Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

오랜만에 일본 애니메이션, 게임에 다시 푹 빠지게 되어 제가 구매하고자 한 건 이것. 예전에 썻던 누런박스, 오덕닷컴 궁금해서 찾아보니까 지금도 대행수수료 무료는 유지중인데 입찰보증금 관련해서 개창렬됨. 회원가입시 배송비쿠폰 6000원이랑 사이버머니 3000원을 줘서ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ. 우선 메루카리에서 마음에 드는 물품을 고른다.

주의 깨지기 쉬운 상품 유리, 레진완성품, 도자기류은 보상이 불가합니다.. 일반 백붕이의 메루카리 첫경험 후기+ 오덕닷컴 갤러리.. 오덕닷컴에서 사이버머니 충전해서 현금결제 하면 수수료 없음..

히토미 오피스룩

Com › board › list오덕닷컴 일본구매대행, 일본경매대행, 일본배송대행. 현지 구매와 입고 후 배송비 측정이 빨라 앞으로도 자주 이용할 예정이다, 배송수단별 국제배송 요금표 오덕특송발송을 희망시에는 카카오톡으로 접수 부탁드리겠습니다, Com › mgallery › board백붕이의 메루카리 첫경험 후기 + 오덕닷컴 대세는 백합 마이너.

신규 회원에게 3000원 할인쿠폰+6000원 배송비 할인 쿠폰을 준다, Com › fncpdk1004 › 222282260496메루카리 구매대행업체 오덕닷컴 이용법 앙스타 파샤코레 구매 후기. 오덕닷컴에서 사이버머니 충전해서 현금결제 하면 수수료 없음. 개인통관고유부호 관세청에서 발급받을 수 있으니 찾아보도록 하자.

첫 구매자들은 9000원을 할인받을 수 있다는 거, 예전에 썻던 누런박스, 오덕닷컴 궁금해서 찾아보니까 지금도 대행수수료 무료는 유지중인데 입찰보증금 관련해서 개창렬됨, 대신 당분간 메루카리 코멘트접수 안받는다그랬고, 일처리 관련해서 기복이 존나심함. 오덕이 자체환율도 그렇고 정기쿠폰도 있어서 비용만큼은 존나싸. 마비노기 모바일 마이너 갤러리 r76 판, 5560001 大阪府 大阪市浪速区 下寺 3－6－7 2階 a 오덕닷컴 배송대행 주문번호 예 a 412345 받는사람 회원님 영문이름 tel 0666496610 배송대행 주문번호는 마이페이지에서 확인 가능하십니다.

히토미 포켓몬 디시

배송수단별 국제배송 요금표 오덕특송발송을 희망시에는 카카오톡으로 접수 부탁드리겠습니다.. 재팬타임몰 항상 물건을 받으면 포장박스도 흠집이 거의없이 깔끔하게 와서 너무 좋습니다.. 최근 방문 메루카리 같은 경우는 보통 판매자가 부담하니까 그냥..

여러모로 괜찮은 듯해서 오덕닷컴을 통해 메루카리 구매대행을 진행하였다. Followers, 37 following, 15 posts 오덕닷컴 @5duck on instagram 안녕하세요 오덕닷컴 입니다. 오덕닷컴은 회원과 재화등의 공급시기에 관하여 별도의 약정이 없는 한, 재화등이 오덕닷컴의 일본 사무소에 도착한 날부터 7일 이내에 재화 등을 배송할 수 있도록 포장 등 기타의 필요한 조치를 취합니다. 일본 메루카리 구매대행 i 배대지 오덕닷컴 이용 방법, 후기 네이버 블로그 toy 16개의 글 목록열기.

누런박스는 입찰보증금 3만원당 최대 입찰한도 7000엔 오덕닷컴은 아예 입찰금액의 절반을 입찰. Com › mgallery › board오덕닷컴 써보신분 질문 좀 게임보이 마이너 갤러리. 일반 백붕이의 메루카리 첫경험 후기+ 오덕닷컴 갤러리.

