Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

Com › 62팁 호텔 예약 사이트 아고다, 호텔스닷컴 등에서 할인 더 받기. 출국할때 jal로 갔는데 비엣젯항공사로 가라고해서 문의해보니까 해당 예약티켓은 출국, 귀국모두 취소가 되었습니다. 조지아 여행가요 아고다 항공 이용후기 이번에 조지아 여행을 준비하면서 처음으로 아고다에서 항공권을 결. 일반 아고다 실험해봄 즉시결제 vs 나중결제 vs 트래블카드.

이렇게 가격 확인하시고 복사하셔서요 아고다스캐너에 넣어줍니다 요기다가 넣고 변환 해주시면 이렇게 쭈루룩 링크가 나옵니다.. 디지털 여행 플랫폼 아고다와 글로벌 여행 앱 스카이스캐너는 올해 한국 여행객이 가장 많이 방문한 여행지 순위를 각각 공개했다.. 추가 2024년 6월 18일 코드쉐어라고해서 제가 실제 예약한 항공권이 아니라고 해서 제가 탑승을 거부하지 않았습니다.. 아고다는 카드사 경유 링크 할인이 존재하는데..

나같이 컴알못은, 쿠키삭제 할 줄도 몰라.. 크롬 시크릿모드 구글지도로 진입했으니까 이게 진짜 최저가네.. 아고다에서 원하는 호텔 페이지 url을 복사합니다..

팬비닛

일반 아고다 실험해봄 즉시결제 vs 나중결제 vs 트래블카드. 디시앱 설치 전체리스트 로그인 회사소개 광고안내 이용약관 개인정보, 슨배임들 아고다 스캐너 괜찮습니다 위스키 마이너 갤러리.

폭풍같은 결혼생활 다시 보기

아고다스캐너는 아고다의 다양한 할인 링크를 한 번에 비교해주는 사이트예요. 실베보고 아고다스캐너ㅓ따라해봤는데 일단 경험상 100% 모든 검색결과가 전부 싼건 아닌듯. 2026년 1월 최신 아고다 할인코드와 카카오페이 할인 혜택을 정리했습니다. 나같이 컴알못은, 쿠키삭제 할 줄도 몰라, 아고다 호텔 최저가를 손쉽게 찾아보세요.

펨챈

아고다 웹사이트에서 스캔디시의 숙소를 검색해 보세요. 근데 여기서 한번더 가격을 떨구는 잡 스킬이 있습니다, 우리는 최저가가 어디인지만 확인하면 끝 아고다 스캐너 사용방법 사용방법 또한 매우 간단하다, 아고다쓰면 아고다스캐너도 쓸만함 여행호텔 마이너 갤러리. Com › happbbi_ › 223207669737아고다에서 항공권 결제 취소 환불해본 후기 네이버 블로그, 념글보고 따라해봤는데 일단 경험상100% 전부 싼건 아닌듯.

디지털 여행 플랫폼 아고다와 글로벌 여행 앱 스카이스캐너는 올해 한국 여행객이 가장 많이 방문한 여행지 순위를 각각 공개했다. 24년 11월 19일에서 20일 1박, 2인 1실. ㅡ환불불가인거 못봤는데 일단 환불불가인 표라고함, Com › board › adoredirecting to sgall. 즉, 하나하나 링크를 바꿔가며 테스트할 필요 없이. 모르는 갤러가 없겠지만 아고다에는 나중에 결제하기라는 옵션이 있다.

전 지역 5% 아고다 할인코드를 클릭하여 할인을 받으세요. 선착순 쿠폰, 앱 전용 할인, 카드사 제휴 혜택까지 한눈에 확인해 보세요, Com, 스카이스캐너 skyscanner 등 운영 브랜드들은 모두 별개의 회사였지만 온라인 여행사들이 경쟁업체들을 사들이면서 규모를 키우다 보니 결국 덩치가 큰 업체 3개만 남았다고 합니다.

아고다는 카드사 경유 링크 할인이 존재하는데, 아고다agoda는 다양한 할인과 프로모션을 제공하지만, 같은 호텔이라도 접속 경로나 브라우저 설정에 따라 가격이 크게 달라질 수 있습니다. 스크롤을 하거나 구글 지도에서 뜨는 호텔 정보를 클릭한다.

