연극계에서 뮤지컬 배우로 활동을 시작했으며, 이후 영화와 tv 시리즈 등 스크린 분야로 활동 영.

Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

그는 겉으로는 강하고 완벽한 군인처럼 보이지만, 내면에는 자신이 진짜로 원하는 삶을. 리암 본인은 이번 앨범이 본격적으로 솔로 커리어를 시작하는 것이라기보다는 자신의 미공개 곡을 공개하는 느낌에 가깝다고 설명했다. 리암 니슨이랑 파멜라 앤더슨 사귄대 rmillennials. Sbs 옛날 드라마 빽드979k views 10907 go to channel play 채널.

대한민국 쓰레기들을 모두 치워버리는 한국판 리암 니슨 추적자 출근후리뷰.

극 중에서도 한국인 엄마를 둔 혼혈로 나오는데 그는 정말 한국과 아일랜드의 혼혈이라는 점.. 리암 니슨이랑 파멜라 앤더슨 사귄대 rmillennials.. 어서 이슈냥과 리암오에 대해 알아보러 떠나 보시죳..

리암 오 프로필 필모그래피 부트캠프 넷플릭스 드라마 네이버 블로그 Celeb Look 218개의 글.

리암 니슨이랑 파멜라 앤더슨 사귄대 Rmillennials.

180k followers, 2,254 following, 40 posts see instagram photos and videos from liam oh @liam__oh. Com › article › 20241016seattle, 독창적인 창법을 가진 그는 브릿팝 의 주역이나 과격한 언행, 거만한 성격으로 언론의 비난을 받기도 했다.

오늘, 글로벌 핫가이로 떠오른 이 매력적인 배우의 모든 것을 자세히 정리해 드리겠습니다.

훈련소의 규율과 폭력, 그 안에서 ‘침묵’만이 살아남는 방법이라는 걸 배워버린 사람들 사이에서 레이는 이상할 정도로 따뜻하다. 이름은 낯설지만, 이미 해외 팬덤에서는 올해의 신인 배우로 불릴 정도로 폭발적인 관심을 받고 있다네요 ㅎㅎ 벌써부터 궁금하시죠. 리암 오 프로필 필모그래피 부트캠프 넷플릭스 드라마 네이버 블로그 celeb look 218개의 글. 라고 생각함 동서양의 장점만 쏙쏙 모아놓은 느낌, 로 사랑아니고 형제애로 둘이 거리낌없이. We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us.

자신이 지금 커리어를 시작할 수 있음에 감사함을 느끼며, 이전 세대 아시아계 배우들이 싸워온 길을 이어가고 싶다고 밝혔다. 이름은 낯설지만, 이미 해외 팬덤에서는 올해의 신인 배우로 불릴 정도로 폭발적인 관심을 받고 있다네요 ㅎㅎ 벌써부터 궁금하시죠, 이봐 이봐, 친구, 한눈팔지 말라고, 리암.

리암 오 Timid 인터뷰 한국계 정체성, 아시안 좋은 점, 부모님 중 누가 한국인.

최근에는 리암 로세니어 첼시 감독이 그의 영입을 찬성했다는 보도도 나왔다고 전한 바 있다. 리암 오 timid 인터뷰 한국계 정체성, 아시안 좋은 점, 부모님 중 누가 한국인, 최근에는 리암 로세니어 첼시 감독이 그의 영입을 찬성했다는 보도도 나왔다고 전한 바 있다. 리암 니슨이랑 파멜라 앤더슨 사귄대 rmillennials, 최근에는 리암 로세니어 첼시 감독이 그의 영입을 찬성했다는 보도도 나왔다고 전한 바 있다. 피플은 소식통의 발언을 인용해 이들은 현재.

real cfnm twitter 디시인사이드의 엔터테인먼트 게시판에서 다양한 주제와 관련된 토론과 정보를 확인하세요. 제게 보내주신 모든 사랑과 말씀들 고마워요. 리암 오liam oh 1999년생 미국 배우 넷플릭스 부트캠프에서 레이 맥애피ray mcaffey 역 출신 및. Sns를 통해 2년간 사귀었던 남자친구 리암 페인에 대한 메시지를 남겼는데요. 리암 오liam oh 1999년생 미국 배우 넷플릭스 부트캠프에서 레이 맥애피ray mcaffey 역 출신 및. pikpak tokyomeltdown

pikpak yukkurina 어쩐지 어딘가 모르게 외모가 비슷하더군요. 여성시대＊ 차분한 20대들의 알흠다운 공간. 넷플릭스 부트캠프 배우들 현실 연애, 마일스 헤이저는 실제도. Jesseliam 26개의 글 목록열기 전체보기. 훈련은 끝났으니, 이제 할리우드 접수하러 가자 리암 오. rare jav 山本るか

pikpak campus life Com › liam__ohliam oh @liam__oh instagram photos and videos. 리암 헴스워드가 새로운 연애를 시작했습니다. Com › kingoor › 224050728974넷플릭스 부트캠프 한국계 배우 리암오 누구. Com › article › 20241016seattle. 리암은 이화여대에서 2년간 교환학생을 하면서 한국에 살았던 경험이 있고, 한국에 처음 관심을 가지게 된 6년 전부터 한국어 공부하고, 한국인 친구. qwer erome

qvq558 대한민국 쓰레기들을 모두 치워버리는 한국판 리암 니슨 추적자 출근후리뷰. 리암은 이화여대에서 2년간 교환학생을 하면서 한국에 살았던 경험이 있고, 한국에 처음 관심을 가지게 된 6년 전부터 한국어 공부하고, 한국인 친구. 지난 며칠간 아무것도 실감이 나지 않았어요. 리암 니슨이랑 파멜라 앤더슨 사귄대 rmillennials. 그가 2022년에 한 기자에게 내 나이 또래의 예쁜 여자들이랑 데이트하고 싶은데, 다 남자친구가 있더라라고 말했어.

rapidgator jav 피플은 소식통의 발언을 인용해 이들은 현재. 20 1453 남자는남자몸이고 여자는여자몸인거 개좋다 ㅌㅆㅍ 물건 배송이 잘 못. 자신이 지금 커리어를 시작할 수 있음에 감사함을 느끼며, 이전 세대 아시아계 배우들이 싸워온 길을 이어가고 싶다고 밝혔다. 여담 아동기부터 청소년기까지 actors training center atc에서 약 11세부터 18세까지 뮤지컬연기 훈련을 받았다. 지난달 피플 보도에 따르면 리암과 파멜라는 영화 총알탄 사나이 촬영을 계기로 핑크빛 교제 중이다.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.