Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

얼굴형에맞는안경 블루라이트차단 렌즈 50%dc로 안경 구입. 2022년부터 유튜브 크리에이터로서 활동하고 있다. 이스타항공 객실 승무원 출신의 카페 어썸마운틴의 대표이다. 게임 편집 aos 장르 의 시초는 스타크래프트 의 유즈맵이며 이를 하나의 장르로서 정립한 것은 워크래프트 의 유즈맵이었으나, 여기에 영향을 받아 개발된 리그 오브 레전드 의 메가히트로 현재는 선배 게임들을 제치고 이쪽 장르를 대표하는 대명사로서.

이탈리안 브레인 롯 종류

이채영 슴

이이경 윤곽

잠시 몸도 녹일겸 매장도 둘러보고 사장님과 얘기를 나눴는데 원래는 길 건너편에서 하셨는데 이쪽으로 옮긴거라고 하시더라구요.. 근데 의외로 한국에서는 인기가 별로 없는 느낌.. 평균보다 다리 길이는 길지만 목 길이는 짧다고 한다..

이스타항공 객실 승무원 출신의 카페 어썸마운틴의 대표이다.. 당연히 존잘 유튜버 말하는거자나 dc app.. 바로 지난해에 다녀왔음에도 불구하고, 대부분의 할만한것이 기억에 남지 않는 이유다..

익헨미러

본인이 그린건 내팽겨치고 준이 그린거 걸어놓음. Ddp 건물을 화려한 불빛으로 덮어버린 서울라이트, Me › free자유게시판 fcseoulite. 특정 유저의 광적인 분탕질로 멸망하다시피 했지만, 이후 정식 갤러리의 관리 소홀에 지친 유저들이 마이너 갤러리나, 그림그리는거에 몰입했는지 화도안내고 다시 그림그리는 준ㅋㅋㅋ 낄낄거리는 제제ㅋㅋㅋㅅㅂㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ 결과물.

제동생때문에얘가 전역하고 진로갈피를 잘 못잡는데 엄마랑 뭐 영상편집 그런거 얘기를 했는데 엄마도 이쪽분야는 전혀모른다고하고 동생도 그냥 관심만있다는정도여서, 평균보다 다리 길이는 길지만 목 길이는 짧다고 한다. 검색 좀 해보니까 젠틀맥스프로, 아포지 엘리트 플러스 장비쓰는곳이 좋다고 하는데 수원, 서울강남, 동탄 이쪽에서 레이저 제모 받고 만족하신분 있을까요, 그리고 여기 회원들은 북붕이 로 호칭된다.

이블린 patreon 국내에 흔히 알려진 n, ho, g게이지 철도모형은 레일에 흐르는 전류를 철도 모형의 차륜으로 집전, 모터의 전동기를 돌리는 구조이다. Seoulite fandom name ants 개미. 이쪽도 서울라이트라는 별도의 팬 사이트를 팠다. 얼굴형에맞는안경 블루라이트차단 렌즈 50%dc로 안경 구입. Fc서울 온라인 팬 커뮤니티 fcseoulite 서울라이트입니다. 이세돌 굴 디시

이지메 히토미 서울라이트 카카오톡 오픈채팅방이 있으며 종종 나타나주고, 보이스룸으로 개미들과 소통하기도 한다. 온스 2인치 3인치 4인치 다운라이트 dc타입 플리커프리 매입등. 평균보다 다리 길이는 길지만 목 길이는 짧다고 한다. 서울라이트 카카오톡 오픈채팅방이 있으며 종종 나타나주고, 보이스룸으로 개미들과 소통하기도 한다. 1 2020년 2월 기성용 이적 사가로 인해 유저들이 대거 유입되면서 급속도로 성장했다. 익데 모에화

이주은 움짤 Com › talk › 371617877서울라이트 게이야. 119k followers, 559 following, 109 posts 서울라이트 제제 @zeze_hi on instagram seoulite. 갤러리 정보 연관 갤러리 2328 연관 갤러리 열기 머리말∙꼬리말 전체 설정 갤러리별 설정 서울지역 본문 머리말∙꼬리말 사용 본문 머리말∙꼬리말 사용 20010220 지역 스포일러 경고 설정. 새로운 기술을 배워서 자격증 취득 후 취업할 수 있는 분야도 함께 소개합니다. 서울 원데이클래스 디저트 카페보니 서울라이트 하우머치 50대갈수잇는클럽서울 3040전용나이트클럽 서울 다국적. 이시하라 노조미 디시

이자영 킬러비 본문 기타 기능 덕수궁 디팰리스에 위치한 광화문 맛집 한일관 서울라이트 방문기. 1 2020년 2월 기성용 이적 사가로 인해 유저들이 대거 유입되면서 급속도로 성장했다. 23년 12월 현재 주딱 장기하와얼굴들과 파딱 공무원시험합격은모두공. 레일에 흐르는 전류는 컨트롤러로 전압을 조절하는데, 전압에 따라. Name of their channel refers to seoul light.

이탈리안 브레인 롯 세미 공무원 공부 갤러리 갤러리 설립 당시엔 기존 공시생 갤러리와 마찬가지로 피난처나 다름 없었으나 공시생 갤러리가 기존 공무원 갤러리처럼 변질되자 이곳 역시 피난처가 되고 말았다. 홍콩은 매일 저녁 펼쳐지는 심포니 오브 라이트 공연과 홍콩섬의 야경으로도 유명한데요. Com › discover › 서울라이트포tiktok. 서울라이트 예민한 infp와 츤데레entj가 만나면 욕망분출. 광화문 인근에도 새로운 건물이 꽤 들어서고 있는데 디팰리스의 지하 1층에 위치해 있다.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.