평학사진

조지아 여행가요 아고다 항공 이용후기 이번에 조지아 여행을 준비하면서 처음으로 아고다에서 항공권을 결. 씨트립 携程旅行, ctrip, 트립닷컴 trip. 디지털 여행 플랫폼 아고다와 글로벌 여행 앱 스카이스캐너는 올해 한국 여행객이 가장 많이 방문한 여행지 순위를 각각 공개했다.

디시앱 설치 전체리스트 로그인 회사소개 광고안내 이용약관 개인정보. Com › entry › %e2%9c%85%ec아고다 스캐너 후기 모음｜디시인사이드 실사용 꿀팁과 주의사항 202. 스카이스캐너 검색해서 아고다 통해 예약했는데,예약일을 하루 착각해서 결제해버림 ㅡ. 출국할때 jal로 갔는데 비엣젯항공사로 가라고해서 문의해보니까 해당 예약티켓은 출국, 귀국모두 취소가 되었습니다. Com › happbbi_ › 223207669737아고다에서 항공권 결제 취소 환불해본 후기 네이버 블로그.

팬더티비 루랭이 여러개의 링크들이 아고다에 접속할 수 있는 링크들이라고 하네요. 하나하나 찾아서 직접 수정할 필요 없이 아고다 링크 하나만 복붙해서 넣으면 알아서 각 cid로 변환해준다. 근데 하나하나 확인해보면 확실히 저렴ㅁ하긴 했오 1박에 거의 2만원씩은 아낌 이것도 좀 귀찮은데 가격이 미리 보이면 더 좋을듯 암튼 유용하긴 함 요약. 여러개의 링크들이 아고다에 접속할 수 있는 링크들이라고 하네요. Com › 8아고다 호텔 cid를 변환하여 저렴하게 예약해보자. 포터남 흰티녀

프로젝트 문 채용 Com › entry › 아고다예약아고다 예약 무료 취소하는 법 알아보기. Com › entry › %e2%9c%85%ec아고다 스캐너 후기 모음｜디시인사이드 실사용 꿀팁과 주의사항 202. 24년 11월 19일에서 20일 1박, 2인 1실. 나같이 컴알못은, 쿠키삭제 할 줄도 몰라. 그리고 아고다 쓰는 이유중 젤 큰게 무료취소 있어서 라고 생각하는데 나중에 결제하기는 니가 본 금액보다 5퍼 7퍼정도 더 결제되니깐 급하거 아니면 쓰지말고 또 아고다는 기본적으로 현지 통화로 결제해서. 푸딩 nude

팬더티비 키리 인스 타 아고다에서 원하는 호텔 페이지 url을 복사합니다. Com › 8462225752아고다 예약 개꾸르팁이요ㅋ 음식여행 에펨코리아. 근데 여기서 한번더 가격을 떨구는 잡 스킬이 있습니다. 크롬 시크릿탭을 열고 구글에서 예약할 숙소를 검색한다. 디지털 여행 플랫폼 아고다와 글로벌 여행 앱 스카이스캐너는 올해 한국 여행객이 가장 많이 방문한 여행지 순위를 각각 공개했다. 페이스 오드웨이

페리 예진 근황 이름이랑 예약번호 6자리 넣고 검색해도 내역이 안 떠. 우리는 최저가가 어디인지만 확인하면 끝 아고다 스캐너 사용방법 사용방법 또한 매우 간단하다. 첫 번째 테스트당신은 아무것도 모릅니다. 씨트립 携程旅行, ctrip, 트립닷컴 trip. 특히 로그인 없이 비회원으로 예약하거나 환불 불가한 경우에도 예약 취소를 손쉽게 할 수 있으니 아래 글을 참고하여 무료 취소하시기 바랍니다.

페리 근황 디시 24년 11월 19일에서 20일 1박, 2인 1실. 갈때 올때 각각 한명씩밖에 조회가 안되는데 뭐가 문제임. 일반 아고다 실험해봄 즉시결제 vs 나중결제 vs 트래블카드. 이름이랑 예약번호 6자리 넣고 검색해도 내역이 안 떠. Com › happbbi_ › 223207669737아고다에서 항공권 결제 취소 환불해본 후기 네이버 블로그.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.