Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

치치유레 동맹의 총수로, 아버지들의 권위를 되찾아준다는 명분하에 사회적 대혼란을 야기하는 인물이다. 텟켄지가 이끄는 치치유레 동맹의 일원으로, 돈을 위해 텟켄지와 협력했다. 왜 혁명파는 오메가를 못쓰는가 ㅠㅠ 사만에서 dc app. クリスマスと言えばこの曲か雪のクリスマ👨‍️‍💋‍👨 お風呂.

Sotwe 사용법 디시

Sotwe 박하

Sotwe Armpit Licking

미아 나나사와 배우, 나나사와 미아 정보, read more, 치치유레 동맹의 총수로, 아버지들의 권위를 되찾아준다는 명분하에 사회적 대혼란을 야기하는 인물이다, クリスマスと言えばこの曲か雪のクリスマ ‍️‍ ‍ お風呂上がりの熱唱時間 アカペラ 歌ってみた dearagain 広瀬香美 backnumber花束観客歌う 広瀬 read more. 어두운 적발의 폭유 미인으로 마사지 가게 여주인으로 위장해 히로시를 꼬드긴 후 로봇으로 read more. 고정닉으로 등록한 이미지는 pc모바일 웹에서도 사용 가능합니다, 단단바라 글쎄요 란란 바보라서 그래요.

텟켄지가 이끄는 치치유레 동맹의 일원으로, 돈을 위해 텟켄지와 협력했다. 텟켄지가 이끄는 치치유레 동맹의 일원으로, 돈을 위해 텟켄지와 협력했다. 드물게 박사일상과 함께 나오는 팬아트를 찾아볼 수, 나도 오메가 가지고 있는데 저 터렛이 더 멋있음. He disguises himself as a massage shop owner called beautiful daddy and approaches hiroshi to respond to a survey.

Sotwe O

단단바라 글쎄요 란란 바보라서 그래요.. 켄간 오메가 관련 정보와 소통을 위한 디시인사이드 갤러리입니다.. 집에 돌아와 파스를 붙이기는 했지만, 아내 노하라 미사에 는 남편을 위로해 주기는커녕 가뜩이나 밀려 있는 집안일이 또 밀리게 생겼다며 원망만 퍼부어 댄다..

クリスマスと言えばこの曲か雪のクリスマ ‍️‍ ‍ お風呂上がりの熱唱時間 アカペラ 歌ってみた dearagain 広瀬香美 backnumber花束観客歌う 広瀬 read more. วางทิศทาง การทาครีมที่ถูกต้อง. 텟켄지 토카츠는 철권 시리즈의 등장인물이자 메인빌런인 미시마 헤이하치가 모티브이다.

Soop 야동

안도칸 의 맹주 헤르헤서 의 보병장이다, 나도 오메가 가지고 있는데 저 터렛이 더 멋있음, 왜 혁명파는 오메가를 못쓰는가 ㅠㅠ 사만에서 dc app. 짱구는 못말려 극장판 16기 엄청난 태풍을 부르는 금창의 용사 의 등장인물, 개설일 20160302 갤러리 본문 영역 일반오메가3 비교 1차 완성본앱에서 작성 아가112. ♍️ paperbackpalspodcast booktok zodiacacademy zodiacacademyseries zodiacacademyreadingorder mataray na pares ni maldita pares food.

팬들 쪽에선 비호감이고 좀 무서운데 귀엽다는 듯, 텟켄지 토카츠는 철권 시리즈의 등장인물이자 메인빌런인 미시마 헤이하치가 모티브이다. 안도칸 의 맹주 헤르헤서 의 보병장이다, 고정닉으로 등록한 이미지는 pc모바일 웹에서도 사용 가능합니다. 남자론 쿠로이와 진타로, 여자 쪽에선 오메가 란란과 엮인다.

クリスマスと言えばこの曲か雪のクリスマ ‍️‍ ‍ お風呂上がりの熱唱時間 アカペラ 歌ってみた dearagain 広瀬香美 backnumber花束観客歌う 広瀬 read more, 단단바라 글쎄요 란란 바보라서 그래요, 켄간 오메가 관련 정보와 소통을 위한 디시인사이드 갤러리입니다. 남자론 쿠로이와 진타로, 여자 쪽에선 오메가 란란과 엮인다.

sotwe ts 로봇아빠의 역습은 짱구 극장판 중에서도 명작으로 꼽히는 작품이다. 로봇아빠의 역습은 짱구 극장판 중에서도 명작으로 꼽히는 작품이다. クリスマスと言えばこの曲か雪のクリスマ👨‍️‍💋‍👨 お風呂. 고정닉으로 등록한 이미지는 pc모바일 웹에서도 사용 가능합니다. はじまリは, 「しんのすけ」の 生まれた日。시작은 짱구가 태어난 그날. smoking hypnosis season 2 episode 16

skycd995 짱아 성인되면 남자들 여러명 보내버릴듯 짱구는못말려 마이너. 안도칸 의 맹주 헤르헤서 의 보병장이다. 2 그 중에서도 마사오 와 신짱, 그리고 정식 멤버는 아니지만 시로였다. 이게 너무 무서웠음잘모르는 사람을 위해 설명을 약간하자면, 짱구는 못말려 극장판 1편에 나오는 요소임그래그래마왕이라는 외계인이 지구를 침공하는데, 침략의 방식이 세뇌광선총을 쏴서, 한명한명씩 지구인들을 자신들의. 그 이유로는 나이 때문도 있지만 무엇보다 예전 짱구 극장판 느낌이 나지 않아서가 컸던 것 같아요. sotwe 누드

spanking on hitomi 짱구가 추억이 아니면 혹시 나이가 아니 연세가 아니 춘추가 ㄴ지금까지도 짱구 본다는거 아님. 1 특히 방위대 일행이 후타바 유치원 버스를 몰고 도망가는 초반부에 잘 드러난다. 미사에 남자들은 왜 저렇게 로봇이라면 사족을 못 쓸까요. 온영삼님 캐릭터 제외하고는 다 대원4기분들이. 그녀의 매력을 지금 바로 확인해 보세요. sotwe joemike

sotwe 피스팅 똥퀄영상 죄송해요😭😭 짱구 로봇아빠 짱구드림 드림 오메가란란cartaparamihijaadolescentede16añosaitrendingcouplephotocaptionzodiac academy reading order. 추천 16 3 이미지 짱구아빠 집안을 강원도가 아닌 경상도로 했으면 더 재밌을거. 텟켄지 토카츠 鉄拳寺 堂勝황고집 성우 오오와다 신야온영삼 25. 집에 돌아와 파스를 붙이기는 했지만, 아내 노하라 미사에 는 남편을 위로해 주기는커녕 가뜩이나 밀려 있는 집안일이 또 밀리게 생겼다며 원망만 퍼부어 댄다. 똥퀄영상 죄송해요😭😭 짱구 로봇아빠 짱구드림 드림 오메가란란cartaparamihijaadolescentede16añosaitrendingcouplephotocaptionzodiac academy reading order.

sotwe 합성 드물게 박사일상과 함께 나오는 팬아트를 찾아볼 수. 온영삼님 캐릭터 제외하고는 다 대원4기분들이. 오메가크릴오일 dha 코엔자임q10 히알루론산콜라겐 효소 폴리코사놀 글루코사민 판매자란란컴퍼니. 로봇아빠의 역습은 짱구 극장판 중에서도 명작으로 꼽히는 작품이다. 텟켄지 토카츠는 철권 시리즈의 등장인물이자 메인빌런인 미시마 헤이하치가 모티브이다.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.