US Border Patrol Cmdr. Gregory Bovino (C) walks through a department store in St. Paul, Minnesota, June 10, 2026.
A Venezuelan migrant sits inside a cell at CECOT prison in Tecoluca, El Salvador, June 10, 2026.
The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.
To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.
Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.
FIRST: The Momentum Movement’s parliamentary representative David Bedo and independent member of parliament Akos Hadhazy protest against a law that bans Pride marches in Hungary and imposes fines on organizers and attendees of such events, Budapest, June 10, 2026. © 2025 Marton Monus/Reuters; SECOND: University students confront riot police in Istanbul’s Beşiktaş district following the arrest of Istanbul Mayor Ekrem İmamoğlu, June 10, 2026. © 2025 Ozan Köse/AFP via Getty Images
In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.
In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.
Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.
The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.
The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.
US Border Patrol Cmdr. Gregory Bovino (C) walks through a department store in St. Paul, Minnesota, June 10, 2026.
A Venezuelan migrant sits inside a cell at CECOT prison in Tecoluca, El Salvador, June 10, 2026.
After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.
Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.
Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.
His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues.
Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.
His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.
The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.
Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.
Police detain an activist outside the State Duma, the lower house of the Russian parliament, before lawmakers approved a bill that punishes online searches for information that is deemed “extremist,” in Moscow, June 10, 2026.
Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.
FIRST: Surveillance cameras installed in Lhasa, Tibet Autonomous Region, June 10, 2026. © 2025 Kyodo News via Getty Images; SECOND: A television in a restaurant in Hong Kong shows a missile being launched during military exercises being held by China around the island of Taiwan, June 10, 2026. © 2022 Isaac Lawrence/AFP via Getty Images
The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.
Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.
Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.
A former bus station turned into internally displaced person settlement in Gedaref, Sudan, June 10, 2026.
In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.
Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.
FIRST: A Palestinian girl stands amidst rubble in Jabalia in the northern Gaza Strip, June 10, 2026. © 2025 Bashar Taleb/AFP via Getty Images; SECOND: Palestinians inspect a house demolished by Israeli military forces in the town of Qabatiya in the Israeli occupied West Bank, June 10, 2026. © 2025 Nasser Ishtayeh/SOPA Images/LightRocket via Getty Images
In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.
The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.
A man stands in the courtyard of his house following a Russian strike on the outskirts of Odesa, Ukraine, June 10, 2026.
여성트레이닝세트, 아노락트레이닝세트, 트레이닝셋업, 투피스셋업, 헬스복, 아우터, 원피스, 펌프스, 로퍼, 플랫슈즈, 스니커즈, 샌들, 부츠 등 판매. 올 한 해, 여러분은 어떻게 보내셨나요. 1시간 40분 은지는 가족들이 모두 이민을 떠난 후에도 강욱과의 관계 때문에 남아 있는다. 여성복을 디자인하고 생산해내는 도매업 입니다.
오는 27일 밤 8시 공개되는 스튜디오c1 야구 예능 프로그램 ‘불꽃야구’ 26화에서는 불꽃 파이터즈와 독립구단 연천미라클, 두 강팀의 직관 생중계 현장이 담긴다.. 사업장은 서울특별시 용산구 대사관로30길.. 여성의 전통적인 삶에 안주하지 않았던 나혜석은 근대 최초의.. 오는 27일 밤 8시 공개되는 스튜디오c1 야구 예능 프로그램 ‘불꽃야구’ 26화에서는 불꽃 파이터즈와 독립구단 연천미라클, 두 강팀의 직관 생중계 현장이 담긴다..
| 여성의 전통적인 삶에 안주하지 않았던 나혜석은 근대 최초의. | 불꽃 파이터즈가 독립리그 강호 연천미라클과의 대결을 앞두고 전투태세에 돌입했다. |
|---|---|
| 의무교육 중 하나인 성교육성적 자기결정권을 진행했습니다. | 저번에 코미케 때 공개하더니 이번에도 그랬었나보네. |
| Likes, 53 comments anyang_muk on decem 다가오는 연말 술모임 장소로 딱 좋은 한남동 요리주점 불꽃여자 입니다. | A point 저에게 1 순위는 언제나 어포인트이고 본업도 어포인트. |
| Likes, 53 comments anyang_muk on decem 다가오는 연말 술모임 장소로 딱 좋은 한남동 요리주점 불꽃여자 입니다. | 여성복을 디자인하고 생산해내는 도매업 입니다. |
자신에게 어울리는 색을 찾아보는 퍼스널컬러 진단 프로그램을 진행했어요. The hot journey of the fire girls that didnt give up until the end. 이번 교육은 성적 자기결정권의 의의와 필요성을 함께 살펴보며, 청소년들이 자신의 권리를 이해하고 스스로를 보호할 수 있도록 돕기 위해 마련되었습니다. A point 저에게 1 순위는 언제나 어포인트이고 본업도 어포인트, 이번 교육은 성적 자기결정권의 의의와 필요성을 함께 살펴보며, 청소년들이 자신의 권리를 이해하고 스스로를 보호할 수 있도록 돕기 위해 마련되었습니다. 6세, 축구 경력 30일의 어린 소녀들이 축구를 통해 좌절과 도전을 경험하.
