Tcex3ku1vc2lbrnsikumva&s19너로 정했다. Com › lottecinema › posts롯시_quiz 극장판포켓몬스터너로정했다. 로보토미 코퍼레이션 채널 뉴스 로보토미 코퍼레이션 채널 알림알림 중알림 취소구독구독 중구독 취소 구독자 19354명알림수신 456명 @ㅇㅇ. Com › fantaxiaa › 221354590219애니 포켓몬스터 20주년 극장판 너로 정했다.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.