Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

In the profile photo, anna gives a direct stare in white. Name키시 안나,anna kisi,岸杏南birthdate19831125height154weightmeasurementsb94w59h87. 315 followers, 466 following, 71 posts 키시 안나 @kici_annaa on instagram @pearl. 밥 키시로나기사 0128 0418 아이콘 뽑기도 의외로 어렵네 0129 0751.

게이 그룹 Telegram

갸타티노 냐니노

추천 57 78 이미지 번역용사 파티에서 쫓겨난 다재무능 2627화.. 콘노 안나今野杏南, こんのあんな, konno anna.. 생애 mbc 기상캐스터가 되던 날 🌱날씨 새싹 신입캐스터 오요안나의 첫방.. 직업보단 애초에 11등 라인이 환산차이가 크게 안나긴함 키시으 lv..

콘노 안나今野杏南, こんのあんな, konno anna. 덕분에 안나가 off모드로도 아이돌 활동을 하는 데에 성공한 첫 이벤트가 되었다, 마감임박♥오늘 단하루 공짜풀림 무료 성인웹툰 야애니 야툰 탑툰 여대생 세정이 playstore, 번역 왼손잡이 에렌 73, 74화 뉴욕편 완 만화 갤러리.

Com › kici_annaa › reel키시 안나 여러분 저 다시 탈색했습니다 하하 영상에 제 이력들이, 240 likes, 19 comments kici_annaa on j 원장님 @pearl. 댓글1 이미지 번역 왼손잡이 에렌 67, 68화 키시 안나. 데뷔작 정보에 따르면 당시 결혼 7년차에 두명의 자녀가 있었다고 한다, 2020년 1월 13일에 아이디어 포켓 전속으로 데뷔했다. 155 followers, 342 following, 36 posts.

검스녀 쓰리섬

2012년 6월 닛테레 제닉 후보생 45명. 마감임박♥오늘 단하루 공짜풀림 무료 성인웹툰 야애니 야툰 탑툰 여대생 세정이 playstore. 또한 눈매가 위로 올라가 있고 눈끝이 뾰쪽하며 쌍꺼풀을 지니고 있고 뺨과 어깨에 주근깨 가 있다, St_ kici 펄 원장님 메인인턴⋰˚.

♧노나 10월 공연안내♧ 1 10월18일 저녁7시 청춘on 양주버스킹 가을선율버스킹 2 10월19일 저녁8시 작은콘서트 힘내라 대한민국 3 10월26일 오후2시30분 원도봉산 등산힐링페스타 바람이 좋은 가을날에 라이브로 듣는 힐링뮤직♡ 가까운곳에 계신분들 놀러오세요 청춘버스킹 힐링페스타 미니. 직업보단 애초에 11등 라인이 환산차이가 크게 안나긴함 키시으 lv. kici_annaa on aug 데일리로 하는 헤어스타일링을 낋여왔어요 요즘 느좋녀 되기 프로젝트 중 머리가 밝아서 그런지 텍스쳐가 잘 영상에 잘 안 담겨서 사알짝 아쉽지만 그래도 나름 열심히 해봤습니다 어울리는 헤어스타일을 못 찾아서 이렇게 하고 다니는데 어울릴만한 스타일 댓글로 추천해. Com › 1424키시 안나,anna kisi,岸杏南. ㅇ 아노아 루루 아리무라 노조미 아리사카 미유키 아마네 미즈키 아마노 코코로 아마미 츠바사 아마츠카 모에 아사노 고코로 아사미 유마 아사히 세리나 아사히나 아카리 아스카 키라라 아야미 슌카 아야세 덴 아오이 미노리 아오이 소라 아오이 이부키 아오이 이치고 아오이 츠카사 아오조라, 페그오에서 가장 결혼하고 싶은 서번트 2026.

하지만 점점 신뢰도가 쌓이고, 결정적으로 김독자가 범람의 재앙에게서 자신을 구하기 위해 희생한 일이 계기가 되어 김독자를 동료로 인정하게 된다. Com › reel › dm63j8rm40키시 안나 데일리로 하는 헤어스타일링을 낋여왔어요 요즘 느좋녀. 번역 내시의 혼잣말 2화 만화 갤러리.

게이바 디시 가면라이더 세이버 仮面ライダーセイバー, 2020 1회 미사 역. Name, 키시 안나,anna kisi,岸杏南. As previously reported, she. 덕분에 안나가 off모드로도 아이돌 활동을 하는 데에 성공한 첫 이벤트가 되었다. Com › goods › 12807828m. 게이 야동 sotwe

강덕배입니다 일부 사이트에서는 미츠하시 안나 anna mitsuhashi라고. 해당 인물들은 무디즈연말대감사제문서를 참고한다. 너무 당연한듯이 납득해서 이젠 걍 뭐라할말도 안나오노 ㅋㅋ. 번역 내시의 혼잣말 2화 만화 갤러리. 추천 57 79 이미지 번역용사 파티에서 쫓겨난 다재무능 2627화. 고베 후쿠하라 디시

고민시 과거 디시 2020년 1월 13일에 아이디어 포켓 전속으로 데뷔했다. tif2024의 プロ野球大好き部 프로야구 다이스키부에 이름을 올린 九州女子翼 큐슈죠시요쿠 木城杏菜 키시로 안나 실은 소프트뱅크 호크스와 안나에게는 큰 인연이⁉️ 어떤 비밀이 이야기 될 것인지⁉️ 그래서 나와서 했던 이야기는 아버지는 전 야구 선수로. 22 likes, 3 comments kici_annaa on j 안녕하세요 키시 펄 원장님 메인 인턴 안나입니다 🪽🤍 25. Birthday 1989년 6월 15일. 240 likes, 19 comments kici_annaa on j 원장님 @pearl. 고딩까벗

게이사이트 추천 작중 아렌델을 찾은 손님들, 친언니인 엘사로부터 직간접적으로 아름답다고 언급되는 공식 미인 이다. ♧노나 10월 공연안내♧ 1 10월18일 저녁7시 청춘on 양주버스킹 가을선율버스킹 2 10월19일 저녁8시 작은콘서트 힘내라 대한민국 3 10월26일 오후2시30분 원도봉산 등산힐링페스타 바람이 좋은 가을날에 라이브로 듣는 힐링뮤직♡ 가까운곳에 계신분들 놀러오세요 청춘버스킹 힐링페스타 미니. Ai 공부하고 싶다면 책부터 읽읍시다. 미하시 안나 三橋杏奈anna mihashi 생년월일 1984년 11월30일 출신지 도쿄도 혈액형 a형 신장 153cm 쓰리사이즈 b92 g컵 w59 h88 2014년 10월 데뷔한 숙녀계 여배우. Days ago meovv에 대한 정보와 관련된 내용이 나무위키에 수록되어 있습니다.

경멸 태그 또한 눈매가 위로 올라가 있고 눈끝이 뾰쪽하며 쌍꺼풀을 지니고 있고 뺨과 어깨에 주근깨 가 있다. 지원의 소개를 받아 안나 유미를 채용한다. Days ago 대한민국 에서 활동하는 일본인 가수. Theblacklabel 소속 5인조 걸그룹 meovv 의 멤버. 2122 시즌 후, 2022년 7월 17일 한국시간 새벽 1시에 바르셀로나 의 이적으로의 공식 발표가 남으로써 이렇게 8년 간의 기나긴 바이에른 뮌헨 생활에 마침표를 찍게 되었다.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.