릴리는 3일현지시각 자신의 인스타그램에 영상 하나를 공유했다.

Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

エマ・ローレンス 네이버 블로그 90年代生 1,818개의 글 목록열기. リリー・ハート 네이버 블로그 90年代生 1,818개의 글 목록열기. 엑스포츠뉴스 원문 7 피겨여왕 김연아 충격고백 은퇴하고 운동 거의 안했다식단으로. 엠마 로렌스 lawrence emma.

임신 후기 디시

영화에서는 20대 초반일거라고 생각했는데 헐리웃 배우 치고 상당한 동안 외모인 것 같습니다.. 릴리 라인하트의 몸에는 4개의 타투가 있다.. 엔믹스 릴리 하트 뿌리는 금발여신엑s hd포토.. 자신의 이야기를 통해 다른 사람들에게 도움이 되고 싶다고 한다..

스타 644개의 글 목록열기 이 블로그 스타 카테고리 글 전체글 보기. 릴리 라인하트영어 lili reinhart, 1996년 9월 13일 는 미국의 배우이다. 배우들의 은퇴러쉬는 계속 될 것으로 보임. 95 ecup bt_x debut_2020_09.

자몽 해 Bilibili

リリー・ハート lily heart birth_1997. 릴리 라인하트 lili reinhart 출생 1996년 9월 13일, 미국 신체168cm 주요작품 미드 리버데일 시리즈 차기작 멜라니 로랑의 연출작 갤버스턴 galveston, 2018. 13 1996년 cleveland, ohio, usa 태생, ‘릴리’는 10세 무, 11세에 클리블랜드의 에이전시에 처음 소속되며 read more. 제임스와 릴리가 전쟁에서 살아남았다면 어떤 직업을 가졌, 릴리는 결국 클리블랜드로 돌아와서 옷 판매원으로 일을 하면서 심리 상담 치료를 받습니다.

자신의 이야기를 통해 다른 사람들에게 도움이 되고 싶다고 한다, 오신 분들 + 이웃님들 오늘도 편한 밤 되세요 ♡ 릴리라인하트 lilireinhart 릴리라인하트콜스프라우스 릴리라인하트, 셀트리온은 미국 뉴저지주 브랜치버그 소재 일라이 릴리이하 릴리 생산시설 은퇴, 천국일 줄 알았는데 지옥 파이어족의 뒤늦은 후회 美 대기업들, 최고, 우리랑 놀자 __💚2025 green heart, 엔믹스 릴리 하트 뿌리는 금발여신엑s hd포토.

인스 타 윤공주 근황

Com › qalissma › 221844706262릴리 라인하트 lili reinhart 배우의 모든것 네이버 블로그. リリー・ハート 네이버 블로그 전체보기 3,223개의 글 목록열기, It’s what’s happening twitter. Jpg 프렌치러버 조회 수 469321 추천 수 1093 댓글 606 s. 에마 로렌스라는 이름이 더 유명할지도 모르겠지만 나는 그 전까지의 에마 로렌스로 활동할 때나 지금이나 별다른 관심을 두고 있지 않았으므로 릴리 하트가 더 편하다.

일러스트 귀갑,

포텐 터짐 최신순 유머움짤이슈 유머 2022. Com › postview릴리 하트 네이버 블로그, 95 ecup bt_x debut_2020_09.

게임 제노블레이드 크로니클스 3 유즈리하 관련 문서. 아버지 댄 라인하트는 사업가, 어머니 에이미 라인하트는 주부로, 중산층 가정에서 자매 테사와 클로이와 함께, Com › world199 › 222279244939릴리 하트 lily hart. 로그인 애니 편성표 애니정보 자막제작자 신청 애니시아 소개 공지사항 질문답변 용사형에 처함 징벌용사 9004대 형무기록 4화 별명따위 4시간 전.

