올해로 창립 20주년을 맞은 미국의 북한인권단체 리버티 인 노스 코리아’, 즉 링크가 올해 36명의 탈북 난민을 구출했다고 밝혔습니다.

Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

외국계여서 그런지 확실히 수평적이고 상호 존중 문화가 잘 잡혀있어요. Liberty in north korea 약칭 link 여기얍. 勺 북한 출신 청년이 미국 출신 청년에게 소개해 준 노래는. Link와 함께 코크리 로서 각자가 가진 재능을 마음껏 발휘해보세요.

Orgliberty In North Korea.

Kr링크ㅣlinkliberty In North Korea 리버티인노스코리아 한국 지부.

올해로 창립 20주년을 맞은 미국의 북한인권단체 리버티 인 노스 코리아, 즉 링크가 올해 36명의 탈북 난민을 구출했다고 밝혔습니다.

북한 인권 개선을 위한 단체 리버티 인 노스 코리아 링크, 고향에서 오신 분들이 직접 만드는 변화. 다양한 방식으로 사회 문제 해결을 꿈꾸는 헤이그라운드 멤버 여러분. Liberty in north korea. 은주 님의 이야기를 들어주셔서 감사합니다.

Link cocreators는 하나의 목표를 두고 팀으로서 함께 나아갑니다.. 2021년 12월 10일 세계 인권의 날 북한 사람들의 자유를 응원하고 지지하는 청년들이 한자리에 모였습니다.. 고향에서 오신 분들이 직접 만드는 변화..

리버티인노스코리아 애드보커시펠로우 미국 스피치 대외활동 북한 북한. William faulkner i would never. 은주 님의 이야기를 들어주셔서 감사합니다. 본부를 둔 리버티 인 노스 코리아link는 탈북민들이 미국 시민권을 얻도록, 링크는 자유, 인권, 포용과 협력의 가치를 만들고 실천하는 팀입니다.

전체 영상은 유튜브 윗싸이더에서 만나보세요, Link cocreators 프로그램에서 어떤 활동을 할지 궁금하시죠, 전 세계 사람들에게 자신의 이야기를 들려주고, 가슴 아픈 경험을 다시 꺼내는 건 큰 용기입니다.

277 Likes, 12 Comments Northkoreaneunhi On Octo Cocreatorproject 리버티인노스코리아 Freenorthkoreans Libertyinnorthkorea♥ Linkcreator2021 Never Be Afraid To Raise Your Voice For Honesty And Truth And Compassion Against Injustice And Lying And Greed.

지피티가 다 말해줌 한국기업의 자기자본이익률이 올라가고있다 과거의 일본도 이러한 과정을 거친걸로 안다 지피티를 잘 쓰려면 질문의 방향이 올바라야, 리버티 인 노스 코리아liberty in north korea, 약칭 link, 이하 링크는 2004년 미국 대학생들의 인권 운동에서 출발한 비영리 단체이자 국제, Kr on ma 링크의 스물한 번째 생일을 축하해 주세요. 고향에서 오신 분들이 직접 만드는 변화, 링크link, liberty in north korea 리버티인노스코리아는 북한 사람들의 자유와 인권을 위해 전세계 사람들과 함께 일하는 국제인권단체입니다.

링크ㅣlinkliberty In North Korea 리버티인노스코리아 한국.

Link는 2004년 재미 교포 학생들의 북한 주민을 위한 학생 행동으로 시작되었습니다, 프로필링크 리버티인노스코리아 열한살의유서 김은주 ontdsesopr33t064l0c17cgtgefcoiaf0603l1f8urenuaf9m69hlrm02lt 6 1 share like comment, If people all over the world would do this, it would change the earth. It maintains an office in seoul, south korea.

2009년 탈북, 2010년 남한에 정착하여 9년 차가 되었다. 올해로 창립 20주년을 맞은 미국의 북한인권단체 리버티 인 노스 코리아’, 즉 링크가 올해 36명의 탈북 난민을 구출했다고 밝혔습니다. 프로필링크 리버티인노스코리아 열한살의유서 김은주 ontdsesopr33t064l0c17cgtgefcoiaf0603l1f8urenuaf9m69hlrm02lt 6 1 share like comment. Com › jootime › 222959432594북한 인권 개선을 위한 단체 리버티 인 노스 코리아 링크 연말파.

손예진 어쩔수가없다 대역 리버티 인 노스 코리아liberty in north korea, link는 미국 롱비치에 등록된 501c3 비영리 단체이다. 프로그램에 대한 자세한 내용이 알고 싶으시면 한국시간 10월 21일 오전 10시에 진행되는 설명회에 참석하세요. 2021년 12월 10일 세계 인권의 날 북한 사람들의 자유를 응원하고 지지하는 청년들이 한자리에 모였습니다. 북한은 분명 전 세계가 함께 마주하고 있는 read more. 복지가 좋고 사람을 잘 챙기고 실수해도 포용해줘요. 섹스킹 같은 사이트

섹트 람쥐 앵커 올해로 창립 20주년을 맞은 미국의 북한인권단체 리버티 인 노스 코리아, 즉 링크가 올해 36명의 탈북 난민을 구출했다고 밝혔습니다. 전 세계 사람들에게 자신의 이야기를 들려주고, 가슴 아픈 경험을 다시 꺼내는 건 큰 용기입니다. 링크 link, liberty in north korea 리버티인노스코리아는 북한 사람들의 자유와 인권을 위해 전세계 사람들과 함께 일하는 국제인권단체입니다. 링크 liberty in north korea @libertyinnk. 리버티 인 노스 코리아 liberty in north korea, link는 미국 롱비치에 등록된 501 c 3 비영리 단체이다. 소람잉

수연 구독자전용 탈북민 영어 교육, 장학금, 체인지메이커, 애드보커시 펠로우 프로그램을 알아보세요. 현재 link 프로그램 코디네이터로 일하고 있으며, 애드보커시 펠로우, 한반도 체인지 메이커의 삶을 살아내고 있는. Kr링크ㅣlinkliberty in north korea 리버티인노스코리아 한국 지부. 저는 중국 문화와 심리학을 복수전공했으며, 현재 고려대학교. 대학생들의 열정으로 시작된 움직임이 20년의. 수아 사망

술취한 섹스 개요 편집 리버티 인 노스 코리아 liberty in north korea, 약칭 link, 이하 링크는 2004년 미국 대학생들의 인권 운동에서 출발한 비영리 단체이자 국제 인권 단체이다. Likes, 6 comments libertyinnk. 고향에서 오신 분들이 직접 만드는 변화. 2009년 탈북, 2010년 남한에 정착하여 9년 차가 되었다. 다양한 방식으로 사회 문제 해결을 꿈꾸는 헤이그라운드 멤버 여러분.

소악마 여캐 리버티 인 노스 코리아liberty in north korea, link는 미국 롱비치에 등록된 501c3 비영리 단체이다. 지피티가 다 말해줌 한국기업의 자기자본이익률이 올라가고있다 과거의 일본도 이러한 과정을 거친걸로 안다 지피티를 잘 쓰려면 질문의 방향이 올바라야. Org › wiki › liberty_in_north_korealiberty in north korea wikipedia. ️ 2024년에 함께할 advocacy fellows를 모집합니다. Liberty in north korea 약칭 link 여기얍.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.