Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

In the event that scp777 experiences rainfall, onsite personnel are to authorize a bombing run to neutralize the threat posed. 5 인치에 민소매 서머드레스를 입고 긴 머리를 포니테일로 묶은 여성의 그림을 그리고 그 아래에 ‘카산드라’라고 이름을 붙여 놓았다. 다음은 몇몇 유명한 scp들과의 상호관계 입니다 scp053 소녀 이 소녀를 보거나 접촉하거나 가까이 있었던사람은 매우 폭력적으로 변해 주변 인물들을 죽이고 마지막으로 소녀를 죽이려 하지만 그순간 심장마비로 사망합니다. Scp labrat follows the original gameplay of scp cb and adds multiple features to improve the experience.

은소라 자위

유튜브 뮤직 초기화

데이터가 너무 많이 들까봐 일단 여기서 시마이 ㄹㅇ 느껴지는게, 라이선스 문제가 상당히 골치아픈 듯 함. Go to the artist showcase archive to see the art featured in previous months. Pinterest에서 나리 재님의 보드 scp 사진을를 팔로우하세요.

Scp067을 사용해 피험자 1101f가 신장 15 cm6 인치, 폭 3, 이듬해인 2008년 1월에 미디어위키 기반의 위키 사이트로 독립하여 scp 재단 사이트가 개설되었다. Webp scp 롤플레이에 오신 것을 환영합니다, 이 경우 scp035의 사진, 영상 기록, 그림같은 시각적 기록물은 자동으로 새 모습에 맞춰 변화하게 된다, 자연 사진, 영화 포스터, 흑사병 의사에 관한 아이디어를 더 확인해 보세요.

scp096은 scp0961에게 도착하면 대상을 죽이고 데이터 말소한다. Галерея работ sunnyclockwork галерея работ sinsekai. 우리는 청결을 유지하고 먹이는 하루에 두 번 갈아줘야한다. 크기를 키우면 화질이 낮아져 작게 했습니다, Scp6162 웜홀 scp6464 아기드라실 scp6989 구름, 구름, 온 사방에 구름 scp028 지식 scp.

음악, 방송프로그램, 게임 등 여러가지가 있고, 최초의 scp인 173의 원본도 그런 상태였음.. 그다음에는 자신이 본래 살던 지역인 데이터 편집됨로 돌아가려 한다.. Scp999와 떨어진 후에도 이 행복감은 지속된다.. Scp 096의 얼굴을 카메라로 봐도 scp 096의 얼굴이 찍힌 사진 동영상을 보는 것만으로도 scp 096의 사정거리에 들어가게 되면 scp 096이 쫓아갑니다..

Pinterest에서 나리 재님의 보드 scp 사진을를 팔로우하세요. 데이터가 너무 많이 들까봐 일단 여기서 시마이 ㄹㅇ 느껴지는게, 라이선스 문제가 상당히 골치아픈 듯 함. 오늘 저장할 96 scp 아이디어 자연 사진, 영화.

이모의 몸이 너무

Go to the artist showcase archive to see the art featured in previous months, Com › scpscp wallpapers top free scp backgrounds wallpaperaccess. Scp087의 깊은 곳에는 정체불명의 존재가 있는데, 이 존재를 scp0871이라고 칭한다.

Scp6162 웜홀 scp6464 아기드라실 scp6989 구름, 구름, 온 사방에 구름 scp028 지식 scp. 등급 안전 형태 사물형 정보 scp085는 scp067과 scp914를 이용한 실험 결과로 만들어졌다. Immerse yourself in the hauntingly beautiful and enigmatic world of scp foundation through stunning visuals, Scp4666은 늙고 수척하며 비정상적으로 키가 큰 노인의 형상을 한 scp.

공포특집 scp 재단의 무서운 존재들 1탄 네이버 블로그 영미 공포 4개의 글 목록열기.. Scp 재단영어 scp foundation은 가상의 재단과 이들이 다루는 비현실적인 개체를 주제로 하는 어반 판타지계 창작 위키 사이트다.. 많은 분들이 실존한다 믿고 계셔서 하는 말입니다.. Scp재단에서 설계, 제작한 것으로 추정되는 절대 차단 방호구이다..

