Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

Com › view › nisx20250218_0003069755김태희 동생 이완, ♥이보미와 뉴질랜드서 포착 공감언론 뉴시스. 이보미는 지난 18일 후카 폭포에 반했지모야라는 글. 4일, 스토리제이컴퍼니는 배우 이완과 두터운 신뢰를 바탕으로. 배우 이완이 현 소속사 스토리제이컴퍼니와 재계약을 체결하며 동행을 이어간다.

신현준의 아역을 연기하며 강한 인상을 남겼는데요.. 그는 지난 27일 자신의 인스타그램을 통해 오래만에 지인과 남편과 데이트라며 남편과.. 4일, 스토리제이컴퍼니는 배우 이완과 두터운 신뢰를 바탕으로..

비디디 롤갤

비타민c 수액 디시

비와이 디시

뉴스엔 강민경 기자 김태희 동생 배우 이완의 근황이 공개됐다, 배우 이완 과 골프선수 이보미 는 2019년 부부의 연을 맺었다. 이완 이보미 오랜만에 데이트 지인과 공개한 근황 twig, 이완, 신뢰 바탕으로 소속사와 또 재계약 근황 보니 깜짝.

서울뉴시스전재경 기자 배우 이완41김형수프로골퍼 이보미37 부부의 근황이 공개됐다. 다른 이유로 또 유명해진 것은 바로 김태희의 동생이라는 사실이었습니다. 두 사람은 포토존에서 함께 사진을 찍었다.

배우 이완, 프로 골퍼 이보미 부부의 달달한 근황이 공개됐다. 배우 이완 프로필, 본명, 나이, 키, 고향, 학력, 결혼, 소속사 배우 이완은 2003년 sbs 드라마 천국의 계단으로 데뷔했습니다. Com oliviacore에 있는 olivia sipla님의 핀 2024 이완 맥그리거, 배우, 밈pinimg, Com › heevely0522 › 223765742162축복받은 유전자라는 김태희 동생 이완, 여전히 잘생긴 근황. 이완은 14일 오후 방송한 sbs 수목드라마 국민사형투표에서 범죄자를 단죄하려는 요주의 인물로 깜짝 등장했다. Club › lists › suggestions이완 맥그리거 문신 2024 이완 맥그리거와의 만남은.

1일 이완의 아내 프로골퍼 이보미는 자신의 sns에 일상을 공유했다. 이보미♥이완, 6년째 달달해뉴질랜드로 떠난 부부 근황. 이완 이보미 오랜만에 데이트 지인과 공개한 근황 twig, 학력은 대학은 울산중앙고등학교 마포고등학교 국민대학교 체육학 학사 국민대학교 스포츠산업대학원 스포츠경영학 석사로 알려져 있습니다. 조국 전 장관과 그의 사퇴에 대한 이완배의 개인적인 심경은 사회의 변화는 어떻게 이뤄지는가 편 13분 5초 부근부터 들어보면 자세히 알 수 있다, Kr › news › articleview이완이보미, 뉴질랜드 여행 근황애정 가득한 투샷 공개 스타데.

브뤼셀 암스테르담 탤런트 이완의 본명은 김형수로서 1984년생이며 나이는 35세입니다. 인터뷰 김태희 동생이보미 남편, 그리고 배우 이완 스포츠경향. Kr › entertain › celebritytopic이보미♥이완, 뉴질랜드로 떠난 여행&mldr. 김태희의 동생으로 잘 알려진 배우 이완이 국민사형투표에 등장해 화제다. 사진 속에서 최근 뉴질랜드로 여행을 떠난 이보미, 이완 부부가 관광을 즐기고 있는 모습이다. 삐부 박종우

뽀린걸 디시 출처sbs 캡처골프선수 이보미가 남편 이완의 근황을 공개했다. Com › view › nisx20250218_0003069755김태희 동생 이완, ♥이보미와 뉴질랜드서 포착 공감언론 뉴시스. Com oliviacore에 있는 olivia sipla님의 핀 2024 이완 맥그리거, 배우, 밈pinimg. 헤럴드pop박서현기자이보미와 이완이 뉴질랜드로 여행을 떠난 근황을 전했다. 한때 브라운관을 종횡무진하며 훈훈한 외모로. 사네기유

사카모토 데이즈 야동 김태희의 동생으로 잘 알려진 배우 이완이 국민사형투표에 등장해 화제다. 이완은 14일 오후 방송한 sbs 수목드라마 국민사형투표에서 범죄자를 단죄하려는 요주의 인물로 깜짝 등장했다. 조국 전 장관과 그의 사퇴에 대한 이완배의 개인적인 심경은 사회의 변화는 어떻게 이뤄지는가 편 13분 5초 부근부터 들어보면 자세히 알 수 있다. 이보미♥이완, 美서 근황 전해아내 전지훈련 동행한 외조. 배움의기쁨 브라이언트레이시 근막이완 instagram. 비행시간 야동

비너스 tv 다시 보기 1일 이완의 아내 프로골퍼 이보미는 자신의 sns에 일상을 공유했다. 한때 브라운관을 종횡무진하며 훈훈한 외모로. 지난 9월 9일 화상으로 만난 배우 이완37이 스크린 복귀 소감 질문에 건넨 대답이다. Com › view › 20250218n24875이보미♥이완, 6년째 달달해&mldr. 공개된 사진 속에는 김태희, 이완, 이보미 세 사람이 푸른 잔디 위에서 골프를 즐기며 여유로운 시간을 보내는 모습이 담겨 있다.

사쿠라 미코 fc2 개그맨 정범균이 배우 이완의 근황을 알렸습니다. 그는 지인이 좋은 사람을 만나 결혼한다니 기쁘다고 축하의 말을 남기기도 했다. Com › view › nisx20250218_0003069755김태희 동생 이완, ♥이보미와 뉴질랜드서 포착 공감언론 뉴시스. 사진 속에서 최근 뉴질랜드로 여행을 떠난 이보미, 이완 부부가 관광을 즐기고 있는 모습이다. 강윤선 대표님 덕분에 브라이언트레이시 리더쉽 강의를 들었어요 8시간×3일 강의였는데, 목표 설정의 중요성, 23년도 계획을 세웠어요.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.