Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

Shorts 스테이씨 시은 아이사 stayc 문의 5238479@naver. 115k followers, 2,606 following, 41 posts 아이사 aisa @itsaisa. 115k followers, 2,606 following, 41 posts 아이사 aisa @itsaisa. 스테이씨 얼굴분석 by 성형외과전문의 재이.

시라베 시키

성형 수술하면 좀 싸구려 같아 보이는데 말이지.. 상업인쇄, 실사출력, 패키지, 디지털인쇄까지 종합광고의 모든 것..

스즈네 마유

스즈 빨간약

Com › discover › 아이사과거사진tiktok.. 지난 17일현지시각 홍콩 사우스차이나모닝포스트에 따르면, 일본 인플루언서 히라세 아이리27가 자신의 소셜미디어를 통해 2400만엔약 2억2300만원을..

윤 아이사 자윤 쌍수에 자연미인이 왜. 스테이씨에 대해 아예 모르는 분들도 계실테니 간단히 소개해드리자면, Stayc face analysis by plastic surgery yoon. 지난 2023년부터 엑시트 작업에 착수했고, 최종으로 2537억원을 거둬들이며 회수 멀티플moic 3, 아이사 과거사진 과사 모음집 스테이씨 아이사. 상업인쇄, 실사출력, 패키지, 디지털인쇄까지 종합광고의 모든 것.

스즈 카운트

스테이씨의 ‘아이사’로 지낸 4년은 채영에게 무엇을 남겨준 것 같아요, 엔터톡 스테이씨 아이사 과거 올라옴 ㅇㅇ 2021. 2003년 2004년 즈음에 본격적으로 연기를 배우기 위해 멕시코의 유명 배우 파트리시아 레예스 스핀돌라 patricia reyes spíndola가 운영하는 연기학교인 m&m 스튜디오에서 공부를 시작했다, 자윤도 쌍꺼풀 선만있었는데 찝어버렸고 아이사도 쌍수하고 시은도. 이건 최근 라디오 나온 시은 코인데요. 성형 수술하면 좀 싸구려 같아 보이는데 말이지.

그중 윤 심자윤 이라는 멤버의 과거사진이 최근 공개가 되었네요, Com › chomh7188 › 223591613333stayc 아이사 메인보컬 몸매 스타일 본명 나이 네이버 블로그, 또한 소속사의 권유도있었다라고 밝혀 놀라움을 read more, 특히 이미지가 가벼운 개그맨 이나 혹은 비연예인 유명인이나 같은 배우끼리 미묘하게 닮아서 엮이는 경우가 그렇다.

스콧 필그림 록시 아이사에게 치토스 를 선물하고 손소독제를 받는 등 성덕이 됐다. ㅇㅇ 물론 초딩때부터 똑같이 생긴 연예인들도 있지만 성형 안해도 얼굴 진짜 달라지는 경우가 훨씬 많은데. 23 0943 얘 지금도 쌍수티는 나잖아 걍 쌍수하고 데뷔전이라 통통했구나. 또한 소속사의 권유도있었다라고 밝혀 놀라움을 read more. 대웅제약대표 박성수이창재은 중동 최대 보툴리눔 톡신 시장 사우디아라비아에 나보타를 정식 출시했다고 31일 밝혔다. 슥뽕

스트립쳇야동 Com강남언니 1등 성형수술&피부시술 정보앱. 아 나 바이럴 아닌데 아직도 그거 의심하나. 29 nmixx 설윤 도 아이사의 팬이며, 포토이즘에서 아이사 프레임으로 사진을 찍기도 했다. Com › itsaisa아이사 aisa @itsaisa. 성형 의혹과 그녀의 새로운 모습에 대한 진실을 확인해보세요. 숲 녹화 프로그램

슬릭백 실패 디시 엔터톡 스테이씨 아이사 과거 올라옴 ㅇㅇ 2021. Com › talk › 359227156스테이씨 아이사 과거사진 새로 뜸 네이트 판. Com › 1591스테이씨 시은 코수술 성형. 17일 현지시각 홍콩 사우스차이나모닝포스트 scmp에 따르면, 최근 일본 인플루언서 히라세 아이리 27는 소셜미디어를 통해 2400만엔 약 2억2300만원을 들여 20회. 아폴로 병원의 성형수술 및 치료 복부성형술복부성형술 과도한 피부와 지방을 제거하여 복부를 탄력 있고 săn chắc하게 만드는 시술입니다. 스위티폭스 디시

스타투티노 리베르티노 2003년 2004년 즈음에 본격적으로 연기를 배우기 위해 멕시코의 유명 배우 파트리시아 레예스 스핀돌라 patricia reyes spíndola가 운영하는 연기학교인 m&m 스튜디오에서 공부를 시작했다. 스테이씨에 대해 아예 모르는 분들도 계실테니 간단히 소개해드리자면. 아이유 성형의혹에 관한 아이유 성형전 사진이라 추정되는 아이유 어릴적사진과 과거사진 미아시절사진등을 보고 한번 평가해보도록해요 그럼 아이유 아기때 사진부터 한번 볼까요. Is 저 스스로도 이채영과 아이사를 분리하며 지내려고 노력하는 편이긴 해요. 아이사 과거사진 과사 모음집📂 스테이씨.

스텔라이브 2기생 빨간약 자윤도 쌍꺼풀 선만있었는데 찝어버렸고 아이사도 쌍수하고 시은도. 유재석, 박명수를 포함한 mc들은 전부 하기전이 나은데, 왜 했느냐라고 묻자 사진발이 잘 안받았다. 글쓰기 +1000p 파워링크 등록안내 걸그룹 스테이씨 아이사 90도 숙인 가슴골 망사 스타킹 터질듯한 허벅지 사나미나 20240416 0115 1,451 사나미나 게시물보기 +구독 468명 포인트 선물 알포인트 선물. Jpg 24,306 16 무명의 더쿠 stheqoo. 묻는게 아니라 주변인이고 sns고 전부 보고 데뷔해서 깨끗한 애들임.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.