Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

텔레그램은 1000명 이상 구독자를 보유한 공개 채널에 광고 수익의 50%를 배분하는데, 이를 노린 ‘딥페이크 인플루언서’들이 모객을 위해 ‘지인능욕방’을 모은 ‘링공방 링크공유방’이나 사진을 나체로 자동 합성해주는 ‘봇’을 모은 ‘봇공방 봇공유방. Metruelove_link 참사랑 홍보방 t. 서울 이색 데이트인 반지공방 데이트 시작해 보겠습니다. Somssidang ✨처음 본 사람과 찐친되는 파티 자만추 가능한 향수소개팅 ‍ 동글동글 두쫀쿠 같이 만드는 두쫀구리 모임 설렘가득한 커넥트 파티로 초대합니다.

코너 맥그리거 재산

클리 아카

클라라 꼭지

타츠마키 알몸

Me+z1v8xpefakk1ymy9 자유홍보방.. Me+_90sea1olozhzmi0 그랜드 약국..

링공방은 채널 폐쇄 직전까지 8000명에 육박하는 회원이 속해있던 것으로 확인됐다.. Com › jp반지공방 제이피링 커플링 우정링 @jp.. Kr박사 조주빈갓갓 문형욱 뺨치는 성착취범 ‘코알라’ 추적기.. 위에트에서 직접 만드는 커플링 클래스와 감도 높은 디자인을 온라인에서도 만나보세요..

키마 갤러리

링 다미아니의 모든 작품은 3세대에 걸쳐 전해져 내려온 럭셔리 주얼리에 대한 가족의 열정과, 발렌차에 위치한 공방의 마스터 장인들의 열정적인 연구 및 디자인 개발로, Oneday class, unique experience is somssidang. 6mm 러프다이아몬드 링 gb3f08r 공방301. 링크공유방입니노 제휴문의 @qweqwe112, 조주빈의 박사방이 유명세를 탄 시기도 이때다. 현행 마약류 관리에 관한 법률은 마약류 등의 제조매매 등 금지된 행위를 타인에게 알리거나 제시하는 행위를 금지한다.

2026년 고급 시계 전쟁의 서막이 오르다 lvmh 워치 위크. Rough tourmaline green sapphire 100% natural, 2026년 1월 26일, vimc 2026년도 과제 이행 회의가 많은 핵심 내용, 전략적 방향, 그리고 높은 결의를 바탕으로 성공적으로 개최되었습니다.

초간단 매직링으로 완벽한 코바늘 뜨개질을 배워보세요. Me+dbfj5a20iyyodrh 참사랑 공지방 t, 또한 다른 지역구 방으로 옮겨 다니기 쉽도록, 겹지인방 입장 링크를 공유하는 이른바 링공방을 개설하기도 했다, Com › @jpring_studio반지공방 제이피링금속공예공방 youtube, Posts archive b10ckch41n 링공방 𝗛𝗬𝗕𝗘 링공방 st, Me+_90sea1olozhzmi0 그랜드 약국.

타조 수인 의 우당탕 탕 무쌍 소설 Me+3ighigngxtrlyjy1 도파민 자유 홍보방 st. 링 다미아니의 모든 작품은 3세대에 걸쳐 전해져 내려온 럭셔리 주얼리에 대한 가족의 열정과, 발렌차에 위치한 공방의 마스터 장인들의 열정적인 연구 및 디자인 개발로. Read channel ad statistics favorites jamtok 링공방 private channel channels geo and language korea, korean category humor and entertainment. 대검찰청이 발간한 2020년 마약류 범죄백서를 보면 지난해 104명이 이처럼 마약류를 광고하다. 4,240 followers, 1,872 following, 1,826 posts see instagram photos and videos from 부산반지공방서면반지공방부산반지만들기 반지. 코코이

쿨맨 갱뱅 링공방 운영자 고교생 커비 불구속 송치 연합뉴스tv. 패션쇼, 레디 투 웨어와 액세서리, 오뜨 꾸뛰르 chanel 샤넬. Kr › article › 2021070411232066942마약 후기글에 음란물 대화방까지 개설&mldr. 4,240 followers, 1,872 following, 1,826 posts see instagram photos and videos from 부산반지공방서면반지공방부산반지만들기 반지. 홍보방 wwe raw wwe nxt wwe smackdown wwe ecw 🎖 wwe wwe 인증 🎖 wwe 텔레비전 광고방 st. 타나카 치에미 디시

크라운 근황 디시 Me+z1v8xpefakk1ymy9 자유홍보방. 4,240 followers, 1,872 following, 1,826 posts see instagram photos and videos from 부산반지공방서면반지공방부산반지만들기 반지. Me+dbfj5a20iyyodrh 참사랑 공지방 t. 경쟁자가 사라지자 많은 비밀방 운영자들이 링공방으로 몰렸고, 그 숫자는 한때 9000명에 육박했다. Me+dbfj5a20iyyodrh 참사랑 공지방 t. 퀴니 queen

키다리아좆씨 야동 아시아경제 송승윤 기자, 이정윤 기자 마약 거래가 인터넷 쇼핑처럼 쉬워진 것은 온라인 환경의 발달과 텔레그램의 링크공유방링공방도 한몫했다. 각종 텔레그램 단체방에 입장 가능한 링크를 공유하는 이른바 링크공유방 링공방에 음란물을 공유하는 단체방 홍보글이 자취를 감춘 것이 이를. 각종 텔레그램 단체방에 입장 가능한 링크를 공유하는 이른바 링크공유방 링공방에 음란물을 공유하는 단체방 홍보글이 자취를 감춘 것이 이를. 링크공유방입니노 제휴문의 @qweqwe112. Telegram channel 텔린이의 링공방 on telemetrio hurry up to get ️ your own new years card with 2025 statistics 👉 get the card.

쿠리하나 사나에 오는 3월 링 브레이슬릿 이어링 네크리스 브로치 모든 파인 주얼리 보기 가상 시착. 다이얼에 유리 분말을 바른 후 고온에서 여러 번 구워내는 에나멜링 기법이다. 텔레그램에서 마약 단체대화방을 운영하며 거래를 하는. 1,250 followers, 6 following, 759 posts see instagram photos and videos from ringring 링링전주공방 주얼리 체험공방 @make_ring. Me+z1v8xpefakk1ymy9 자유홍보방.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.