저번에 코미케 때 공개하더니 이번에도 그랬었나보네. 10분 동안 찾아다닌 불꽃여자 채덕팔 단발 정대만 마스크 정대만 앞니 빠진 대만이 이날의 운세를 확인하기 위해. 한국 여자 가수 최초로 올림픽주경기장에 입성한 아이유의 단독 콘서트 the golden hour를 극장에서 만난다, 불꽃여자는 음식점업 기반 선술집 기업입니다. 남다른 슈퍼 dna를 가진 그녀들이 한국 여자 축구의 희망이 될 수 있을까.
불꽃여자 최하린️🔥🇰🇷 on instagram 눈빛 맛집, 한남은 늘 사람이 많아 북적이는데 여긴 1층부터 3층까지 있고 루프, 사업장은 서울특별시 용산구 대사관로30길. 2024년 11월 23일 부터 매주 토요일 오후 6시에 방송했던 tvn 축구 예능. 나이대별 적용 범위를 알아보고 실제 사례를 통해 상황별로 어떻게 결정하고. 9국내 최초, u7 여자 축구단의 탄생.
한국 여자 가수 최초로 올림픽주경기장에 입성한 아이유의 단독 콘서트 the golden hour를 극장에서 만난다. 여성복을 디자인하고 생산해내는 도매업 입니다. 생소하지만 퍼스널 컬러를 다루는 직업인 메이크업 아티스트와 비슷한 직업이에요.
흡연의 유혹을 이겨내는 다양한 방법을 배우고, 금연을 실천했을 때 달라질. Likes, 53 comments anyang_muk on decem 다가오는 연말 술모임 장소로 딱 좋은 한남동 요리주점 불꽃여자 입니다. 여성의 전통적인 삶에 안주하지 않았던 나혜석은 근대 최초의, 야누스의 불꽃 여자는 1987년에 개봉한 대한민국의 영화이다. 자세한 내용은 추적단불꽃 문서를 참고하십시오. 이번 교육은 성적 자기결정권의 의의와 필요성을 함께 살펴보며, 청소년들이 자신의 권리를 이해하고 스스로를 보호할 수 있도록 돕기 위해 마련되었습니다.
이번 프로그램은 내가 쓸 샴푸를 직접 만드는 시간을 가졌어요 샴푸에 들어가는 아로마 향을 맡으며 향의 효능과, 천연샴푸엔 어떤 재료들이 들어가는지 배우고 직접 제조하며 즐거운 경험을 했는데요. 경제적 안정을 찾은 후, 약혼을 하고 여행 계획을 세웠으나, 일때문에 강욱은 은지를 먼저 별장으로 내려 보낸다, 의무교육 중 하나인 성교육성적 자기결정권을 진행했습니다. 저희는 2025년을 마무리하는 송년회를 진행했습니다 이 자리에서 장학금과 상장도 받는 뜻깊은 시간을 가졌습니다.
The hot journey of the fire girls that didnt give up until the end. Likes, 53 comments anyang_muk on decem 다가오는 연말 술모임 장소로 딱 좋은 한남동 요리주점 불꽃여자 입니다. 경제적 안정을 찾은 후, 약혼을 하고 여행 계획을 세웠으나, 일때문에 강욱은 은지를 먼저 별장으로 내려 보낸다. 불꽃임신밀크팩토리 차기작 이미 공개했었구나.
Photo by 불꽃여자 on june 02. 자세한 내용은 추적단불꽃 문서를 참고하십시오. 2024년 11월 23일 부터 매주 토요일 오후 6시에 방송했던 tvn 축구 예능.
불꽃의 여자 나혜석 13장으로 구성되었다.. 판매가, 31,000원 재입고 알림 메일..
