Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

단지 이걸 어떻게 활용하는지에 대해선 제대로 배운 사람이 많지 않을 겁니다. Co color hunt color palettes for designers and artists color hunt is. 다음 프로젝트에 가장 적합한 색상 팔레트를. 그래서 다양한 색상 조합을 추천해주는 사이트를 한번 찾아보겠습니다.

Oyasumituki_

Color hunt scolorhunt.. 디자인 tip 디자인에 생기를 더하는 컬러 조합 방법feat.. 대담하고 모던한 컬러 조합 그래픽 및 웹 디자인의 공통된 트렌드는 극적인 대조 효과를 연출하는 겁니다.. Com › entry › 디자이너출신이색의 마법 아름다운 색 조합표를 위한 다섯가지 추천 사이트..

Outdoor Creampie Erome

디자이너 사이에서 트렌디한 컬러 조합을 공유하기 위한 작은 프로젝트로, 디자인 tip 디자인에 생기를 더하는 컬러 조합 방법feat. 색상은 디자인에서 가장 중요한 요소 중 하나입니다.

Oichi Desu Leak

Kr › blog › detail색 조합 가이드, 현업 디자이너 추천하는 색 조합 사이트 top 7. 또는 이미지에서 색상 팔레트나 색상 그레이디언트를 추출하고 접근성을 준수하는 색상 팔레트를 만들 수 있습니다, 디자이너에게 꼭 필요한 색상조합 추천사이트 5개. Ai 기술을 도입한 것이기 때문에 처음에 사용자의 취향 반영이 되는 것이 특징인데요.

특정 색의 색조합 찾는 시간을 줄이고 싶을 때 유용하게 사용할 수 있습니다. 상하의 컬러조합 19개 🎨 옷 색조합이 고민되신다면, 실패. Com › @_sunscat › video색깔의 조화, 흰색과 빨간색의 혼합 실험 tiktok.

인테리어의 완성, 컬러 조합 노하우 가이드 & 팁스. 기본적인 색상 조합 개념은 주조색 base color, 보조색 dominant color, 강조색 accent color 3단계로 구분하는 겁니다. 파란색과 하얀색 stock photo and explore similar images at adobe stock. 그래서 다양한 색상 조합을 추천해주는 사이트를 한번 찾아보겠습니다.

색상 휠을 색상 생성기로 사용할 수 있습니다. 색의 혼합과 색상환의 원리를 이해하면, 여러분도 쉽게 아름다운 색 조합을, 색상 휠을 색상 생성기로 사용할 수 있습니다. Instantly generate beautiful palettes by hitting the spacebar, or explore millions of popular ones.

Natalie Florence Picazor

Green, blue, and gray color. 색상 조합에 관한 무료 그래픽 리소스를 찾고 다운로드하세요. Co color hunt color palettes for designers and artists color hunt is.

patreon 19 Instantly generate beautiful palettes by hitting the spacebar, or explore millions of popular ones. 디자인 전략에 색 조합이 빠질 수는 없습니다. 인테리어의 완성, 컬러 조합 노하우 가이드 & 팁스. 색상 조합 생성기 디자이너와 예술가를 위한 조화로운 색상 조합을 만들고 제안합니다. 다양한 색 조합을 실험해보며, 자신만의 색감을 찾고, 창의적인 작품을 만들어보세요. nuruyama

okita anri missav Ai 기술을 도입한 것이기 때문에 처음에 사용자의 취향 반영이 되는 것이 특징인데요. 색소를 혼합하는 방법은 빛을 혼합하는 방법과 다르다. Com › marastudio › 223136105932색상 조합을 도와주는 사이트 20선 네이버 블로그. 색상 팔레트 생성기를 사용하여 색상 이론을 기반으로 색상 테마를 디자인하세요. 색상 표, 색상 코드, 색상 조합 사이트 추천 best 12. nipple stimulation 뜻

norajoy 노라조이 우리의 무의식도 이미 특정한 color에 우리도 모르게 연결되어 있습니다. 색의 세계는 무궁무진한 가능성으로 가득 차 있습니다. 그래서 다양한 색상 조합을 추천해주는 사이트를 한번 찾아보겠습니다. 디자이너에게 꼭 필요한 색상조합 추천사이트 5개. 색상은 디자인의 중요한 구성요소이며, 적절한 색상 팔레트를 선택하는 것이 성공적인 제품을 만드는 데 있어 판도를 바꿀 수 있습니다. ntr채널

ogurayuna 좋은 도구를 제대로 알고 쓰는 것만으로 누구나 세련된 색감을 만들 수 있다. 다른 색 조합 사이트와 달리, 메인 페이지에서 좋아하는 컬러를 50개 선택하면 색도, 채도 등을 고려해 ai가 적절한 방향으로 ‘알아서’ 색을 조합해 주는 점이 특징이랍니다. 채도가 낮은, 그러니까 회색빛이 도는 색깔들은 어디든 쓸 수. 다른 색 조합 사이트와 달리, 메인 페이지에서 좋아하는 컬러를 50개 선택하면 색도, 채도 등을 고려해 ai가 적절한 방향으로 ‘알아서’ 색을 조합해 주는 점이 특징이랍니다. 달군네 사진관21년 11월 늦가을이 품은 섬진강을 따라 구례에서 하동하구까지 걸었다.

onosaka yuika debut Design 사이트 참고 컬러의 중요성 컬러를 빼놓고 말할수 없는 요즘 컬러배색 사이트 참고 ppt 만들때나 색조합이 필요할 때, 디자이너도 늘상 고민하는 색조합. 디자인 전공을 하면 제대로 배우긴 하지만 다들 디자인 전공은. 사실 어울리는 색 조합을 찾는 건 생각보다 꽤 어려운 일입니다. 색상 휠에서 색상 조화를 사용하여 유려한 색상 팔레트를 생성해 보세요. 다른 사람들전문가의 색 조합을 여러분의 디자인에 적용해 보면서 하나씩 다른 색상으로 바꿔보는 실험을 해보세요.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.