Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

Record live tv & watch on your own time with youtube tv. 北朝鮮ではハリウッド映画を見ただけで処刑されるパク・ヨンミ氏：これから私が話すことは、自分のために話すのではなく、彼らが言いたいことを世界に伝えるために話します。北朝鮮は想像だにできないことがある国です。tvには1つしかチャンネルがありませ. Record live tv & watch on your own time with youtube tv. 金 主愛1注 1 （キム・ジュエ、 朝 김주애 、 2013年 〈主体 102年〉 ）は、 朝鮮民主主義人民共和国 （北朝鮮）の 最高指導者 金正恩 の娘。2023年には「朝鮮の新星」「女将軍」といった称号が付与されたとされている 2。 なお、北朝鮮は名前を含む一切の個人情報を公表していないため.

수도사 스킬 개조

소올 전남친 바람

金主愛 金 主愛1注 1 （キム・ジュエ、 朝 김주애 、 2013年 〈主体 102年〉 ）は、 朝鮮民主主義人民共和国 （北朝鮮）の 最高指導者 金正恩 の娘。 2023年には「朝鮮の新星」「女将軍」といった称号が付与されたとされている 2。. 北朝鮮については謎が多い。最高指導者の金正恩（キム・ジョンウン）朝鮮労働党委員長の私生活も、その一つだ。 しかし韓国情報機関の情報に, 韓国放送局・mbnは10日、ガールズグループのオーディション番組「under15」の公式snsで「キム・ソル 国民子役俳優のガールズグループ挑戦記」と. Tvnドラマ「応答せよ1988」のジンジュ役で顔を知らせた子役のキム・ソルが、ガールズグループオーディションに挑戦する。 最近、新ガールズグループオーディション番組「under15」の公式snsを通じて、参加者たちのプロフィールが公開された。.

北朝鮮の子供歌手？のキムソルメイちゃんって現在生きているんですか？あと、小指折れてたのって事実ですか？ 韓国で生きてますあと、小指も折れてます.. Org › wiki › パク・ヨンミパク・ヨンミ wikipedia.. 北朝鮮の子どもたちはどのような生活を送っているのだろうか。afp通信の記者が撮影した29枚の写真で、北朝鮮の15年間を振り返ってみよう。read more.. 北朝鮮の子供歌手？のキムソルメイちゃんって現在生きているんですか？ あと、小指折れてたのって事実ですか？ 人気の質問..

Com › steam_shinesky@steam_shinesky instagram photos and videos, Tvnドラマ「応答せよ1988」のジンジュ役で顔を知らせた子役のキム・ソルが、ガールズグループオーディションに挑戦する。最近、新ガールズグループオーディション番組「under15」の公式snsを通じ 韓流・韓国芸能ニュースはkstyle. Now showing｜「梨泰院クラス」キム・ダミ 主演最新作。忽然と姿を消したかつての親友。出会い、想い合い、すれ違った16年。〈2人だけの秘密〉が、絶望を希望に変える感涙の友情物語。, 北朝鮮の女の子が歌を歌っている動画をyoutubeで見ました。 よく見るとその女の子の小指が不自然に曲がっています。曲がってはいけない方向に。それをものともせず精一杯曲を歌っているのですが、何せ顔が笑ってない。その後コメントなどを見ていると「この子が死んだの知ってるから笑え.

섹스타그램

しごとカタログ しごとの先生では、転職・就活、バイト、資格試験などの仕事の. 北朝鮮の金正恩（キム・ジョンウン）朝鮮労働党総書記は8日夜の軍事パレードに李雪主（リ・ソルジュ）夫人と共に第2子の「金ジュエ」氏とみ. たぶん小指折れてる 年末のクソ忙しい時に！ また骨折か. キム・ソルヘ last modified 20250826 013219 category 韓国女性アナウンサー 韓国の女性記者 群山市出身人物 1987年生まれ チャンネルa 群山中央女子高校出身 スクミョン女子大学出身 more. Record live tv & watch on your own time with youtube tv.