히토미 사지절단

재팬타임몰 항상 물건을 받으면 포장박스도 흠집이 거의없이 깔끔하게 와서 너무 좋습니다. 여러모로 괜찮은 듯해서 오덕닷컴을 통해 메루카리 구매대행을 진행하였다. 걔네도 서비스직이다보니 스트레스가 이만저만이 아닐 것이다. 배송대행 주문번호는 신청서 작성 후에만 발급됩니다, 현지 구매와 입고 후 배송비 측정이 빨라 앞으로도 자주 이용할 예정이다. 보드게임 갤러리 설정 연관 갤러리 133 갤주소 복사 이용안내 오덕닷컴 여기도 배송대행 괜칞아보이네 ㅇㅇ211.

주의 깨지기 쉬운 상품 유리, 레진완성품, 도자기류은 보상이 불가합니다. 154건의 거래를 하는동안 생긴 사소한 지식을 공유함으로써 오덕닷컴을 어떻게 사용하면 좋은지 알려주겠다. 오덕닷컴은 일본내 온라인 상품의 옥션구매를 중계, 대행하는 서비스를 제공하는 업체로 재고를 보유하지 않으며, 상품의 이미지 및 등록내용에 관해서 일체의 책임을 지지 않습니다, 이들은 신규가입혜택, 배송대행수수료, 국제 운송료를 모두 고려했을때 비용이 read more. 오덕닷컴은 일본내 온라인 상품의 옥션구매를 중계, 대행하는 서비스를 제공하는 업체로 재고를 보유하지 않으며, 상품의 이미지 및 등록내용에 관해서 일체의 책임을 지지 않습니다.

히토미 펨돔물 첫 구매자들은 9000원을 할인받을 수 있다는 거. 우선 메루카리에서 마음에 드는 물품을 고른다. 디시앱 설치 전체리스트 로그인 회사소개 광고안내 이용약관 개인정보처리. Dc official app 토갤러는 갤러리에서 권장하는 비회원 전용 갤닉네임입니다. Com › mgallery › board오덕닷컴 써보신분 질문 좀 게임보이 마이너 갤러리. 히토미 서큐버스

히토미 정신병 Com › mgallery › board요즘 일옥 구매대행 진짜 다 개창렬으로 바꼈네 닌텐도 마이너. 오덕 닷컴 온라인 상품의 옥션구매를 중계 대행하는 서비스. ② 사이버머니를 입금하실 때에는 하여야 자동으로 확인이 완료됩니다. 아래의 표기된 기간은 ‘국제배송 출하 후’ 소요되는 예상 배송 기간입니다. 마비노기 모바일 마이너 갤러리 r76 판. 히토미 주소변경

히토미 전처녀 오덕닷컴 회원가입을 마치고, 그럼 이러한 페이지가 나옵니다. 오덕닷컴은 일본내 온라인 상품의 옥션구매를 중계, 대행하는 서비스를 제공하는 업체로 재고를 보유하지 않으며, 상품의 이미지 및 등록내용에 관해서 일체의 책임을. 추가 비용이 발생하지만 돈 몇천원 아낀다고 할게 못됨. 최근 방문 메루카리 같은 경우는 보통 판매자가 부담하니까 그냥. 오덕닷컴을 선택한 가장 큰 이유는 바로 이것, 하필 남은 마지막 매물이 q라니 세상 억까가 또 없습니다 dc official app. 히토미 시리즈물

힡5미 오덕닷컴을 선택한 가장 큰 이유는 바로 이것. 마비노기 모바일 마이너 갤러리 r76 판. 첫 구매자들은 9000원을 할인받을 수 있다는 거. 일본 메루카리 구매대행 i 배대지 오덕닷컴 이용 방법, 후기 네이버 블로그 toy 16개의 글 목록열기. 우선 메루카리에서 마음에 드는 물품을 고른다.

히토미 일본어 공부 디시 Com › mgallery › board백붕이의 메루카리 첫경험 후기 + 오덕닷컴 대세는 백합 마이너. 그래 여긴 뭐 대행수수료 무료니까 이해할 수 있음. 여러모로 괜찮은 듯해서 오덕닷컴을 통해 메루카리 구매대행을 진행하였다. Com › offer › mindex오덕닷컴 해외경매대행, 해외구매대행, 해외배송대행. 오덕닷컴은 회원과 재화등의 공급시기에 관하여 별도의 약정이 없는 한, 재화등이 오덕닷컴의 일본 사무소에 도착한 날부터 7일 이내에 재화 등을 배송할 수 있도록 포장 등 기타의 필요한 조치를 취합니다.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.