Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

사용자토론이지서 위키백과, 우리 모두의 백과사전. 서울 지하철 7호선 까치울역서 열차 고장견인 뒤 정상 운행. 이지프랜차이즈 프랜차이즈 정보공개서 가맹거래사 가맹계약서. 인터넷을 이용하여 이메일을 확인하듯 간편하게 이용할 수 있습니다.

어린 상사 실사 다시 보기

메디게이트뉴스 이지원 기자 일동제약그룹의 신약 연구개발 회사인 아이리드비엠에스ileadbms가 14일현지시각까지 스페인 바르셀로나에서 열리는 2025년 유럽류마티스학회eular에 참가해 자가면역질환 신약후보물질 il21120033과 관련한 전임상 연구 성과를 공개한다고 밝혔다.. 뒤늦게 올려보는 1000일기념 제주도여행 5개월전부터 준비한 나 스튜디오도 오픈런 예약하고 귤밭사진관 화기애애한.. Com 업무dm ️ 혁필구경은 @bokbokdang_letter.. 대한민국 의 뉴에이지, 이지 리스닝 연주 음악 작곡가..

엔터톡 베스트

이에 따라 향후 주주총회에서는 이사 후보 개인의 요건 충족 여부뿐 아니라, 이사회가 경영진을 견제하고 주요 리스크를 관리하는 실질적인 의사결정기구 read more. 충남대전, 전남광주, 대구경북 통합특별법 발의, Com 업무dm ️ 혁필구경은 @bokbokdang_letter. 이에 따라 향후 주주총회에서는 이사 후보 개인의 요건 충족 여부뿐 아니라, 이사회가 경영진을 견제하고 주요 리스크를 관리하는 실질적인 의사결정기구 read more.

Com › withyourmehaha이지서 @withyourmehaha instagram photos and videos. 한국타이어, wrc 2026 개막전서 모터스포츠 기술력 입증. 가수 이지서 덕분에 원곡 한규철 스타가요일번지 시즌2 112. 이지서 💰포인트 이벤트 검증업체,먹튀제보 스포츠소식 vr소식 비회원갤러리 회원갤러리 포인트게임 고객센터, 이지프랜차이즈 프랜차이즈 정보공개서 가맹거래사 가맹계약서, 바로 가입하기 지금 바로 가입하시고, 기관의 업무를 확 줄여주는 놀라움을 만나보세요.

Hours ago — 서울교통공사 관계자는 해당 열차가 움직이지 못해 승객들을 하차시킨 뒤 다른 열차를 이용해 견인했다며 저녁 7시 55분부터 정상 운행을 시작했다고. 빠른 발송 우체국에 접수 내일 우체국에 접수됩니다. 충남대전, 전남광주, 대구경북 통합특별법 발의. 다행히도 도시민들의 농업과 농촌의 공익적 가치에 대한 태도가 부정적이지는 않다. 사용자토론이지서 위키백과, 우리 모두의 백과사전. 동화사, 목은당 현부 대선사 영결다비식 엄수.

올 정기주총 핵심쟁점은 개정상법 이행이사회 책임 강화.. Mbc every1 tv톡0개 최신 시청률1.. 이지프랜차이즈 프랜차이즈 정보공개서 가맹거래사 가맹계약서.. 한국타이어는 이번 랠리에 타막 랠리용 레이싱 타이어 벤투스 z215와 스노우 랠리용 타이어 윈터 아이셉트 sr20을 공급했다..

양아지 엉덩이

서울 지하철 7호선 까치울역서 열차 고장견인 뒤 정상 운행. 다행히도 도시민들의 농업과 농촌의 공익적 가치에 대한 태도가 부정적이지는 않다. Mbc every1 tv톡0개 최신 시청률1. 대한민국 의 뉴에이지, 이지 리스닝 연주 음악 작곡가. 먼저 2024년 새해복 많이 받으세요 모두 원하시는 것들을 이루는 한 해가 되시기를 바래요. 삼성동노래방 삼성동가라오케 내상 제로 365일 연중무휴 운영 시스템.

엔쥬 레이디스 49세 진재영, 군살 하나도 없네완벽 레깅스핏 비결은 이. 벤투스 z215는 마른 노면 read more. 디지털트윈 클라우드 rag ai 제조 모빌리티 방위dx혁신 이즈파크 카티아 시뮬리아 델미아 등 엔지니어링 솔루션,hr통합솔루션 에스게이트 제공. 49세 진재영, 군살 하나도 없네완벽 레깅스핏 비결은 이. 가수 이지서 덕분에 원곡 한규철 스타가요일번지 시즌2 112회 240107 3부. 엉덩이짤

에페이오스 디시 Hours ago — 지식나눔과 기부로 함께 성장하는 지식in을 만나보세요. 메디게이트뉴스 이지원 기자 일동제약그룹의 신약 연구개발 회사인 아이리드비엠에스ileadbms가 14일현지시각까지 스페인 바르셀로나에서 열리는 2025년 유럽류마티스학회eular에 참가해 자가면역질환 신약후보물질 il21120033과 관련한 전임상 연구 성과를 공개한다고 밝혔다. 400년 위기설의 언사와 배경 맺음말 참고문헌 abstract 참고문헌 0 참고문헌 신청 참고문헌이 dbpia에서 서비스 중이라면, 참고문헌 신청을 통해. Minutes ago — 민주당이 당론으로 발의한 두 개의 특별법에는 서울특별시에 준하는 위상과 재정 분권을 통합특별시에 부여하고, 국무총리 산하 통합특별시 지원위원회를 read more. 정찰제 착한 가격과 최고의 vvip 서비스. 엉덩이 만지는 짤

약싸몰 디시 프리랜서 마냥 글쓰는게 좋아 작가가 되고 싶은. 사진 추가 편지와 함께 보내실 사진을 추가해 주세요 03. 메디게이트뉴스 이지원 기자 일동제약그룹의 신약 연구개발 회사인 아이리드비엠에스ileadbms가 14일현지시각까지 스페인 바르셀로나에서 열리는 2025년 유럽류마티스학회eular에 참가해 자가면역질환 신약후보물질 il21120033과 관련한 전임상 연구 성과를 공개한다고 밝혔다. 먼저 2024년 새해복 많이 받으세요 모두 원하시는 것들을 이루는 한 해가 되시기를 바래요. 이현의 성격은 탐람하고, 사람을 해치는 것을 좋아하였다. 야코r19

야코레즈 충남대전, 전남광주, 대구경북 통합특별법 발의. 조계종 초대 종정 설석우 스님의 시봉이자 청빈한 수행자로 존경받아 온 목은당 현부 대선사가 지수화풍 사대로 돌아갔다. 대한민국 의 뉴에이지, 이지 리스닝 연주 음악 작곡가. 개인정보 보호방침 주소 충남 천안시 서북구 성거읍 봉주로 170 성거읍 소우리 195번 사업자등록번호 31 대표이사. 206 views 1 year ago more.

어나더레드 모에몬 적용 빠른 발송 우체국에 접수 내일 우체국에 접수됩니다. 503 followers, 236 following, 202 posts see instagram photos and videos from 서이지 @seo_yiji. Hours ago — 배우 진재영49이 필라테스하는 모습을 공개했다. 동화사, 목은당 현부 대선사 영결다비식 엄수. 올 정기주총 핵심쟁점은 개정상법 이행이사회 책임 강화.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.