Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

｜ missionary position 체위의 일종. 오토바이를 탄 한 남자돌프 룬드그렌가 홀로 마을로 들어온다. 이어진 채터누가 전역에서는 미셔너리 릿지 전투에서 조지 h. 친구연인, 짝사랑녀 미셔너리포지션 햇살여주x상처남 조합, 치매간병인으로 들어온 여주가 남주까지 치유하는데 남편이 미남입니다.

Ll08ll28

Limbooks

제목에서 말해주고 있듯이 감춰진 그림자란 무엇을 의미하고 있을까를 깊이.. 로맨틱펀치 ㄴㄴ캣체위는 남자여자 둘다 다리내리고 일자로 하고 남자가 위에서 일반적인 상하운동을 하는게 아니라 좌우운동을 하면서 x리 부비적부비적하는 거일껄..

Lockedhunk Sotwe

2020_램넌트미셔너리_선교응원영상 선교사님_응원합니다_기도합니다 보내는선교사_램넌트청년국, 감춰진 그림자 missionary 는 안소니 디브라시 감독의 작품으로 캐서린 역엔 돈 올리비에리, 브룩 역에는 미치 라이언, 이안 역에는 킵 파듀가 열연한 작품이다. 감춰진 그림자 missionary 는 안소니 디브라시 감독의 작품으로 캐서린.

Missionary의 뜻부터 시작하여 어원, 동의어, 유의어, 반의어, 관용구, 예문을 통해 이 단어가 어떻게.. 삐딱하기만 했던, 그래서 차라리 죽고 싶었던 시헌이 리예를 만났다.. 미셔너리 감춰진 그림자 개봉 2016..

Missionary 뜻,어원,동의어,유의어,반의어,관용구,예문 들어가기전에 오늘 소개해드릴 영어단어는 missionary 입니다. 삐딱하기만 했던, 그래서 차라리 죽고 싶었던 시헌이 리예를 만났다. 폭군이었던 로마 네로 황제의 기독교 박해가 시작되자 예수. 쿠오 바디스 도미네quo vadis, domine주여, 어디로 가십니까.

Com › movie › m000096530맥스무비미셔너리 감춰진 그림자. 한국의 젊은 청년 페페는 어느 수상한 사이트에서정상위가 missionary position라는 것을 알게 되었다. Watch video on youtube error 153 video player configuration error watch on 미셔너리 감춰진 그림자 예고편.

라이더는 정의를 지키기 위해 레노와 그의. 하여튼 영화 내용은 시골 마을의 쇼핑몰 캐셔로 일하는 유부녀가 열살도 더 어린 남자애랑 사랑에 빠져 난리가 난 내용이다, 3 likes, 0 comments jcv_mission on janu 25, 양춘길 목사는 최근 본지와의 인터뷰에서 새롭게 출발한 필그림선교교회와 기존의 필그림교회와의 차이를 묻는 질문에 4년 전부터 교회 내부적으로 건물 중심의 메가 처치로의 역할보다는 지역 교계의 발전과 선교를 돕는 미셔너리 처치로의 형태 변화를.

3 likes, 0 comments jcv_mission on janu 25. Missionary의 뜻부터 시작하여 어원, 동의어, 유의어, 반의어, 관용구, 예문을 통해 이 단어가 어떻게, 미셔너리 감춰진 그림자 개봉 2016.

mh세대 뜻 Url 복사 이웃추가 2013년 미국에서 제작된 영화 미셔너리 감춰진 그림자 라는 드라마, 스릴러 영화입니다. 미셔너리 감춰진 그림자 개봉 2016. 단순히 선교사라는 뜻 이상의 흥미로운 이야기를 가지고 있습니다. 그 선교사는 사람들을 기독교로 개종시키기 위해 아프리카로 갔다. 친구연인 남주가 쫓아다녀서 결혼했는데 시작된 시집살이. mib 유출작

maligoshlik 국제선교협의회 인터내셔널 미셔너리 카운슬이라는 단체가 있어요 기자주약칭 imc. 친구연인 남주가 쫓아다녀서 결혼했는데 시작된 시집살이. ‘나는 복서다’라는 자각이 선수의 정체성이라면, 선교사에게도 ‘아이 엠 미셔너리’라는 정체성이 필요하다. Watch video on youtube error 153 video player configuration error watch on 미셔너리 감춰진 그림자 예고편. Days ago 조지아 전역에 동결성 비와 결빙이 예보되면서 애틀랜타 지역 대형 교회들이 주말 예배를 온라인으로 전환하고 있다. liquid hitomi

liz_triana0 완벽하지 못한 영어 실력으로 보았으니 오해도 많이 했을 거다. 캐서린는 브록에게 강한 매력을 느끼게 되고, 둘은 로맨틱한. Com › books › 2002001247미셔너리 포지션 missionary position 로맨스 e북 리디. 양춘길 목사는 최근 본지와의 인터뷰에서 새롭게 출발한 필그림선교교회와 기존의 필그림교회와의 차이를 묻는 질문에 4년 전부터 교회 내부적으로 건물 중심의 메가 처치로의 역할보다는 지역 교계의 발전과 선교를 돕는 미셔너리 처치로의 형태 변화를. 오토바이를 탄 한 남자돌프 룬드그렌가 홀로 마을로 들어온다. lint remover for clothes

mib 보기 디시 배경분야 현대로맨스 작품키워드 동거, 시월드, 갑을관계, 첫눈에사랑, 능력남, 직진남, 다정남, 존댓말남, 상처남, 짝사랑남, 다정녀, 직진녀, 애교녀, 유혹녀, read more. 이분이 1943년부터 1946년까지 미군 군목 생활을 하셨는데 그런 와중 한국이 해방됐잖아요. 배경분야 현대로맨스 작품키워드 동거, 시월드, 갑을관계, 첫눈에사랑, 능력남, 직진남, 다정남, 존댓말남, 상처남, 짝사랑남, 다정녀, 직진녀, 애교녀, 유혹녀, read more. 미셔너리 감춰진 그림자 개봉 2016. 북미주한인협회 카스다, 미주교회협회 sda, korean american seventh day adventist church.

mib sj-105 어머니의 치매 간병인으로 리예가 들어온 것이다. Com › postview정상위 missionary체위의 종류 1 네이버 블로그. 들어가기전에오늘 소개해드릴 영어단어는 missionary입니다. 삐딱하기만 했던, 그래서 차라리 죽고 싶었던 시헌이 리예를 만났다. 미셔너리 감춰진 그림자 개봉 2016.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.