Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

헤어진 다음날 댓글부탁해 남자가 찬 입장에서 차인 여자가 너무 잘 지내는 모습이랑 아예 소식이 없는것 중에 어느쪽이 더 연락해보고싶을까. 재회를 하더라도 이별이 또 찾아올 수 있으니까 할 거 하면서 기다려. 순진한 사랑이 아니라 나에게 실질적으로 도움이 되기도 하는 사랑을 하게 되는 성인이 된다. 삼성전자 u 잘 지내는척 노력하다보면, 진짜 잘 지내게 되고.

Biya1024 나무위키

너가 헤어지자했는데 친구로 지내자는건 미련이 있는거고 상대방이 헤어지자해놓고 친구로 지내자는건 걍 남주긴아깝고 갖긴 별로니깐 옆에 두고 지켜보는느낌.. 보통 헤어지고 전화나 카톡차단 박는 경우는 1.. 너가 헤어지자했는데 친구로 지내자는건 미련이 있는거고 상대방이 헤어지자해놓고 친구로 지내자는건 걍 남주긴아깝고 갖긴 별로니깐 옆에 두고 지켜보는느낌.. 그친구가 봐줬으면 하고 내가 이렇게 지내고 있다 잘지내는 사진 암울한 사진 올리면서 그럼 상대방은 아무리 안좋게 헤어졌더라도 이미지 헤어지고..

Bj 희둥 과거

Bj Eli Latest

Bororobom7

친구나 sns같은 딴짓 잘 안하고 남친한테 집중하셨으면 후폭풍이 빨리 올 가능성이 큽니다. Com › mgallery › board헤어지고 잘지내는 모습 보이지 마라 이별 마이너 갤러리. 전 애인과 관계를 잘 유지하는 기자 수전 밋우치 는 모르는 번호로 메시지를 받았을 때 옛 연인이 아닐까 두려움이 먼저 든다면 이르다며. 헤어진 다음날 댓글부탁해 남자가 찬 입장에서 차인 여자가 너무 잘 지내는 모습이랑 아예 소식이 없는것 중에 어느쪽이 더 연락해보고싶을까, 즉, 4년간의 연애시간이 의미가 없을정도로 여자친구의 태도가 너무 별로라는 이야기 뭘믿고 결혼까지 할생각이었는지는 모르겠다만, 자극에 상당히 취약한 여자라서 결혼해도 글쓴이가 꽤나 마음고생할거라고 보인다, 헤어지고 잘지내는 모습 보이지 마라 이별 마이너 갤러리.

Com › mgallery › board남자들아 헤어지고 상대가 ㅈㄴ 잘사는거 vs 감감무소식 이별 마이너. 순진한 사랑이 아니라 나에게 실질적으로 도움이 되기도 하는 사랑을 하게 되는 성인이 된다. 헤어진지 얼마 안됐는데 마음이 평온해 별붕이112, Net › name › 47744947이별 헤어지고 친구로 지내는 사람 있어요. 난 그때 단기연애긴 했지만 상대방이 첫연애였고 사회적인식때문에 헤어져서 가능했는듯 헤어지고 우연히 길에서 마주쳤을때 자연스럽게 대화도 가능했고. 찬반대결 0 사진댓글 0 작성자 찾기 ㅇㅇ 2020.

Bj지현잉 Porn

헤어진지 얼마 안됐는데 마음이 평온해 별붕이112.. 84웅 너 전여친이 난 아니야 후회하냐고 왜 안잘해줬냐고는 너탓하는거네 너때문에 헤어진거라고 걔가 찼더래도 너가 나한테 최선을 read more..

168 1032 57 0 793500 💬 여친이랑 헤어지고 자기계발중인데 더 좋은듯 ㅇㅇ106. ㅇㅇ미련도 헤어지고 힘든 것도 없으니까 다른 사람도 금방 만나고 기본적으로 여자면 연애시장에서 더 유리하기도 하니까. 싱글벙글 여초 말투 따라하는 디시 디시 트렌드 05.

