Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

니시노미야에 자리한 lucky sun에서는 무료 wifi, 무료 전용 주차장 등을 이용하실 수 있습니다. 아이묭 투어 대성공을 바라는 것 같았습니다. 마사지와 핫스톤은 추가 요금을 내야 합니다. 첫경험은 고1 때 여자랑 레즈 플레이로 시작했다.

Kuzu Go

히가시신사이바시 나이트클럽이나 활기찬 분위기를 찾는 분들에게 최적.. 한신・아마가사키・아와지의한국인 가능 풍속유흥.. 이 지역은 산, 해안선, 온천 등 숨막히는 자연 경관을 자랑합니다..

Koreansfw

Kriim Pikpak

한신・아마가사키・아와지의한국인 가능 풍속유흥. 한신 타이거즈 선수들과 기념촬영, 360° 영상으로 야구장을 즐기는 등 다양한 ar 콘텐츠를 즐길 수 있습니다. 고객이 안심하고 이용하실 수 있도록 친절하고 건전하고 안전한 영업을 위해 노력하고 있습니다, 저 일하는 곳이 니시노미야 키타구치역 근처인데, 오사카에 살고 싶어. 감각적인 마사지는 물론 에로틱한 자위 서비스, 키스 서비스도 열정과 관능을 선사합니다, Jankara hankyu nishinomiya.

니시노미야에 자리한 lucky sun에서는 무료 wifi, 무료 전용 주차장 등을 이용하실 수 있습니다, 구루메의 관광명소 구루메 관광 가이드. 미노 산맥의 최서단, 표고 312미터의 고라산에 자리잡은 것이 옛 고쿠헤이타이샤이며 지쿠고국 이치노미야인 고라타이샤입니다, 히가시신사이바시 나이트클럽이나 활기찬 분위기를 찾는 분들에게 최적.

Latulip_0 Leaked

Co › star › 니시미야유메니시미야 유메 yume nishimiya 품번 hentaku. 미노 산맥의 최서단, 표고 312미터의 고라산에 자리잡은 것이 옛 고쿠헤이타이샤이며 지쿠고국 이치노미야인 고라타이샤입니다, 니시노미야 가든은 백화점과 전문점, 슈퍼마켓, 패션 잡화, 극장과 음식점이 모두 모인 최대급 쇼핑몰 입니다. 점심은 따로 주문했는데 정말 맛있었습니다.

Liverpool sound club 2, 히가시신사이바시 나이트클럽이나 활기찬 분위기를 찾는 분들에게 최적. 서쪽 끝이라고 볼수있는 니시7에는 호로몬이나 야키니쿠같은 고기구이 전문점이.

Jankara hanshin nishinomiya 3. 하얀 피부를 맞대며 아이돌급 미소를 날리는 게 호감 200% 상승 필살기. Com › menu › actor니시미야 유메 미소가 예쁜 아이돌급 av배우 avdbs. 니시노미야 자유여행 가이드 2026년 인기 명소, 맛집 트립닷컴.

추천 메뉴는 신선도를 살린 회와 구마모토현 직송의, 2015년까지 오승환 이 한신 타이거즈에서 뛰었다. 점심은 따로 주문했는데 정말 맛있었습니다. 하얀 피부를 맞대며 아이돌급 미소를 날리는 게 호감 200% 상승 필살기, 헨타이씨 데려왔어 ㅋㅋ 이것이 니시미야 유메의 에로 테크닉. 이 고라다마타레구의 창건은 리추천황 원년.

일본 최고의 환대 풍속을 넘어선 최고의 서비스 이것이 저희 가게의 모토입니다, 니시노미야 나이트라이프 best 10 tripadvisor. 티켓에는 마사지와 핫스톤이 포함되어 있지 않습니다, 니시미야 유메, 최근 품번ipzz728 2026년 01월 13일 출시 대표장르질내사o, 페라, 미소녀, 색녀, vr전용, 키스입술, 음어, 술집풍속녀 총 작품수211. 서쪽 끝이라고 볼수있는 니시7에는 호로몬이나 야키니쿠같은 고기구이 전문점이.

Liverpool sound club 2. 감각적인 마사지는 물론 에로틱한 자위 서비스, 키스 서비스도 열정과 관능을 선사합니다, 모자 익명 0505 먹고싶다 ㅅㅂ년 익명 0425 bj황핫바느낌남 익명 1128 나시미야 유메 익명 1002 가슴은 작은 편이지만 쳐지지 않아서 좋음 ㅋ 연기도 괜찮 익명 0910 리즈시절 떡반응 좋았는데 지금은 프로창녀됨 익명 0804 얘는 댓글이조용하구나 이쁜디 익명 0707 이런여자 품고자고시프당 익명 0706.

Co › star › 니시미야유메니시미야 유메 yume nishimiya 품번 hentaku, 점심은 따로 주문했는데 정말 맛있었습니다. 자연 경관 자연 애호가라면 효고현에서 탐험할 곳이 많습니다, Jankara hankyu nishinomiya.

korean stripchat 두번째는 2022 고시엔 구장에 있었던. 한신 고시엔 구장의 ar 콘텐츠를 태블릿으로 즐길 수 있습니다. 한신 고시엔 구장의 ar 콘텐츠를 태블릿으로 즐길 수 있습니다. 누구와든 친해질 수 있는 친화력이 특기라고 한다. 고객이 안심하고 이용하실 수 있도록 친절하고 건전하고 안전한 영업을 위해 노력하고 있습니다. korean gaysex

kuzu 203 Liverpool sound club 2. Com › narcoking › 223116050491다양한 볼거리, 숨겨진 명소가 있는 일본 효고현 여행지 베스트 리스. Jankara hanshin nishinomiya 3. 니시노미야 자유여행 가이드 2026년 인기 명소, 맛집 트립닷컴. 상대방에게 적극적으로 달려다는 그녀의 작품의 세계로 초대합니다. kuzu 여자들

kuzu 3p 한신・아마가사키・아와지의한국인 가능 풍속유흥. 히가시신사이바시 나이트클럽이나 활기찬 분위기를 찾는 분들에게 최적. 7박 8일 일본여행 ⑤ 아이묭 성지순례니시노미야 신사, 헨젤. Yoasobi heaven는 일본에서 가장 유명한 풍속 정보 사이트 중 하나인 시티 헤븐 넷에서 운영하고 있습니다. 생애 데뷔 전 1995년 3월 6일 효고현 아마가사키시 에서 태어나 소학교 2학년. korean dick lpsg

ks 중고차 수출 디시 이 고라다마타레구의 창건은 리추천황 원년. 이 고라다마타레구의 창건은 리추천황 원년. 이는 니시노미야 시 말고도, 오사카와 코베 사이에 껴있는 도시들 4 의 특징이기도 하다. 감각적인 마사지는 물론 에로틱한 자위 서비스, 키스 서비스도 열정과 관능을 선사합니다. 니시노미야 나이트라이프 best 10 tripadvisor.

kuzu_v0 토렌트 고객이 안심하고 이용하실 수 있도록 친절하고 건전하고 안전한 영업을 위해 노력하고 있습니다. 니시노미야역 1분신선한 회, 말고기 사시미, 구운 모츠나베. 숙소는 한신 고시엔 구장에서 18분 거리에 있습니다. 평범한 섹시미로는 부족합니다 저희 매장은 더욱 성, 향기, 성욕을 추구하며, read more. 서일본 최대의 쇼핑몰 ‘니시노미야 가든’을 여러분께 적극 추천해 드립니다.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.