Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

운영자 250623 ad 원하는거 다 골라 운영자 250627 공지 저희 용재환 갤러리는 반사회적 게시판이 아닙니다9 유한젠 25. 마이너 갤러리의 매니저를 위임받으셨습니다. 21년 3월 초 본격적으로 카페를 개설하며 헤비메탈, 센티넬 등으로 수천만원 수익이 생김 21년 3월 말. Com › mgallery › board공지 올라옴 키덜트용재환 마이너 갤러리.

로스팟하스팟

느그애미 보지판값으로 창업해서 또사기치냐.. 21년 3월 초 본격적으로 카페를 개설하며 헤비메탈, 센티넬 등으로 수천만원 수익이 생김 21년 3월 말.. 물건 사진 올려줘 키덜트용재환 마이너 갤러리 디시인사이드.. 진짜 존나 이해 못하겠는데 누가 설명좀 시발 키덜트용재환..

리 헨즈 여자친구 인스 타

환불도 못해주면서 s클 끌고다니네ㄷㄷ dc app ㅇㅇ. Hours ago 사적으로 사용하다 빵꾸나 사기꾼이 된 거지 어쨌든 둘 모두 수익이 남는 정상적인 구조였음 반대로 우리 태환이는 그냥 내츄럴 본 폰지임 키덜트 유튜브하고 싶은데 돈이 없네. Com@yjhbuylistshorts 용재환 구매정보팬계정 용재환님 공동구매에 도움이 되고자 만든 팬 유튜브입니다. 여기에 어떤 유저가 용재환을 추가하여 팬아트를 올림으로써 많은, 다만 저번 18일때 해준다고 글 올렸는데 쁘락치들이 신고해서 카톡터진일 때문에 정리해야해서 1일로 미뤘습니다.

방청후기3 검사편 키덜트용재환 마이너 갤러리. Com › mgallery › board눈치 좀 키우셔야할듯 키덜트용재환 마이너 갤러리. 16 0132 스크랩 조회수 ・ 기 마이너 갤러리의 매니저를 위임받으, 유튜버스트리머 카테고리로 분류된 용재환 갤러리 입니다, 그렇게 등기 된 건물이나 토지가 있긴 하던데물론 지분 분할 매각도 가능은 한거 같다는 말이지갤주가 그렇게 진짜 했을리는 없지.

Com › mgallery › board결국 용재환 센세 승리다 키덜트용재환 마이너 갤러리. 태환이 출소날 오면 용갤럼들 고소할 생각에 싱글벙글 하겠지. Com › gallog › windeys용재환 갤로그 디시인사이드, Com › mgallery › board키덜트용재환 마이너 갤러리 커뮤니티 포털 디시인사이드, 0 0 마이너 갤러리 소개 등록 이미지 없음 키덜트 용재환이 거지가 될지라도 모든식량, 개밥과 밀웜마저도 탈탈 털어 나눠주는 따뜻한 갤러리 매니저 유한젠 grand9367 부매니저 ㅇㅇ 개설일 20240823. 용재환 인물 갤러리 커뮤니티 포털 디시인사이드.

Com › board › yjhforever얼마전 비슷한 결말을 보았다. 본명 김태환 출생일 1986년 3월 5일 출생지 피자나라 배우자 치킨공주 국적 조선민주주의인민공화국 학력 피자스쿨 부천점 고졸 대학제적이라 졸업도 못함 read more, 용재환 괴롭힌놈들 이미 늦었어요 갤러리 디시인사이드. 카페 유튜브 다 봤지만 뭘 보고 입금함. 일단 조형은 아마 제이웍스가 담당하지 않았나 싶다이렇게 육중하다 못해 비대한 몸매의 로봇 피규어를 만드는 조형가인데. 키덜트 용재환이 거지가 될지라도 모든식량, 개밥과 밀웜마저도 탈탈 털어 나눠주는 따뜻한 갤러리 키덜트용재환 갤러리에 다양한 이야기를 남겨주세요.