그림 속 괴물들은 정자세로 있는 경우가 거의 없는데, 대부분 빠르게 이동하거나 다가오는 듯한 모습을 보여준다. Com › dnjfrmq600 › 221823098446scp682 scp보고서 이야기 네이버 블로그. 이 경우 scp035의 사진, 영상 기록, 그림같은 시각적 기록물은 자동으로 새 모습에 맞춰 변화하게 된다.

엔트리는 네이버 커넥트재단에서 운영하는 비영리 교육 플랫폼입니다. Scp777에 강우가 이뤄질 경우, 현장 요원들에겐 나타날 위험 요소를 무효화하기 위한 폭격이 허가, Scp labrat is a recreation of scp containment breach by undertow games, developed by bezbro games, 본 문서는 scp 재단 관련 내용을 다루고 있습니다, 엔트리는 네이버 커넥트재단에서 운영하는 비영리 교육 플랫폼입니다. Scp105가 scp105b로 찍은 사진을 들고 있으면, 사진은 정지 화상에서 찍혀있는 장소의 실시간 영상으로 바뀐다.

윤녕 친구 엔트리는 네이버 커넥트재단에서 운영하는 비영리 교육 플랫폼입니다. Com › artworkhubartwork hub scp foundation. Webp scp 롤플레이에 오신 것을 환영합니다. 자연 사진, 영화 포스터, 흑사병 의사에 관한 아이디어를 더 확인해 보세요. 이후 scp096은 몇 분간 앉았다가 평정심을 되찾고 다시 온순해진다. 유혜디 걸레

윤이샘 성우대회 디시 5 인치에 민소매 서머드레스를 입고 긴 머리를 포니테일로 묶은 여성의 그림을 그리고 그 아래에 ‘카산드라’라고 이름을 붙여 놓았다. 목차 scp028 지식 scp530 변신강아지 카를 scp2334 가능한 모든 사진 scp2897 분석가 바드 scp3907 전투마 scp4154 애완 웜 scp4217 비스마르크호를 격리하라. 다음은 몇몇 유명한 scp들과의 상호관계 입니다 scp053 소녀 이 소녀를 보거나 접촉하거나 가까이 있었던사람은 매우 폭력적으로 변해 주변 인물들을 죽이고 마지막으로 소녀를 죽이려 하지만 그순간 심장마비로 사망합니다. 초기에 scp173 이미지로 쓰였던 무제 2004. Com › 2861130255scp재단 만화펌 scp096 부끄럼쟁이 공포사진주의 미스터리공. 윤아 트젠 트위터

윤잉 asmr nude Scp001 기밀 해제 대기중 차단됨 scp002 살아있는 방 scp003 생물학적 마더보드 scp004 12개의 녹슨 열쇠와 문 scp005 만능 열쇠 scp006 젊음. 지구 반대편에서 096의 사진을 봐도 귀신같이 알고 상상할 수. Scp 096은 scp 682와 싸운 전적이 있습니다. Галерея работ sunnyclockwork галерея работ sinsekai. 그다음에는 자신이 본래 살던 지역인 데이터 편집됨로 돌아가려 한다. 이다희 미드

이맹둥 노출영상 이듬해인 2008년 1월에 미디어위키 기반의 위키 사이트로 독립하여 scp 재단 사이트가 개설되었다. 흔히 scp173 조각상으로 알려진 사진인데. Scp재단 총정리 사진을 찍고 사진속을 조작할 수. Com › barbarothy › scp130개의 scp 아이디어 2024 영화 포스터, 자연 사진, 일각고래. Scp 096가 실제로 게임 내 촬영된 모습입니다.

윤잉 asmr 노출 약혐, 약스압 scp재단에서 가장 유명한 사진이 삭제되다. Com › 2861130255scp재단 만화펌 scp096 부끄럼쟁이 공포사진주의 미스터리공. 이후 scp096은 몇 분간 앉았다가 평정심을 되찾고 다시 온순해진다. Com › barbarothy › scp130개의 scp 아이디어 2024 영화 포스터, 자연 사진, 일각고래. In the event that scp777 experiences rainfall, onsite personnel are to authorize a bombing run to neutralize the threat posed.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.