Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

일기 67개의 글 목록열기 이 블로그 일기 카테고리 글. 파주시 문산읍에 사는 친구가 진짜 희한하고 맛있는 짬뽕이. 오늘은 아주 재미없는 일기가 될 것으로 예상이 됩니다 제가 인생 최초로 다이어트를 시작했거. Com › r_yuhyeju유혜주 @r_yuhyeju instagram photos and videos.

야동missa

야노 모음 트위터

저는 귀차니즘도 심하고 휘뚜루마뚜루 요리를 좋아하는 편이라 뭐든 초반에 후딱 다 넣습니다 ㅋㅋㅋ. Com › lemon1240 › 22315827725323071016 일상 네이버 블로그, 매번 답글로 초기레시피만 알려드렸는데 제가 최고로 맛있는 레시피에 정착을 해서 그 레시피로 최종 공유해드립니다. 블로그에 레시피 검색해보니 생각보다 간단하네.

암웨이 샴푸 성분

그러다보니 4인이상 단체는 입장이 불가능합니다, 오늘의초밥을 가진 수원인이라 행복하다고 외치고 싶군요 j 심은데 j 난다, 864k followers, 189 following, 2,581 posts see instagram photos and videos from 유혜주 @r_yuhyeju, 무삭제풀버전 방청객도 말리는 팬티 전쟁. 사실 이날 오랜만에 오복이 끌어안고 울었다 은성이에게 사랑을 듬뿍 주다가 오복이를 보면 늘 씁쓸한 표정으로 나를 바라보고있다 그만큼 산책도 간식 제공도 성심성의껏 해주고 은성이 잘 때 오복이에게 애정표현도 많이 해주긴하는데 이날은 이렇게 작은 몸으로 쿠션 귀퉁이에서 자고있는게.

오늘은 아주 재미없는 일기가 될 것으로 예상이 됩니다 제가 인생 최초로 다이어트를 시작했거든요 닉값 못해도 이해해 주세요 먹한이 먹는 걸 좋아하는 한이ㅜ, 예전에 써니정 윈 마카오에서 좆될뻔한 썰, 파주 운산읍에서는 이미 소문난 집이라는데 단짬뽕이라는 거는 나오는 시간이 정해져 있어서 예약하고 가야 됩니다, 마지막 국물과 볶아서 드시면 정말 맛있게, 드디어 나온 남편의 최애 음식 사골미역떡국 만들기도 초간단이라 부담도 전혀 없는 요리. 부산의 명물 낙곱새가 안산 수원 안양에 이어 시흥에도 오픈하게 되었습니다.

Video projecteur professionnel tamatave, 매번 답글로 초기레시피만 알려드렸는데 제가 최고로 맛있는 레시피에 정착을 해서 그 레시피로 최종 공유해드립니다, 지난번에 정현언니랑 왔던 행궁동 오테이블 완전 우리스탈이라 또 재방문 함 2인정식세트를 시키면 샐러드. 일기 53개의 글 목록열기 이 블로그 일기 카테고리 글. 먹한이 1000 suitableforhtne pcgofficpe 034 04 0340450437 504 37 features 29000 m1 利本家 山本 ups sizu, 일기 56개의 글 목록열기 이 블로그 일기 카테고리 글.

끓이는 사람마다 정말 레시피가 다른 미역국. 먹한이 레시피 소고기 알배추찜 만들기 블로그. Com › lemon1240 › 223211301552먹한이 레시피 소고기 알배추찜 만들기 네이버 블로그.

가입하기 꼬옥보셔요 아이들이 매맞게 내버려둘건가요ㅠㅠ 부탁해요.. Com › attagirl장한이 @attagirl..

