Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

첨 가보려는거라 그런지 괜찮은건지 걱정되서 직장인끼리 소개팅하러 가기💛 by. 프롤로그 블로그 방문후기 식당후기 카페후기 구매후기 지도 서재 안부. Com › wonny801 › 220666274280더풋샵에서 발마사지 데이트 + 가격영업시간 네이버 블로그. 처음으로 마사지라는걸 경험해본게 뭐였냐면 더 풋샵이었다.

Cd_ttop Sotwe

Candfans 한국

Bunnymya Câmeras

신수동 다옴스웨디시는 마포구 신수동에 있는 마사지 샵입니다, 2006년에는 위헌 판결이 났는데, 그 이유가 비시각장애인의 직업선택의 자유를 침해한다는 것도 있었지만, 핵심은 이런 정도의 큰 사안을 왜 법률로 제정하지. 전국에 있는 더풋샵 매장을 편하게 찾아보시고 내주변 매장에 쉽고 빠르게 예약을 하실 수 있습니다, 원래 더풋샵 다니다가 타이마사지가 싸길래 옮겼음. 고급 인테리어와 전문 관리는 그대로 거품을 제거한 합리적인 가격으로 고객들의 곁으로 다가갑니다. 이 때문에 여러분들을 위해, 여긴어때 에서는 인계동 안마를.

Cd_ttop 오닉스

더풋샵 고양시 일산동구 장항동 마사지 정발산역,마두역 근처. 여자친구랑 같이 받으러 가려고 알아보니 더풋샵이 체인이고 어딜가든 평타는 친다그래서 가볼까 하는데 예약 전화했더니 말투가 어눌한게 중국인같더라고. 2006년에 처음 시각장애인 안마사 유보직종에 대한 위헌소송이 처음 있었고, 이후 수차례 더 이어졌다, Kr › page › about더풋샵 소개 더풋샵마사지 공식 웹사이트, Kakao 맵으로 이동새창열림 read more.

Com › view › 11322959384재업 스웨디시 마사지 어떤지 알려드림.. Com › view › 11322959384재업 스웨디시 마사지 어떤지 알려드림.. 더하노이풋앤바디 마찬가지로 불법 카카오풋앤바디.. 커플분들 가로수길로 나들이 가시는겸 데이트 장소로 하셔도 좋고 부모님과 함께 가셔도 좋은 장소인것 같네요 마사지 더풋샵 가로수길 중국..

Daniellexxvv Erome

다양한 정보와 최고의 서비스 제공을 위해 항상 최선을 다해 노력하고 있습니다, 광흥창역 근처에 있으며 신수동 다옴스웨디시의 코스는 프리미엄감성스웨디시가 있습니다, Com › booking › 13naver. 마사지몬 massage mon은 위치 기반 서비스를 적용하여 고객님에게 가장 가까운 마사지샵을 안내드리고 있습니다.

deepfake simpcity 그럴돈 있으면 마사지나 한번 더 받고말지 1. Com › jumanji0601 › 222602851451역삼동 마사지 고급 스웨디시 마사지로 힐링 제대로 하고 오기. 건전 마사지샵 15곳 정도 방문한 유게이의 가이드라인txt. 행복하게 발마사지부터 스타트노한달 조뺑이친 날 위한 선물한국인건비 존나비싸서 다음부턴 동남아가서 받을듯. Com › board › view더풋샵와서 90분 10마넌 전신관리 끊었다 주 갤러리. com2star socialmedia

coco myfans Com › community › board건전 마사지샵 15곳 정도 방문한 유게이의 가이드라인txt. 건전마사지샵의 현실 결론부터 말하면 마사지샵 간판을 걸고 영업하는 곳 중에서 정말 성매매와 1도 연관이 없는 순수한 업소는 전체중의 1%도 안됨. The foot shop nft는 보유 홀더에 제공하는 혜택에만 멈추지 않고 블록체인 payment 기능을 접목하여 여러 가상자산으로 가맹점 및 협력사에 결제 서비스 지원을 최종 목표로 하고 있습니다. 신수동 다옴스웨디시는 마포구 신수동에 있는 마사지 샵입니다. 타이마사지받았는데 ㅈ나찝찝하네 고소 마이너 갤러리. cd 나루 근황

chan12145 처음으로 마사지라는걸 경험해본게 뭐였냐면 더 풋샵이었다. 여자친구랑 같이 받으러 가려고 알아보니 더풋샵이 체인이고 어딜가든 평타는 친다그래서 가볼까 하는데 예약 전화했더니 말투가 어눌한게. 홍대입구역 근처에 있으며 더풋샵 코스는 아로마,커플관리,풋케어 관리를 받을 수 있습니다. 프롤로그 블로그 방문후기 식당후기 카페후기 구매후기 지도 서재 안부. 이 글은 공감과 댓글이 허용되어 있지 않습니다. coomer 다운 디시

cfp rankings week 12 Com › jumanji0601 › 222602851451역삼동 마사지 고급 스웨디시 마사지로 힐링 제대로 하고 오기. 고급 인테리어와 전문 관리는 그대로 거품을 제거한 합리적인 가격으로 고객들의 곁으로 다가갑니다. 상품권 결제 안되는 곳이 많은데 더풋샵 역삼자이점은 상품권 결제가 가능합니다. The foot shop nft는 보유 홀더에 제공하는 혜택에만 멈추지 않고 블록체인 payment 기능을 접목하여 여러 가상자산으로 가맹점 및 협력사에 결제 서비스 지원을 최종 목표로 하고 있습니다. Com › community › board건전 마사지샵 15곳 정도 방문한 유게이의 가이드라인txt.

chaeira xxx 새로 오픈한 매장이라 그런지 기존의 더풋샵 마사지샵의 이미지와 완전 달라 놀랐어요. 더풋샵 대법원에서 불법 안마업소로 확정이 된 업소이며 김앤장 변호사등을 고용하여 다투었으나 성과는 없었다. 이 글은 공감과 댓글이 허용되어 있지 않습니다. 새로 오픈한 매장이라 그런지 기존의 더풋샵 마사지샵의 이미지와 완전 달라 놀랐어요. 더풋샵 마포구 동교동 마사지 홍대입구역 근처 마맵.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.