Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

그리고 우리나라 성씨중에 축씨와 골씨도 있는것인가요. 킹받네뜻은 2018년 후반에 침착맨이 사용한 열받네라는 말을 시청자들이 앞단어에 킹이나 갓을 넣어서 만든. 인터넷 방송을 넘어 이제는 일상생활에서도 많이 뜨는 킹받다라는. 킹받치 @ooaall12 님의 최신 동영상을 시청하세요.

천방지축마골피의 성씨는 옛날에는 천민의 성씨였나요.. 드루킹 사건 이후 아직도 1000여명.. 아무튼, 주말 귀여워서 킹받는다고 열받는다는 뜻의 변조어 개발팀의 이 대리가 팀원들에게 아이스크림 돼지바를 나눠주자, 상사가 묻는다.. 벌개미취 군락지의 산책로 정비와 야생화 버스킹 공연장에 비가림 시설 설치를 통하여서 안전을 확보하고 식물원의 볼거리를 점차적으로 늘려가도록 하겠습니다..

근데 옛날에는 천민들은 성씨 자체가 없지 않았었나요, 사진 ‘킹받다’는 ‘열 받다’를 강조하기 위해 킹king왕을 접두어처럼 사용한 신조어다. 킹받쥬 재미있는 콘텐츠, 킹받쥬 개그콘서트, 킹받치와 관련 비디오, 킹받쥬 댄스 챌린지, 개그콘서트 인기 영상. 미래통합당 서울 강서을 후보로 나서는 김태우 전 청와대 특별감찰반 수사관이 24일 국회 정론관에 섰다, 미래통합당 서울 강서을 후보로 나서는 김태우 전 청와대 특별감찰반 수사관이 24일 국회 정론관에 섰다, 이번 포스팅에서는 ‘킹받다’의 뜻과 어떻게 사용되는지에 대해 친절하게 알아보겠습니다.

히토미 주디

오늘은 킹받네의 뜻에 대해 알아보았는데요 이렇게 유행하는 은어나 밈에 대해 알아보다 보면 정말 문화라는 것이 어떻게 생기고.. 일반적인 여객기는 조종석 윗부분이 동체의 일부분으로 되어있지만, 군용항공기, 특히 전투기 들은 윗부분이 투명한 재질로 덮여 있으며, 이 부분을 캐노피라고 부른다.. 오늘은 킹받네의 뜻에 대해 알아보았는데요 이렇게 유행하는 은어나 밈에 대해 알아보다 보면 정말 문화라는 것이 어떻게 생기고..

그게 우리 킹사이즈 침대의 반 이상을 차지하고, 밤늦게 껴안는 걸 방해하잖아. Com › national › weekend아무튼, 주말 귀여워서 ‘킹받는다’고. Net › 526이 말 모르면 z세대랑 소통 불가, 이번 시즌도 여러분들의 많은 관심과 응원 덕분에, 한번더 부장이라는 자리에 앉게 되었습니다, 킹받는다 뜻을 알아보아요 킹받네ㅡㅡ 네이버 블로그.

우리나라 성씨중에 축씨와 골씨도 있는것인가요. 한번더 부장이라는 자리에 앉게 되었습니다. Com › discover › 킹바쥬채효령tiktok, 웃긴 건, 남편이 내 임신 베개를 엄청 싫어해.

히토미 외계인

Com › sonic1873 › 222276352784킹받네 뜻과 유래 알아볼까요, 10 목 쫑받네 그럼 다음 시간에 만나요. 킹받는다 뜻을 알아보아요 킹받네ㅡㅡ 네이버 블로그, Com › entry › 한국어한국어 신조어 킹받다킹받네 뜻과 쓰임, 유래.

킹리적 갓심은 추측하기 매우 어렵죠, 안녕하십니까 문에이 부장 박재열 인사드립니다, 오늘은 물구나무서기에 대해서 포스팅해보려고 해요 여러분 물구나무서기 할 줄 아시나요, ㅎㅎ 킹은 매우를 뜻하며 갓은 god 신을 뜻합니다, Com › leeqdj › 222383813237신조어 킹받다 킹받네 뜻, 유래, 킹정, 킹리적갓심, 꼴받다, 자만추, 우리나라 성씨중에 축씨와 골씨도 있는것인가요.

히토미 파이즈리

예를 들면 요즘 유행하는 밈인 미안하다 이거 보여주려고 류의 어그로 글이나 폰은정 류의 어그로 글에 당했을 때 아 킹받네ㅡㅡ와 같이 사용할 수 있습니다. 저는 예전부터 물구나무서기를 하고 싶어서 연습했는데 드디어 성공했어요. ______________ 오늘의 trend a word는 어떠셨나요.

히토미 신음소리 요즘 한국에선 이럴 때 ‘킹받다’라고 해. 일반적인 여객기는 조종석 윗부분이 동체의 일부분으로 되어있지만, 군용항공기, 특히 전투기 들은 윗부분이 투명한 재질로 덮여 있으며, 이 부분을 캐노피라고 부른다. One legged king pigeon pose ii는 eka pada rajakapotasana iii와 유사하게 상체를 뒤로 구부리면서 low lunge pose를 기반으로 합니다. 여기까지 따라가는 것도 어려운데, 이젠 파생 버전으로 킹받드라슈. 요즘 보면 킹받네라는 말을 쓰는데요, 요즘 연예프로그램을 보면 킹받네라고 많이 하는데요. １８５５９７５

히토미 야근 드루킹 사건 이후 아직도 1000여명. 외다리 왕 비둘기 자세 ii 요가eka pada rajakapotasana ii. 그리고 우리나라 성씨중에 축씨와 골씨도 있는것인가요. 아프리카tv와 유튜브에서 활동하는 인터넷 방송인. 그리고 우리나라 성씨중에 축씨와 골씨도 있는것인가요. 히토미 엘프

히토미 불법 디시 Com › anssmm › 221960503415킹받네 뜻 킹받다 주펄 의미 알려드립니다 네이버 블로그. 벌개미취 군락지의 산책로 정비와 야생화 버스킹 공연장에 비가림 시설 설치를 통하여서 안전을 확보하고 식물원의 볼거리를 점차적으로 늘려가도록 하겠습니다. 오늘 분양연구소에서 알려드릴 지식은 킹받네 뜻과 주펄의 의미에 대해서 말씀드리겠습니다. Com › sonic1873 › 222276352784킹받네 뜻과 유래 알아볼까요. Newjeans이가 포함된 킹받치 @ooaall12 님의 동영상. 히토미 포켓몬 디시

히토미 클릭이 안됨 Com › anssmm › 221960503415킹받네 뜻 킹받다 주펄 의미 알려드립니다 네이버 블로그. 드루킹 사건 이후 아직도 1000여명. 오늘 분양연구소에서 알려드릴 지식은 킹받네 뜻과 주펄의 의미에 대해서 말씀드리겠습니다. 장병들의 전몰을 추도하기 위해 연설을 하였는데 이 연설의 내용은 물론 배열. 웃긴 건, 남편이 내 임신 베개를 엄청 싫어해.

히토미 크로스드레싱 Com › seonjong03 › 221920173920킹받네 뜻. 아래 구글폼만 작성하면 한 번씩 확인할 때 마다 초대해드려요. 오늘 분양연구소에서 알려드릴 지식은 킹받네 뜻과 주펄의 의미에 대해서 말씀드리겠습니다. 아무튼, 주말 귀여워서 킹받는다고 열받는다는 뜻의 변조어. 쿠팡이 추천하는 킹받치와 특가를 만나보세요.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.