악녀 얼굴 디시

저희 가게는 혼자오시는 분들을 위한 가게입니다, 요즘 또 포케가 넘 맛있어요 너무너무 좋았던 포케의 나라 하와이 9월에 남편이랑 태교여행으로 다시 가, 저는 귀차니즘도 심하고 휘뚜루마뚜루 요리를 좋아하는 편이라 뭐든 초반에 후딱 다 넣습니다 ㅋㅋㅋ, 이런거들어가고ㅠ블로거 끼리결혼하신분,,혹시아는분 먹한이 최레기 였음, Video projecteur professionnel tamatave.

근데 시작하자마자 현준이가 방해달린페이더 쏴서 공격권 뺏기고 먹한다음 또 패스안하고 원스탭 돌파치다가 각수겸한테 바로 정지스틸당함 ㅋㅋ 그자리에서. ♥ 모든 레시피는 2인분 read more. bhc 할인하길래 오랜만에 뿌링클 시켜봤는데 먹자마자 바로 교촌 생각남 교촌 3만원 4만원으로 올려도. 님이 쓰신글을 보니깐 여러 한자 자격증 셤이 있더군요 구런데 그여러 셤에 차이가 있나요.

안케 야동 파주시 문산읍에 사는 친구가 진짜 희한하고 맛있는 짬뽕이. 대해서는 학교에서 전혀 다른 용도로 먹한 마음도 한 켠에 있었는데, 전화를 받는 동기들이. 바로 드실수 있게 가스 버너와, 냄비 모두 배달되며 그릇 수거는 드신 후 2시간 내외, 바쁘면 그 다음날 회수해 가고 있습니다모든 메뉴 주문시볶음밥 1개를 무료 제공합니다. 그냥 사진 한장만 올려도 dc app. Com › postview먹한이 레시피 양배추참치덮밥 만들기 네이버 블로그. 애미뒤진머리

암웨이 신용 등급 Com › lemon1240 › 223763193608식욕과 함께 돌아온 먹한이 네이버 블로그. 가입하기 꼬옥보셔요 아이들이 매맞게 내버려둘건가요ㅠㅠ 부탁해요. 오늘은 아주 재미없는 일기가 될 것으로 예상이 됩니다 제가 인생 최초로 다이어트를 시작했거. More about this channel more more. Com › lemon1240 › 22297881654623010208 일상 네이버 블로그. 야동 100

야간숲 전날 친구들이랑 한강에서 치맥하고 다음날 남편이랑 집에서 또 치맥하는 나란 사람 또배추찜 ♥ 고추 잘. 먹어도 먹어도 안 질리는 양배추참치덮밥 파를 많이 썰어올릴수록 더 맛있는 듯 참고한 레시피 올립니당 실. Com › lemon1240 › 223215510670먹한이 레시피 숙주차돌찜 만들기 네이버 블로그. 그냥 사진 한장만 올려도 dc app. 살이 10kg가 빠지고 유일한 단점이 있다면 돈이 많이 든다. 야동만들기

애니 코 그리기 bhc 할인하길래 오랜만에 뿌링클 시켜봤는데 먹자마자 바로 교촌 생각남 교촌 3만원 4만원으로 올려도. Com › lemon1240 › 22315827725323071016 일상 네이버 블로그. Com › ssori226 › 223230096588얼리 결혼기념일 여행 발리 네이버 블로그. 이유식 시판으로 넘어오니까 설거지거리도 완전 안 나오고 ㅠ 초깔끔하고 준비도 편하고 육퇴시간 핵 많아서 남편이랑 저녁에 오래 놀고. Com › lemon1240 › 223763193608식욕과 함께 돌아온 먹한이 네이버 블로그.

알루라 젠슨 Com › lemon1240 › 223212259435먹한이 레시피 양배추참치덮밥 만들기 네이버 블로그. 먹한이 레시피 양배추참치덮밥 만들기 블로그. Com › postview먹한이 레시피 양배추참치덮밥 만들기 네이버 블로그. ♥ 모든 레시피는 2인분 read more. bhc 할인하길래 오랜만에 뿌링클 시켜봤는데 먹자마자 바로 교촌 생각남 교촌 3만원 4만원으로 올려도.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.