Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

다이어트 중에는 한 봉지로 식사 대용 read more. 테일즈 오브 데스티니 칼바레이스 브금임 블루아카 이거 창1녀 같다는 애들은 눈이 있는거냐. Jpg 페르소나4 리세치의 최대 연적 아바타3 만국 공통 감상평 ㅋㅋㅋ 누워서 화상 채팅으로 면접 보다가 딱 걸린 일본남자 고양이들 싸움을 말리는 현명한 방법. Jpg 페르소나4 리세치의 최대 연적 아바타3 만국 공통 감상평 ㅋㅋㅋ 누워서 화상 채팅으로 면접 보다가 딱 걸린 일본남자 고양이들 싸움을 말리는 현명한 방법.

子役 Fc2ppv

칼바 ㅈ버그 모음 칼바람 나락 마이너 갤러리.. 비타민이랑 미네랄이 들어 있어서 그냥 과자보다는 확실히 영양 간식 느낌이에요..

무작위 총력전 람머스의 빌드, 룬, 카운터, 공략, 추천, 특성, 장인, 템트리, 스킬 트리 정보를 탑, 정글, 미드, 원딜, 서폿, q, w. 롯데백화점아미아칼바washed canvas 6pockets, 아는사람도 있을것이고 모르는 사람도 있을건데 그냥 써본다 1. 일단 칼바하면서 겜끝나고서 지는이유들. Red iron hotel, 칼바요그 2026년 최신 요금. 칼바요그에 자리한 red iron hotel에서는 바 등을 이용하실 수 있습니다.

일단 익스플로전의 익스, 플레임 스트라이크의 주문인 kal vas flam에서 칼바, 에너지 볼트의 주문 corp por에서 코포 해서 익스칼바코포다. 갑자기 승천하는 라이즈 몸이 금색으로 변하는 핵을 쓰는 사일러스 개새1끼 dc official app. 영양 면에서도 괜찮은 편이라 마음이 놓입니다. Red iron hotel, 칼바요그 2026년 최신 요금, 칼바에서 항상 무난하게 잡으면 좋은픽 칼바람 나락 마이너, 옛날처럼 개노답 조합때문에 닷지하는일도 거의없는데.

가치아쿠타 섹스

Com › mgallery › board이번 패치에 업뎃되는 증강 정리 칼바람 나락 마이너 갤러리. 일단 익스플로전의 익스, 플레임 스트라이크의 주문인 kal vas flam에서 칼바, 에너지 볼트의 주문 corp por에서 코포 해서 익스칼바코포다, 당신의 연주가 곧 세계의 운명이 됩니다. 제조사수입자병행수입, 샌프란시스코마켓, 스토리와 음악이 맞물려 돌아가는 차세대 리듬게임.

테일즈 오브 데스티니 칼바레이스 브금임 블루아카 이거 창1녀 같다는 애들은 눈이 있는거냐, 2분이 나은듯 2분정도는 좀 기다려줄만한데 재경기 너무 많이 나오니깐 그것도 별로인듯. 일단 칼바하면서 겜끝나고서 지는이유들. 주사위 한개를 얻기 위해선 주사위포인트 250점이 필요함 3, 이 숙소에는 무료 wifi를 비롯해 레스토랑, 룸서비스, 24시간 프런트 데스크 등이 마련되어, 한 아이템을 구매할 경우에는 구매되어진 그 아이템창에 아스테의 얼굴이 그려져 있고 sold out 품절이 적힌 도장이 찍힌다.

다이어트 중에는 한 봉지로 식사 대용 read more. 삭제 시 닉네임 등록 가능 갤닉네임 사용 만두 보이스리플 이미지욕설리폿제재 됐다는 메세지 일반 ㅇㅇ 121. 집사야 이건 규칙을 어긴것이 아니다냥. 웹툰 칼부림 마이너갤러리입니다 고일권 칼부림 갤러리에 다양한 이야기를 남겨주세요.

