Join facebook to connect with 손 유진 and others you may know.

Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

손 유진 in korea, republic of. Likes, 0 comments j̽i̽n̽m̽i̽ h̽o̽n̽g̽ @jinmi1985 on instagram 다이소에서 구매한 봉숭아 물들이기로 아들과 손 꾸미기 놀이 함. 결국 흘러넘친 치즈도 치킨에 올려서 다 먹긴 먹었다. 멤버 ‘슈’는 9일 자신의 트위터에 유진과 함께한 생일 파티 사진을 올렸다.

네티즌들에게 아빠로 불리는 14 나영석 Pd는 오래 전부터 계속 당해왔던 중이고, 취재기자로 상황극 중인 스태프에게도 성 빼.

손 유진 in korea, republic of.. 원하는 디자인을 최대한 맞춰주시려고 꼼꼼하게 봐주시는데 감동받았어요 준오헤어 강남역2호점에 가신다면 손유진디자이너 꼭 찾으셔서 손유진디자이너님께 케어 시술 받으세요.. 손유진 인스타그램 최신 소식, 손유진 틱톡..

View The Profiles Of People Named 손 유진.

The latest posts from @yujin_so, 손유진승진, 임채령〃 △월평1동 김민혁승진 △월평3동 우혜진전보 △만년동 김세진승진 △관저1동 부성준승진 △관저2동 허정아승진, 유진투자증권은 9일 만에 99만원에서 117만원으로 18만원18.

클린웜코튼 에스쁘아립스틱 피치멜바 티클드핑크 올리브영세일 향수추천 립스틱추천 여름. 산지폐기 문제를 해결하는 친환경 사료 브랜딩, reborn. Com › hyuuding@hyuuding x. 네티즌들에게 아빠로 불리는 14 나영석 pd는 오래 전부터 계속 당해왔던 중이고, 취재기자로 상황극 중인 스태프에게도 성 빼. 반도체ai 다음은 전력기기올해 계속 간다｜한민엽 유진투자증권 여의도wm센터 부센터장｜신재생에너지 반도체투자 ai산업.

손 유진 In Korea, Republic Of.

사소한 매너와 센스를 갖추고 있고, 주변 사람들을 잘 챙긴다.

The latest posts from @hyuuding. 유진 choi @wpdlatm10 posts 그대는 나아가시오 난 한걸음 물러나니, View the profiles of people named 손 유진. S 출신 ‘유진’의 생일파티 사진이 트위터를 통해 공개됐다. 멤버 ‘슈’는 9일 자신의 트위터에 유진과 함께한 생일 파티 사진을 올렸다. 팬 플랫폼을 통해 트위터나 다음카페처럼 단순히 아티스트의 일방적인 소통이 아닌 쌍방.

Likes, 0 comments j̽i̽n̽m̽i̽ h̽o̽n̽g̽ @jinmi1985 on instagram 다이소에서 구매한 봉숭아 물들이기로 아들과 손 꾸미기 놀이 함, 작가 손유진은 제주도라는 특유의 공간이 잉태했던 구전의 설화說話, 신화神話를 오늘날 재해석하는 작업에 골몰해 왔다, 결국 흘러넘친 치즈도 치킨에 올려서 다 먹긴 먹었다, It’s what’s happening twitter. 유진 choi @wpdlatm10 posts 그대는 나아가시오 난 한걸음 물러나니.

X twitter explore 손유진 ←↗. 필모그래피 2 트위터 페이스북 구글아트앤컬쳐 한국영상자료원. Com › yujin_so@yujin_so x, 유진 choi @wpdlatm10 posts x. 글로벌 네트워크 장비 기업 티피링크tplink는 화이트 디자인 와이파이7 유무선 공유기 archer be5100을 국내에 출시했다. 섬이라는 특수 공간이 야기한 제주만의.

fan za 팬 플랫폼을 통해 트위터나 다음카페처럼 단순히 아티스트의 일방적인 소통이 아닌 쌍방. Com › _yujin_an_twitter. 반도체ai 다음은 전력기기올해 계속 간다｜한민엽 유진투자. 다양한 매력으로 팬들을 사로잡는 그녀의 모든 순간을 놓치지 마세요. 멤버 ‘슈’는 9일 자신의 트위터에 유진과 함께한 생일 파티 사진을 올렸다. fc2-ppv-4591674 女優

fc2 content ranking 손유진 인스타그램 최신 소식, 손유진 틱톡. 손유진 인스타그램 최신 소식, 손유진 틱톡. 손유진승진, 임채령〃 △월평1동 김민혁승진 △월평3동 우혜진전보 △만년동 김세진승진 △관저1동 부성준승진 △관저2동 허정아승진. 글로벌 네트워크 장비 기업 티피링크tplink는 화이트 디자인 와이파이7 유무선 공유기 archer be5100을 국내에 출시했다. Com › _yujin_an_twitter. fc2ppv1867550

fc2 civi 연아가 웃어주니 오빠가 창피하구나 역시 연아는 대인배이기까지 하는구나 에헴 릴렉스하고 잠을 청해야겠어 우리 연아 최고야 정말 최고야. 멤버 ‘슈’는 9일 자신의 트위터에 유진과 함께한 생일 파티 사진을 올렸다. 90도 인사와 악수할 때 손을 올리는 등 무의식에서 나오는 예의범절이 킬링포인트. 글로벌 네트워크 장비 기업 티피링크tplink는 화이트 디자인 와이파이7 유무선 공유기 archer be5100을 국내에 출시했다. 네티즌들에게 아빠로 불리는 14 나영석 pd는 오래 전부터 계속 당해왔던 중이고, 취재기자로 상황극 중인 스태프에게도 성 빼. fayefayebaby

fc2-ppv-2864440 脱ぐつもりじゃなかった18才処女もみじちゃんのアートなヌード！電マで初イキ潮吹き！初フェラごっくん！ 90도 인사와 악수할 때 손을 올리는 등 무의식에서 나오는 예의범절이 킬링포인트. 유진 choi @wpdlatm10 posts x. 다양한 매력으로 팬들을 사로잡는 그녀의 모든 순간을 놓치지 마세요. Com › public › 손유진손 유진 profiles facebook. 베리타스알파김하연 기자 태양광 전문기업 비에스텍 손유진 대표가 대학 발전을 위해 써달라며 발전기금 1천만원을 경북대에 전달했다.

fc2ppv 1837582 石原さ●み似の超美形19歳の神乳を堪能しました 중앙 오른쪽에 유진과 남편 기태영이 함께. 팬 플랫폼을 통해 트위터나 다음카페처럼 단순히 아티스트의 일방적인 소통이 아닌 쌍방. 유진 choi @wpdlatm10 posts 그대는 나아가시오 난 한걸음 물러나니. 쌍방삽질 오지게 하다가 드디어 사귀는 혅윶. 2%, bnk투자증권은 11일 만에 92만원에서 106만원으로 14만원15.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.