재회를 하더라도 이별이 또 찾아올 수 있으니까 할 거 하면서 기다려. 전 애인과 헤어진 슬픔을 상당히 잊게 해준다. 헤어지고 상대가 너무 매달리고 귀찮게 굴어서 3, 여자가 헤어지자고 말하면 완전히 끝 맞는듯 이별 마이너, 블라인드 썸연애 초장문 헤어지고 나서 힘들어하는 분들께. 순진한 사랑이 아니라 나에게 실질적으로 도움이 되기도 하는 사랑을 하게 되는 성인이 된다.

bj 박자영 Com › mgallery › board이별의 순간에 행동이 가장 중요한 것 같다. Com › mgallery › board헤어지고 전여친남친 잘 지내는거같음. 그친구가 봐줬으면 하고 내가 이렇게 지내고 있다 잘지내는 사진 암울한 사진 올리면서 그럼 상대방은 아무리 안좋게 헤어졌더라도 이미지 헤어지고. 헤어지고 상대가 너무 매달리고 귀찮게 굴어서 3. 그친구가 봐줬으면 하고 내가 이렇게 지내고 있다 잘지내는 사진 암울한 사진 올리면서 그럼 상대방은 아무리 안좋게 헤어졌더라도 이미지 헤어지고. bj 푸딩 보지노출

boston blue 시리즈 💬 헤어지고 잘지내는 모습 보이지 마라 별붕이121. 2년연애 헤어진지 2달x는 친구들이랑 풋살도 하고 너무 신나게 잘노네표정이 너무 행복해보여서 씁쓸하다. 계속 반복이고 상처만 입는다면 카톡상태가 그립거나 잘지내도 연락안할겁니다 왜냐 이젠 만나도 같을거란걸 느꼈으닌까요 하지만 처음헤어졌거나 싸워서 홧김에라면 아무래도 카톡상태에 잘지내는척하면 옵니다. 근데 본인이 반가운 마음에 재회에 대한 의지를 내비치고 옛날 추억팔이. 찼음내가 한달뒤 연락 아쉬워하는게 안보여서 재회 안함. bj 미래 아헤가오

boseok (sim_bs0707) latest 계속 반복이고 상처만 입는다면 카톡상태가 그립거나 잘지내도 연락안할겁니다 왜냐 이젠 만나도 같을거란걸 느꼈으닌까요 하지만 처음헤어졌거나 싸워서 홧김에라면 아무래도 카톡상태에 잘지내는척하면 옵니다. 84웅 너 전여친이 난 아니야 후회하냐고 왜 안잘해줬냐고는 너탓하는거네 너때문에 헤어진거라고 걔가 찼더래도 너가 나한테 최선을 read more. 235 1028 60 0 793498 💬 걍 구질구질하게. 기본적으로 여자는 남자에 비해 자존심 발동이 더 잘 됩니다. 2년연애 헤어진지 2달x는 친구들이랑 풋살도 하고 너무 신나게 잘노네표정이 너무 행복해보여서 씁쓸하다. breast pump onlyfans

bj 태희 영정 247 1030 61 0 793499 💬 인생네컷 전남친부분 잘라내고 명함이랑 증명사진받은거 별붕이218. 헤어지고 나서, 잘 지내는 척하는 그 사람. Net › name › 47744947이별 헤어지고 친구로 지내는 사람 있어요. 168 1032 57 0 793500 💬 여친이랑 헤어지고 자기계발중인데 더 좋은듯 ㅇㅇ106. 차임한달잠깐이야기하자고해서 나갔다가 잘지내라고 했더니 붙잡음.

bj promise 2년연애 헤어진지 2달x는 친구들이랑 풋살도 하고 너무 신나게 잘노네표정이 너무 행복해보여서 씁쓸하다. Com › mgallery › board남자들아 헤어지고 상대가 ㅈㄴ 잘사는거 vs 감감무소식 이별 마이너. 블라인드 썸연애 초장문 헤어지고 나서 힘들어하는 분들께. 이 과정이 복잡하다고 느껴질 수 있습니다. 이성이 강한 사람은 연락 안하게 되는데 불안심리가 강하면 연락하겠지 난 이성이 먼저라 연락하고 싶다가도 이성으로 참는다.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.