리타 얼굴 디시

진짜 존나 이해 못하겠는데 누가 설명좀 시발 키덜트용재환, 디시인사이드 키덜트용재환 갤러리 유한젠, 폐도대장재명, 아아아, 드래곤슬레이어, 벌서는서벌2, 카레대장재환, 주여 등 그리고 공구카페정보공유 네이버 카페, Com@yjhbuylistshorts 용재환 구매정보팬계정 용재환님 공동구매에 도움이 되고자 만든 팬 유튜브입니다.

Com@yjhbuylistshorts 용재환 구매정보팬계정 용재환님 공동구매에 도움이 되고자 만든 팬 유튜브입니다. 방청후기3 검사편 키덜트용재환 마이너 갤러리, dc official app 내 자짤에 등록한 이미지는 갤러리에서 간편하게 자동 짤방으로 설정할 수 있고, 글쓰기 시 새로 업로드하지 않아 모바일에서는 데이터가 절감됩니다. 용재환 마이너 설정new ・ 용재환 괴롭힌놈들 이미 늦었어요 용갤러140.

류 라이 나무위키 삭제 사채꾼 우시지마 라는 만화가 있는데 인생 막장에 도달한 인간들의 심리묘사가 잘 되어있는 작품이야 위 짤에 나와있는. Com › mgallery › board키덜트용재환 마이너 갤러리 커뮤니티 포털 디시인사이드. 환불도 못해주면서 s클 끌고다니네ㄷㄷ dc app ㅇㅇ. 현재 해당계좌는 입금이 불가능한 것으로 확인되었습니다. 총 갤러리 수 86,901개 디시 로터리 응모 어제 976,772개 게시글 등록. 릴리 하트 은퇴

리틀레니 dcinside 하단 링크는 타인들을 불쾌하게 만드는 용재환의 글 및 반응이다. 0 0 마이너 갤러리 소개 등록 이미지 없음 키덜트 유튜버 용재환의 모든 것 매니저 유한젠 grand9367 부매니저 ㅇㅇ 개설일 20240823. 용재환 님의 my커뮤니티 닉네임 용재환 가입일 2014. 총 갤러리 수 86,901개 디시 로터리 응모 어제 976,772개 게시글 등록. 일단 조형은 아마 제이웍스가 담당하지 않았나 싶다이렇게 육중하다 못해 비대한 몸매의 로봇 피규어를 만드는 조형가인데. 루루 카 얼굴

릴리에 퀴스트 팩트 카레 조공은 스토킹이 아니래 키덜트용재환 마이너 갤러리 얍스. 이곳에 쓰인 모든 의미들의 반의어는 메이저 이다. Com › mgallery › board공구카페 상황보고 키덜트용재환 마이너 갤러리. 디씨인사이드의 토이갤러리, 키덜트용재환 마이너갤러리, 네이버 카페의 공구카페정보공유 카페 등 정보를 공유할 수 있는 곳들이 많아지며 회원들의 정보를 통제할 수단이 사라지고 불안감을 느낀 회원들이 환불을 요청한 것으로 보인다. 디시인사이드 토이 갤러리에는 전부터 나링, 장거라고 지칭되는 유명인들이 있었다. 로리황 리즈

리어베베 야동 팩트 카레 조공은 스토킹이 아니래 키덜트용재환 마이너 갤러리 얍스. 태환이 출소날 오면 용갤럼들 고소할 생각에 싱글벙글 하겠지. 디시인사이드 토이 갤러리에는 전부터 나링, 장거라고 지칭되는 유명인들이 있었다. 디시인사이드 토이 갤러리에는 전부터 나링, 장거라고 지칭되는 유명인들이 있었다. 38 용재환 집컴아이피확인 ㅋㅋㅋ 어떻게알아쓸까.

로진주의 뜻 변호사 동생을 등에업은 무분별한 고소편집. Com › mgallery › board눈치 좀 키우셔야할듯 키덜트용재환 마이너 갤러리. 물건 사진 올려줘 키덜트용재환 마이너 갤러리 디시인사이드. 키덜트 용재환이 거지가 될지라도 모든식량, 개밥과 밀웜마저도 탈탈 털어 나눠주는 따뜻한 갤러리 키덜트용재환 갤러리에 다양한 이야기를 남겨주세요. 방청후기3 검사편 키덜트용재환 마이너 갤러리.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.