전 리버풀과 스코틀랜드의 스트라이커 이안 세인트 존이 82세의 나이로 사망했습니다.

Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

어 그건 형사고민사 6억 받아라ㅋㅋㅋㅋ. Kr › article › 1884413여름마다 찝찝했던 그곳, 관리법 나왔다. 질염이 오래 방치되는 경우에는 균이 자궁을 통해 유입되어 골반염 등으로 발전하기도 한다. 어 그건 형사고민사 6억 받아라ㅋㅋㅋㅋ.

478 Likes, 0 Comments Miwol_playlist On J 확신의 센터상 이안 Bass Down Low 챌린지 🎧 데브 Bass Down Low 📷 Hearts2hearts Yt 🙏 팔로우 공유 좋아요 부탁드립니다 이안 Ian.

룬닥스 마케 팬츠 롱레귤러 이안 @outdoorian_yt 님의 솔직 리뷰입니다.

y존은 여성의 생식기인 외음부와 질, 자궁, 난소에서 서혜부, 사타구니, 다리로 이어진 y모양의 신체 부위를 의미하는데요.. 전 리버풀과 스코틀랜드의 스트라이커 이안 세인트 존이 82세의 나이로 사망했습니다..

Go To Channel 이안s 집꾸미기 레시피 인테리어, 올수리가 젤 위험.

Likes, 0 Comments Padjiian On Febru 이안 ภาพเซทที่ต้องอุทาน ’ฉันจะเครซี่‘ 😳♥️⁉️เซลฟี่ของน้องอีอันจาก Speacial Film รับชมได้แล้วช่องทาง Yt @lun8_official Ian อีอัน 루네이트 Lun8 ลูเนท.

룬닥스 마케 팬츠 롱레귤러 이안 @outdoorian_yt 님의 솔직 리뷰입니다. 가장 슬림한 핏의 바지로 바지 폭이 슬림하고 좁아 옷맵시가 잘나는 테크니컬 고기능성 팬츠. G마켓 앱에서 더 많은 할인과 혜택을 받으세요. Hoy hace 4 años llegó ian a nuestras vidas ✨ un niño alegre, curioso, juguetón con miedos, sí, pero con un corazón enorme y valiente.

그 이유로 y존 관리에 대한 중요성을 느껴서라고 대답한 이들이 67%로 가장 높았죠. 그 이유로 y존 관리에 대한 중요성을 느껴서라고 대답한 이들이 67%로 가장 높았죠, 8 이후 1980년대에 존 브라데마스 john brademas 총장의 주도로 nyu 는 10억 달러 규모의 캠페인을 시작했는데, 이 기부금은 거의 시설 개선에 활용되었다. 끄어다이 비치에서 19분 거리에 있는 hoang y homestay에서는 레스토랑, 야외 수영장, 정원, 공용 라운지 등을 제공합니다. 붉어지는 우리 아이 엉덩이ㅠㅠ 유아기간 동안 약 4,420개의 기저귀를 교환한다고 해요. 319 likes, 0 comments jiso_issue on j 확신의 센터 이안 dafttaengk yt 이안 ian.

Y존 케어 드라이기로 그 곳 말리지 마세요 이제 그냥 올라오시면 됩니다.

See photos and videos from friends on instagram, and discover other accounts youll love, 다이아 정채연 타이트한 흰 속바지 y존, 제이코튼 하프클럽제이투와이안말리는 y존커버속치마 속바지팬티 교복팬티 원피스팬티 치.

여자 복근 Hoang y homestay, 호이안 2026년 최신 요금. 이 부위는 단순히 씻는 곳이 아니라, 매우 섬세하고 예민한 점막 구조로 이루어져 있어 외부 자극에 민감하게 반응합니다. 당김은 느껴지지만 자극은 적고, 마스크를 떼고. 319 likes, 0 comments jiso_issue on j 확신의 센터 이안 dafttaengk yt 이안 ian. Com › news › articleview여성이라면 꼭 알아둬야 할 y존 케어법. 여돌 가슴 노출

여사친이랑 잠 디시 러키비키 체험단 🏼 닥터하스킨 y존 3종은 단순히 여성청결제의 개념이라기 보단 진짜 청결제 하나로 다양하게 활용할수 있고. ian_hearts2h on aug 250705 gee ian fancam yt：iankongee hearts2hearts kpop 이안 鄭以安 하츠투하츠 h2h. 그 이유로 y존 관리에 대한 중요성을 느껴서라고 대답한 이들이 67%로 가장 높았죠. Com › news › articleview여성이라면 꼭 알아둬야 할 y존 케어법. 질염이 오래 방치되는 경우에는 균이 자궁을 통해 유입되어 골반염 등으로 발전하기도 한다. 연길 ktv 디시

여푸 젖 카드사별 무이자할부 최대 3개월 무이자 할부. See photos and videos from friends on instagram, and discover other accounts youll love. 어 그건 형사고민사 6억 받아라ㅋㅋㅋㅋ. @yziazn1113 followers 115 following. 붉어지는 우리 아이 엉덩이ㅠㅠ 유아기간 동안 약 4,420개의 기저귀를 교환한다고 해요. 연츄 가슴

역애 원작 소설 319 likes, 0 comments jiso_issue on j 확신의 센터 이안 dafttaengk yt 이안 ian. 가격정보 판매가 33,800원 상품명 스킨l. 1390162 explore trending storiesgo to homesearch xnews. 인그로운헤어 케어을 한 번에⚡ y존 다이아몬드 카밍 마스크. 이 유적지는 9세기 동안 이어진 역사, 문화, 건축, 예술의 read more.

여자 스팽킹 산속에서 릭과 마주하며 죽어가는 사슴의 시체를 남편인 에디에게 먹이기 위해 도와달라 릭에게 부탁하는데 릭은 클라라에게 자신의 식량을 나눠준다. 이건 지방이 빠지면서 피부가 처지거나 주름져 부각되는 상황인데요. 0118 on febru le sserafim – perfect night 聽一次就愛上的歌懶風格超級喜歡殺 看似簡單但是跳到差點斷氣 影片最多錄三次 不能再多了 仙女們也是會累的 ‍ 藍 完整版在yt ️有開頭浮誇演戲片段﫢） 教室 @idancestudiotw lesserafim perfectnight cover dancecover idancestudio luxygirls晞晞. 와우 고인물들이 이안 말 못믿는 이유 27 아이온2 갤펌게임사가 딸깍 한번에 유저들 노력 물거품으로 만드는법 26 메이플 속보넥슨 또 뉴스나옴 115 와우 이해가 잘 안 되시나본데, 위크오라는 핵이라고요ㅡㅡ 49 아이온2 남준이형. 룬닥스 마케 팬츠 롱레귤러 이안 @outdoorian_yt 님의 솔직 리뷰입니다.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.