소율잉 asmr Com, 自学ネタ monsnode, 郵局定存100萬利息多少, キムソルメイ, 人民幣換港幣報價. Born 30 december 1974 is the daughter of north koreas former leader kim jong il and kim youngsook and a halfsister to kim jong un, the current leader of north korea. 中区域東岸高級中学校早期声楽班の紹介動画。 出身者としてキム・ソルミは「功勲俳優」として紹介されている。 2016年に青峰楽団から牡丹峰楽団に移籍した歌手ユ・ボンミ（유봉미）も出身者として紹介されている。. 取材日2024年8月17日 パクユソン朝鮮学校の実情修学旅行先は北朝鮮 パクユソン 芸人 在日 朝鮮学校 北朝鮮 街録インタビュー 街録ch. Org › wiki › パク・ヨンミパク・ヨンミ wikipedia. 소링이 야동

섹밍 노출 She has been seen recently alongside kim jung uns entourage. Org › wiki › 金主愛金主愛 wikipedia. 北朝鮮の女の子が歌を歌っている動画をyoutubeで見ました。 よく見るとその女の子の小指が不自然に曲がっています。曲がってはいけない方向に。それをものともせず精一杯曲を歌っているのですが、何せ顔が笑ってない。その後コメントなどを見ていると「この子が死んだの知ってるから笑え. 14k followers, 269 following, 596 posts 김솔미 @solmi__kim on instagram 김솔미 solmi kim. Com, 自学ネタ monsnode, 郵局定存100萬利息多少, キムソルメイ, 人民幣換港幣報價. 손밍 fc2

섹트 핑두 北朝鮮の子で一時期小指を折られているだので話題になった。ぽっぽぽっぽ言う歌を歌っていたキム・ソルメイちゃんって脱北したそうですが、キムソルメイと調べると、韓国の衣装を着て。脱北者と｜yahoo. 子役のキム・ソルが近況を伝えた。 キム・ソルの写真共有ソーシャル・ネットワーキング・サービス（sns）「インスタグラム」には11日、「ソウル・ドラマ・アワード2020kキッズ・オープニング公演」という書き込みとともに写真が数枚掲載された。. 北朝鮮の女の子が歌を歌っている動画をyoutubeで見ました。 よく見るとその女の子の小指が不自然に曲がっています。曲がってはいけない方向に。それをものともせず精一杯曲を歌っているのですが、何せ顔が笑ってない。その後コメントなどを見ていると「この子が死んだの知ってるから笑え. 2024年は、kpopファンに愛されたガールズグループの解散が相次いだ。正式に解散を発表したガールズグループがいる一方で、無期限の活動休止でファンに先行きの不安を残したガールズグループもいる。今年は、多くのガールズグループにとってひとつの. Born 30 december 1974 is the daughter of north koreas former leader kim jong il and kim youngsook and a halfsister to kim jong un, the current leader of north korea. 세화 자위

송중기 디시 パクら家族は中国との国境を越えて脱北した。 2007年 3月30日 夜、人身売買屋に手引きされたパクと母親は、極寒の川を渡り、3つの山を越えて中国国境を目指した。一方父親は病を抱え、脱出の足手まといになることを嫌い、一人北朝鮮に残った 310。中国国境を越えた後、パクと母親は 吉林. 子役のキム・ソルが近況を伝えた。 キム・ソルの写真共有ソーシャル・ネットワーキング・サービス（sns）「インスタグラム」には11日、「ソウル・ドラマ・アワード2020kキッズ・オープニング公演」という書き込みとともに写真が数枚掲載された。. Ckm, オバショット, onlyfans421, berlinimtim, ltfinc. Find out if monsnode. 2016年デビュー予定だった エレファントエンターテイメント 所属7人組ガールズグループ トゥインクル のデビュー組.

셩셩라이키 Org › wiki › キム・ソルミキム・ソルミ wikipedia. 北朝鮮の子供歌手？のキムソルメイちゃんって現在生きているんですか？ あと、小指折れてたのって事実ですか？ 人気の質問. 金 雪美1 （キム・ソルミ、 朝鮮語： 김설미）は、 北朝鮮 （朝鮮民主主義人民共和国）の 音楽ユニット である 牡丹峰楽団 のボーカルの1人である。功勲俳優 2。 平壌直轄市 中区域 の東岸（トンアン）中学校（現在、高級中学校）早期声楽班卒業 3 、平壌音楽学院（現在、 金元均名称音楽. 北朝鮮ではハリウッド映画を見ただけで処刑されるパク・ヨンミ氏：これから私が話すことは、自分のために話すのではなく、彼らが言いたいことを世界に伝えるために話します。北朝鮮は想像だにできないことがある国です。tvには1つしかチャンネルがありませ. Jp › content › キムソルミキムソルミとは わかりやすく解説 weblio辞書.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.