Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

애니메이션, 드라마 cd, 실사 영화, 뮤지컬, 극장판 등 미디어 믹스가 활발히 이루어지고 있습니다. 오낑이 @llife_isegg posts x. 올라간 점수에 따라서 mmr도 동일하게 작동되어야 서로의 괴리감이 없는데, 그렇지 못해서 티어대비 말도 안되는 매칭 시스템이 관측되는 사례가 늘고 read more. 또한 실시간으로 트위터 동영상을 다운로드하기 위한 최적의 도구도 추천하여 초보자도 안심하고 이용할 수 있는 사이트를 엄선합니다.

라고 개떡같이 말해도 찰떡같이 이쁘게 머리 해주시는 @yay_marr 쓰앵님, 단발 단발스타일 숏단발 잠실 예이하우스.. 대한민국 대표 국내외 단체수영모자 주문생산업체.. 일어나서 친구한테서 메시지를 받았는데, 내 폰이 트위밍 링크를 왓츠앱 여러 그룹에 공유해서 보냈대..

Fc2 에리카 자막

Fc2-ppv-4785772 Missav

Fc 1727682

대한민국에는 아티스틱 스위밍 외에도 수중발레, 싱크로나이즈드 스위밍, 싱크로, 싱크로 수영, 싱크로나이즈, 싱크로나이즈드 등으로도 불리고 있으며 1 북한에서는 예술헤엄이라고 부르고 있다, 아티스틱 스위밍 싱크로나이즈드 스위밍은 수면 위에서 음악에 맞춘 연기로 수영, 체조, 발레의 결합된 종합예술 스포츠입니다, Org › wiki › 아티스틱스위밍아티스틱스위밍 위키백과, 우리 모두의 백과사전, 1998년 방콕아시안게임 은메달리스트 유나미 43는 아티스틱 스위밍 불모지. 다음 올림픽을 앞두고 olympics, Com아티스틱 스위밍 퀸즈 아티스틱 스위밍 클럽.

Fc2ppv-4795385

애니메이션, 드라마 cd, 실사 영화, 뮤지컬, 극장판 등 미디어 믹스가 활발히 이루어지고 있습니다. 서울특별시 노원구에 소재한 국립 종합대학 서울과학기술대학교 재학생, 졸업생, 신입생과 입학을 원하는 수험생을 위한 갤러리입니다, 우주 어딘가에 있는 이모션 왕국이라는 왕국의 공주 로미가 지구로 뿔뿔이 흩어진 마음의 요정인 티니핑들을 캐치하러 지구로 떠나, 지구에 있는 하모니 마을이라는 read more.

fc2 자막 디시 올라간 점수에 따라서 mmr도 동일하게 작동되어야 서로의 괴리감이 없는데, 그렇지 못해서 티어대비 말도 안되는 매칭 시스템이 관측되는 사례가 늘고 read more. G fantasy 에서 인기리에 연재중인 작품입니다. 올리브영 온라인몰 enhypen엔하이픈 앨범 구매 특전✨ 일시 2026. 사진찍는법 나도 췄다 홍박사ㅋㅋㅋㅌㅌ 너무 재밌엉ㅋㅋㅋ ✨✨ 홍박사님. 대한민국에는 아티스틱 스위밍 외에도 수중발레, 싱크로나이즈드 스위밍, 싱크로, 싱크로 수영, 싱크로나이즈, 싱크로나이즈드 등으로도 불리고 있으며 1 북한에서는 예술헤엄이라고 부르고 있다. fc2 주간

fc2 3750179 Org › wiki › 아티스틱스위밍아티스틱스위밍 위키백과, 우리 모두의 백과사전. 아티스틱 스위밍 싱크로나이즈드 스위밍은 수면 위에서 음악에 맞춘 연기로 수영, 체조, 발레의 결합된 종합예술 스포츠입니다. 감탄을 자아내는 아크로바틱 한 기술과 화려한 퍼포먼스를 선보입니다. Com아티스틱 스위밍 퀸즈 아티스틱 스위밍 클럽. 일반 현재 용맹의 방패는 실패한 시스템. fc2 야스

fc2 인기 2017년, 명칭이 synchronized swimming에서 artistic swimming으로 변경되었습니다. 이전에는 싱크로나이즈드 스위밍 synchronized swimming으로 불리었다가 2017년 7월부터 아티스틱 스위밍이라는 새로운 종목명으로 바뀌었지만, 아직까지도 편의상 싱크로나이즈드 스위밍이라고 부르는 경우도 있다. 서울뉴시스 추상철 김진아 기자 2024 파리 올림픽 아티스틱 스위밍 단체 테크니컬 루틴 경기가 5일 현지시간 프랑스 생드니 상트르 아쿠아티크에서 펼쳐졌다. Com에서 더 많은 정보를 찾아보세요. 2017년 부터 아티스틱 스위밍으로 불리게 되었습니다. fc2 아미짱

fc21560667 G fantasy 에서 인기리에 연재중인 작품입니다. Kr › sports › courses프로그램안내 종목강좌 아티스틱 스위밍, 올림픽수영장. 사진찍는법 나도 췄다 홍박사ㅋㅋㅋㅌㅌ 너무 재밌엉ㅋㅋㅋ ✨✨ 홍박사님. Com에서 더 많은 정보를 찾아보세요. 2025 제10회 한강크로스스위밍챌린지.

fc2 civi Com에서 더 많은 정보를 찾아보세요. 이전에는 싱크로나이즈드 스위밍 synchronized swimming으로 불리었다가 2017년 7월부터 아티스틱 스위밍이라는 새로운 종목명으로 바뀌었지만, 아직까지도 편의상 싱크로나이즈드 스위밍이라고 부르는 경우도 있다. 서울특별시 노원구에 소재한 국립 종합대학 서울과학기술대학교 재학생, 졸업생, 신입생과 입학을 원하는 수험생을 위한 갤러리입니다. 이날 경기에는 프랑스를 비롯해 일본, 스페인, 이집트팀 등이 참가해 화려한 연기를 선보였다. Org › wiki › 아티스틱스위밍아티스틱스위밍 위키백과, 우리 모두의 백과사전.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.