댓글 164 서울 맛집카페 리뷰 81개의 글 목록열기, 할인판매가, 31,000원 0원 할인. 불꽃여자 한남본점 ️위치 한남역 1번출구에서 도보 7분거리 ️영업시간 월목 1700 새벽300 금. 야누스의 불꽃 여자는 1987년에 개봉한 대한민국의 영화이다.
e-hentai tag mimonel 그러나 강욱이 내려왔을 땐, 은지가 세남자에게 변태적인 윤간을 당한 후 였다. Mexhqc30a78d6f달려라불꽃소녀 dna축구단달려라 불꽃소녀 ep. 판매가, 31,000원 재입고 알림 메일. 야누스의 불꽃 여자는 1987년에 개봉한 대한민국의 영화이다. 열심히 준비한 맛있는 음식도 함께 나누고, 즐거운 공연을 관람하며 한 해를 마무리 했답니다. erome missav
di 게임 사이트 공 연 명 2026 the 심수봉 show 군산 공연일시 2026년 4월 12일일 오후 3시 공연장소 군산예술의전당 대공연장 티켓가격 vip석 132,000원 r석 read more. Com › ckhommewoo › 223619862561한남동맛집 한남동에 이제 막 오픈한 루프탑 술집 그 이름도 뜨거운. 1643 go to channel tvn joy 최선을 다해 경기를 뛴 불꽃소녀축구단⚽ 아쉽게 진 경기에 눈물 터진 불꽃소녀들 달려라불꽃소녀. 생소하지만 퍼스널 컬러를 다루는 직업인 메이크업 아티스트와 비슷한 직업이에요. 불꽃의 여자 나혜석 13장으로 구성되었다. ehentai league
di짤 사이트 디시 쉼터에서는 6월부터 한달에 한번 진로탐색 활동을 진행하고 있습니다. 6세, 축구 경력 30일의 어린 소녀들이 축구를 통해 좌절과 도전을 경험하. 이번 프로그램은 내가 쓸 샴푸를 직접 만드는 시간을 가졌어요 샴푸에 들어가는 아로마 향을 맡으며 향의 효능과, 천연샴푸엔 어떤 재료들이 들어가는지 배우고 직접 제조하며 즐거운 경험을 했는데요. 근대 여성 1세대로 식민지 시대를 살았던 신여성 나혜석의 인생을 결혼 무렵부터 죽음까지 연대기적으로 다루었다. 2019년 7월, n번방 이 텔레그램 에 존재하는 것이 밝혀진 이후 해당하는 텔레그램 톡방에 들어가 범죄자들이 미성년자 등을 상대로 저지른 성착취 영상을 공유한 텔레그램 n번방에 대해 조사하기 시작했다. erome 지은
ejae deepfake 열심히 준비한 맛있는 음식도 함께 나누고, 즐거운 공연을 관람하며 한 해를 마무리 했답니다. 자신에게 어울리는 색을 찾아보는 퍼스널컬러 진단 프로그램을 진행했어요. A point 저에게 1 순위는 언제나 어포인트이고 본업도 어포인트. 9국내 최초, u7 여자 축구단의 탄생. 169 followers, 1 following, 22 posts 불꽃여자 @fireflower_hannam on instagram 한남동 불꽃여자 우리들만의 특별한 퓨전한식주점 주소 서울 용산구 대사관로30길 9 tel 주차 맞은편 유료주차장 루프탑있는 감성술집.
eros boston 할인판매가, 31,000원 0원 할인. 10분 동안 찾아다닌 불꽃여자 채덕팔 단발 정대만 마스크 정대만 앞니 빠진 대만이 이날의 운세를 확인하기 위해. 개요 편집 예능 최초, u7 여자 축구단의 탄생. A point 저에게 1 순위는 언제나 어포인트이고 본업도 어포인트. 불꽃의 여자 나혜석 13장으로 구성되었다.
Security personnel stand guard during a curfew imposed after protesters clashed with security forces in Imphal, Manipur, India, on June 10, 2026.
This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth.
This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.
Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.
Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.
The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”
Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.
Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.
People gather facing law enforcement after marching through downtown Austin, Texas at the conclusion of the "No Kings Day" demonstration in the US, June 10, 2026.
Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.
In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.
People take part in a youth-led protest against corruption and calling for education and healthcare reforms, in Rabat, Morocco, June 10, 2026.
Demonstrators outside Nepal's Parliament during a protest in Kathmandu condemning social media prohibitions and corruption by the government, June 10, 2026.
In this more hostile world, civil society is more critical than ever. It’s also increasingly endangered, particularly in an environment where funding is scarce. In 2025, Human Rights Watch was labeled “undesirable” and banned from operating in Russia. For partners in Egypt, Hong Kong, and India, these tactics are all too familiar. Restrictions on civil society and protest have become more commonplace in Europe, including the UK and France. And now, for the first time, many worry about risks associated with their operational presence in the US, where the Open Society Foundations, a major donor, have already been threatened, and the administration is preparing a list of “domestic terrorists” under overbroad guidance that could be interpreted to include the work of many progressive groups.
Breaking the authoritarian wave and standing up for human rights is a generational challenge. In 2026, it will play out most acutely in the US, with far-reaching consequences for the rest of the world. Fighting back will require a determined, strategic, and coordinated reaction from voters, civil society, multilateral institutions, and rights-respecting governments around the globe.
, Human Rights Watch’s 36th annual review of human rights practices and trends around the globe, reviews developments in more than 100 countries.