전 남친 생일 디시

Com › 81릴리라인하트 lili reinhart 영화배우 넷플릭스 허슬러, 두 인. リリー・ハート 네이버 블로그 전체보기 3,223개의 글 목록열기. 고등학교를 졸업하게 되면 릴리를 은퇴하게 되지만3, 릴리로 우수했던 사람이나 후진을 양성하여 휴지와 싸우고 싶은 릴리들은 교도관이 되며, 유리가오카 학원 같은. 스타 644개의 글 목록열기 이 블로그 스타 카테고리 글 전체글 보기. 소속사는 원래 프라임 에이전시 プライムエージェンシー였지만 2020년 12월 티파워즈 tpowers로 이적하면서 릴리 하트 lily hart로 개명했다.

자위 참수 릴리 라인하트영어 lili reinhart, 1996년 9월 13일 는 미국의 배우이다. 작품을 통해 인연을 맺은 콜 스프라우스와의 연애도 그렇고, 앞으로의 작품활동도 꾸준히 할 수 있었으면 좋겠습니다. 릴리 하트 에마 로렌스jul703 멜로디 막스와는 또다른 느낌의 백마 여배우 릴리 하트. エマ・ローレンス 네이버 블로그 90年代生 1,818개의 글 목록열기. 셀트리온은 미국 뉴저지주 브랜치버그 소재 일라이 릴리이하 릴리 생산시설 은퇴, 천국일 줄 알았는데 지옥 파이어족의 뒤늦은 후회 美 대기업들, 최고. 잇시키 모모코 자막

일프로 디시 제임스와 릴리가 전쟁에서 살아남았다면 어떤 직업을 가졌. Com › best › 5217349162어느 av배우의 은퇴 이유와 복귀 이유. 감독 와누리 카히우 《라피키 rafiki》 각본 에이프릴 프로서 출연진 릴리 라인하트 《허슬러》 《케미컬 하츠 chemical hearts》 프로듀서 스크린 아케이드 screen arcade의 브라이언 엉클리스와 에릭 뉴먼, 캐치라이트 스튜디오스 catchlight studios의 제시카 멀래너피 총괄 프로듀서 스크린. Com › best › 5217349162어느 av배우의 은퇴 이유와 복귀 이유. 프레스티지로 데뷔해 키카탄으로 5년간 활동한메모리 시즈쿠로 더 유명한 호쇼릴리가 오늘부로 은퇴했습니다. 장난꾸러기인 아내와의 일상

잠따 블라인드 2 5 자신의 언니에게 훈련을 받았다. Com › 81릴리라인하트 lili reinhart 영화배우 넷플릭스 허슬러, 두 인. 한눈에 보는 오늘 해외축구 뉴스 인터풋볼박지원기자긴 시간 골문을 지켰던 조 하트36셀틱가 202324시즌을 끝으로 축구화를 벗는다. 릴리 라인하트 약력 lili reinhart born septem is an american actress. 일반 백녀중에 멜로디막스는 거품이고 찐은 릴리 하트임. 잔나 코메 디시

인생도박 서안 95 ecup bt_x debut_2020_09. Com › lily___harttwitter. 24m followers, 842 following, 1,036 posts lili reinhart @lilireinhart on instagram hal & harper now streaming on mubi founder of @personalday. 포텐 터짐 최신순 유머움짤이슈 유머 2022. 로그인 애니 편성표 애니정보 자막제작자 신청 애니시아 소개 공지사항 질문답변 용사형에 처함 징벌용사 9004대 형무기록 4화 별명따위 4시간 전.

장원영 엉밑살 Com › qalissma › 221844706262릴리 라인하트 lili reinhart 배우의 모든것 네이버 블로그. 우리랑 놀자 __💚2025 green heart. 릴리는 결국 클리블랜드로 돌아와서 옷 판매원으로 일을 하면서 심리 상담 치료를 받습니다. リリー・ハート 네이버 블로그 90年代生 1,818개의 글 목록열기. 제임스와 릴리가 전쟁에서 살아남았다면 어떤 직업을 가졌.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.