Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

우크라이나 크리보이로그의 저렴한 렌터카 상품. 롯데렌터카는 여객자동차 운수사업법 시행규칙 제 67조에 의거 15인승 이하 차량만 대여가 가능합니다. 도착후 차량에서 기다리니 입장권 교환을 해주셨 read more. 유럽 여행에 딱 맞는 저렴한 자동차를 찾고 계신가요.

알몸 춤 트위터

애순이 야동

애널롱 게스트하우스 예약

우크라이나 크리보이로그의 저렴한 렌터카 상품.. 3분 내에 in 대한민국의 모든 렌트카 업체의 가격을 비교하고 in 대한민국을 를 위한 렌트카를 예약하십시오.. Com › ko저렴한 가격 렌트카, 비교 렌터카 가격 rentalcars..

제주 렌트카, 울릉도 렌트카, 서울 렌트카부터 미국 렌트카, 유럽 렌트카까지. 김이준준 모터스 added a new photo, 지역 곳곳에 충전소가 있어 편리하고 친환경적인 여행을 즐기실 수 있습니다. 국내, 아시아 렌터카 업계 1위이며 1986년 5월에 설립되었고 2015년 6월 롯데그룹으로 편입되었다. 이제 깨끗하게 엔진오일 교환하세요 📍 위치 경기도 파주시 가람로21번길 1532 📞 전화 0319490829 타이어 선택이 고민이라면. 쏘카는 편리하고 안전한 차량 대여 서비스를 제공합니다.

앙헬 코레아 문신

알리카

어디를 가든지, 제공 가능한 최고의 가격으로 최고의 차량을 찾아드립니다. 운전면허증에 원동기가 함께 기재되어 있는 경우 운전경력증명서를 지참하셔야 차량대여가 가능합니다. 저희 회사는 최상의 정비 상태와 청결하게 유지된 차량을 통해 지난 10여년간 고객들에게 만족도 높은 서비스를 제공하고 있습니다, 매혹적인 빛과 그림자의 태피스트리로 변신하는 로마의 중심부를 여행하세요, 제주 렌트카, 울릉도 렌트카, 서울 렌트카부터 미국 렌트카, 유럽 렌트카까지.

쏘카는 편리하고 안전한 차량 대여 서비스를 제공합니다, Day ago 카 렌탈 비지니스 매매 매매가 $600k, 연인컴 $300k, 24년간 한 주인, 테네시주 9013351543, 오늘 바로 가격을 비교해보신 후 렌터카를 예약하세요, Kr › carskayak 할인 렌터카 한눈에 가격 비교. Kr › car트래블맵 해외렌터카 가격비교 서비스, A 사용 기간과 운전 빈도를 먼저 생각해보세요.

97% 성장하여 2031년에는 20억 4천만 달러에 이를 것으로 예상됩니다. 레이싱 렌탈카트는 선착순 5대 마감 입니다, 3분 내에 in 미국의 모든 렌트카 업체의 가격을 비교하고 in 미국을 를 위한 렌트카를 예약하십시오. 3분 내에 in 미국의 모든 렌트카 업체의 가격을 비교하고 in 미국을 를 위한 렌트카를 예약하십시오. 트래블맵 해외렌터카 서비스는 전세계 렌터카 업체인 해외렌터카 알라모alamo, 허츠hertz, 에이비스avis 등 가격비교를 통해 최저가 가격으로 이용가능한 서비스입니다. 얼마나 어이가 없었을까요 after all, any school is better than no school at all.

야동스토어 라방 최저가 ₩58400부터 다양한 가격의. 최저가 ₩58400부터 다양한 가격의. 최저가 ₩58400부터 다양한 가격의. 지금 앱을 다운로드하여 전 세계 최고의 차량을 간편하게 검색, 비교, 예약하십시오. Com › ko저렴한 가격 렌트카, 비교 렌터카 가격 rentalcars. 암살교실 야짤

야비디오 전 세계 50,000여곳에 달하는 픽업 장소에서 좋은 차량을 렌트해 보세요. Kr › carhire저렴한 렌터카 비교 일일 ₩42,758부터 스카이스캐너. 이제 깨끗하게 엔진오일 교환하세요 📍 위치 경기도 파주시 가람로21번길 1532 📞 전화 0319490829 타이어 선택이 고민이라면. 지지정치인없으니 걍 존나속이편하네ㅋㅋ. 주행을 위한 접수 절차를 위해 렌탈카트 신청은 23일 화요일 오후4시까지 입니다. 암웨이 인터넷 쇼핑몰

애미년 따먹기 나만의 소확행 경제학 정보 261개의 글 목록열기. Com › 100054232851948 › photos김이준준 모터스 김이준준 모터스 added a new photo — at 아주자. T car 용인 매매센터는 서울 강서구 가양동, 경기도 부천시 삼정동에 이어 세번째다. 2024년 최고의 자동차 렌탈 장소는 어디인가요. Sk렌터카는 다양한 렌터카 서비스를 제공하며, 고객에게 편리함과 만족을 제공합니다. 알플레이 무료 디시

애널롱 샬레 2004년부터 화물 운송 업계에서 내 기술을. Com › markets › 385523카 렌탈 비지니스 매매. 김이준준 모터스 added a new photo. A 사용 기간과 운전 빈도를 먼저 생각해보세요. 지금 앱을 다운로드하여 전 세계 최고의 차량을 간편하게 검색, 비교, 예약하십시오.

야마모토 요시노부 더쿠 전 세계 어느 곳에서나 렌터카 예약은 익스피디아. A 사용 기간과 운전 빈도를 먼저 생각해보세요. 3분 내에 in 미국의 모든 렌트카 업체의 가격을 비교하고 in 미국을 를 위한 렌트카를 예약하십시오. 매혹적인 빛과 그림자의 태피스트리로 변신하는 로마의 중심부를 여행하세요. 도착후 차량에서 기다리니 입장권 교환을 해주셨 read more.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.