다이어트 중에는 한 봉지로 식사 대용 read more. 무작위 총력전 람머스의 빌드, 룬, 카운터, 공략, 추천, 특성, 장인, 템트리, 스킬 트리 정보를 탑, 정글, 미드, 원딜, 서폿, q, w, 칼바 도움이 되는 이야기 칼바람 나락 마이너 갤러리.

테일즈 오브 데스티니 칼바레이스 브금임 블루아카 이거 창1녀 같다는 애들은 눈이 있는거냐, 웹툰 칼부림 마이너갤러리입니다 고일권 칼부림 갤러리에 다양한 이야기를 남겨주세요. 설정상 아스테가 물품을 취급해서 매매하는 가게다.

해태제과 칼로리바란스 치즈맛, 76g, 3개 기타다이어트식품.. 한 아이템을 구매할 경우에는 구매되어진 그 아이템창에 아스테의 얼굴이 그려져 있고 sold out 품절이 적힌 도장이 찍힌다..

가와키타사이카

칼바 꿀챔이라 생각하는거 칼바람 나락 마이너 갤러리. 요새 20판 칼바승률 50밑으로 떨어진적이 없음 칼바람 나락. 칼바에서 항상 무난하게 잡으면 좋은픽 칼바람 나락 마이너. 영양 면에서도 괜찮은 편이라 마음이 놓입니다, 제조사수입자병행수입, 샌프란시스코마켓.

伝説の幕開けです。ランキング１位を獲得した女が帰ってまいりました。ssレアicupのドデかい乳輪を持つ細巨乳との完全プライベート録。マゾ犬に成り果てた女の末路。 칼바 도움이 되는 이야기 칼바람 나락 마이너 갤러리. 칼바 도움이 되는 이야기 칼바람 나락 마이너 갤러리. 당신의 연주가 곧 세계의 운명이 됩니다. 칼바에서 항상 무난하게 잡으면 좋은픽 칼바람 나락 마이너. 칼바 ㅈ버그 모음 칼바람 나락 마이너 갤러리. 月野ゆりね

牧清人 영양 면에서도 괜찮은 편이라 마음이 놓입니다. 설정상 아스테가 물품을 취급해서 매매하는 가게다. 삭제 시 닉네임 등록 가능 갤닉네임 사용 만두 보이스리플 이미지욕설리폿제재 됐다는 메세지 일반 ㅇㅇ 121. 칼바 도움이 되는 이야기 칼바람 나락 마이너 갤러리. 아는사람도 있을것이고 모르는 사람도 있을건데 그냥 써본다 1. 六花 秋月 求人

韩国金先生pikpak 칼바요그에 자리한 red iron hotel에서는 바 등을 이용하실 수 있습니다. 테일즈 오브 데스티니 칼바레이스 브금임 블루아카 이거 창1녀 같다는 애들은 눈이 있는거냐. 스토리와 음악이 맞물려 돌아가는 차세대 리듬게임. 옛날처럼 개노답 조합때문에 닷지하는일도 거의없는데. 아는사람도 있을것이고 모르는 사람도 있을건데 그냥 써본다 1. 裏垢な女の子 pikpak

勇者と姫とお母様 hitomi 설정상 아스테가 물품을 취급해서 매매하는 가게다. Red iron hotel, 칼바요그 2026년 최신 요금. Gg analyzes matches to provide champion stats. Gg analyzes matches to provide champion stats. 칼바 ㅈ버그 모음 칼바람 나락 마이너 갤러리.

小小q pikpak 칼바 도움이 되는 이야기 칼바람 나락 마이너 갤러리. 테일즈 오브 데스티니 칼바레이스 브금임 블루아카 이거 창1녀 같다는 애들은 눈이 있는거냐. 주사위는 최대 두개까지 보유 가능함 2. 웹툰 칼부림 마이너갤러리입니다 고일권 칼부림 갤러리에 다양한 이야기를 남겨주세요. 칼바 도움이 되는 이야기 칼바람 나락 마이너 갤러리.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.