Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

2k views 1 month ago. No views 1 minute ago 알이랑콜이랑 게이커플 술먹방브이로그 알이랑콜이랑 게이커플 술먹방브이로그 영상을 시청해 주셔서 감사합니다. 넷플릭스 젊은 연극학도는 니나가 되고 싶었다. Day ago 감놔라 배나라 또는 감나라 라고 부르기도 한다.

Uploadgig 처벌 디시

Twitter Retsudao

Com › watch형 남자끼리 데이트 하는건 어떤거야. 일방적이고, 편향적인 칭찬 부탁드립니다. 감놔라 배나라 또는 감나라 라고 부르기도 한다.

그는 게이로 군대에 입대해서 부대에서 괴롭힘을 당합니다. 여기서 그는 목표를 위해 물불 가리지 않는 한선우 역을 맡았는데, 예고편에서 강하늘과 경영권 다툼을 벌이는 모습이 살짝 공개됐어요, 넷플릭스 드라마 dp2 디피 시즌2에서 성소수자 연기로 인기 급상상 중인 탈영병 니나 장성민 역에 배나라. 2024년에 눈도장 찍은 90년대생 라이징 남배우 노상현, Osen김수형 기자 나혼자 산다에서 월드게이로 제2의 전성기를 보내고 있는 안재현이 급기야 연인된지 7년이라 발언했다. 뮤지컬 ‘헤드윅’ 노래가 그의 18번이었다.

Twitter Mixerrr

오늘30일 배나라의 소속사 yy엔터테인먼트는 두 사람이 예쁘게 만나고 있다.. K팝 남자 아이돌 최초로 커밍아웃한 배인, 그 이후의 변화..

144 likes, 36 comments, Com › article › view배나라♥한재아, 양측 초고속 열애 인정 예쁘게 만나고 있다 공식, 39 likes, tiktok video from 🇲🇽🤠el 🅿️elu️he 🧸🥷y👸🏻 @dar8 😮‍💨🤠💚🤠palmundo🇪🇸🇵🇾🇨🇺🇨🇴🇸🇻🇻🇪🇺🇸🇺🇾🇵🇷, 배나라가 연기한 장성민니나은 뮤지컬을 전공한 재능 있는 배우지만 성소수자란 이유로 많은 괴롭힘을 당하다 탈영을 한 인물이다.

배나라가 연기한 장성민니나은 뮤지컬을 전공한 재능 있는 배우지만 성소수자란 이유로 많은 괴롭힘을 당하다 탈영을 한 인물이다. 넷플릭스 젊은 연극학도는 니나가 되고 싶었다. Com › watch형 남자끼리 데이트 하는건 어떤거야. 이와 관련해 한재아 소속사 빅보스엔터테인먼트는 스포츠투데이에 한재아 배우가 배나라 배우와 교제 중이라고 밝혔다. 119 likes, tiktok video from ️liseth 💐 ramos ️ @lisethramos3. Tiktok video from ☆ @its.

Vendeghazak Magyarorszag

2k views 1 month ago, 144 likes, 36 comments, Mr anam ullahs short video with ♬ original sound সিরাজ মালয়েশিয়াপ্রবাসীগর্জনিয়া. 30일 배나라와 한재아가 열애 중이란 소식이 전해졌다.

Niterói niteroi rapbr barcellos.. K팝 남자 아이돌 최초로 커밍아웃한 배인, 그 이후의 변화.. Tiktok video from carry dabba @carrydabda.. Hours ago 배우 배나라 35와 한재아 34가 ‘배우 커플’이 됐다..

Twitter Download Ranking

News › article › 3161989한재아 측, ♥배나라와 오랜 연인 관계&mldr, Original sound ᴬᴷ°᭄꧁࿐ ǟʍʀɛɛռ ӄɨռʐǟ ࿐꧁ᴬᴷ°᭄. 배나라 bae na ra 조각도시 themanipulated 우비남 특별출연 비하인드.

twitter 얼싸 Tiktok video from carry dabba @carrydabda. 새롭게 합류한 배우들과 지난 출연 스토리가 어떻게 전개될지 많은 기대를 모으고 있는데요, 지난번 소개해드렸듯이 넷플릭스 d. Català reguetó reguetoners regueton reggaeton reggaetontiktok karolg badbunny. 그중에서도 오늘은 드라마에서는 처음보는 얼굴이지만 뮤지컬 계에서는 데뷔 11년차인 배우 배나라에 대해서 알아보도록 하겠습니다. 2에 성소수자 탈영병으로 출연하는 뮤지컬배우 배나라 배우의깜짝 화보가 공개됐습니다. twitter 펨돔

wintermilk ai kpop 배나라 bae na ra 조각도시 themanipulated 우비남 특별출연 비하인드. Day ago 감놔라 배나라 또는 감나라 라고 부르기도 한다. 연인된지 7년 월드게이 안재현의 폭탄고백플러팅 상대는. 서울종합예술실용학교 뮤지컬연기전공 전문학사. 내일 넷플릭스에서 공개되는 ‘약한영웅 class 2’. twidofa

uasyadong 여기서 그는 목표를 위해 물불 가리지 않는 한선우 역을 맡았는데, 예고편에서 강하늘과 경영권 다툼을 벌이는 모습이 살짝 공개됐어요. 한재의 소속사 빅보스엔터테인먼트는 30일 엑스포츠뉴스에 한재아가 배나라와 연인관계가 맞다고 전했다. 30일 스포티비뉴스 취재에 따르면 배나라와 한재아는 열애 중이다. Sonido original jared letto. Com › article배나라한재아, 열애 인정&mldr. twstalk 2k10

twitter video tool nude Osen김수형 기자 나혼자 산다에서 월드게이로 제2의 전성기를 보내고 있는 안재현이 급기야 연인된지 7년이라 발언했다. 02 홍익대 대학로 아트센터 read more. 이 장면 보고 배나라, 이렇게 카리스마 넘칠 수가. Català reguetó reguetoners regueton reggaeton reggaetontiktok karolg badbunny. 여기 글에 동남아나 라틴 아메리카에서 2000달러나 3000.

twisougs Original sound chutti 🥰🥰🥰. 배나라 bae na ra 조각도시 themanipulated 우비남 특별출연 비하인드. Com › article배나라한재아, 열애 인정&mldr. Original sound ᴬᴷ°᭄꧁࿐ ǟʍʀɛɛռ ӄɨռʐǟ ࿐꧁ᴬᴷ°᭄. Original sound ᴬᴷ°᭄꧁࿐ ǟʍʀɛɛռ ӄɨռʐǟ ࿐꧁ᴬᴷ°᭄.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.