신입사원 비즈니스 예절 꼭 읽어보고 첫 출근하기 티그리스.

Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

좋아요 207개,재미있는 @user7316 님의 tiktok 틱톡 동영상 신입사원 신혜의 첫 출근과 예상치 못한 사건들. 작은 수첩 & 볼펜회사에 필기류나 남는 수첩 하나쯤은 있겠지만 그래도 꼭. 임용식 끝나고 어떤 젊은 20대 남자분이 대리러옴 그후 인사시키고 팀장으로 보이는 어떤 틀딱아재가 신입이여 ㅇㅈㄹ 하다 30분동안 호구조사당함 갑자기 남는자리가 없다면서 자리만들어주겠다고 지하에서 책상 의자 가져오. 공기업인데 여자없음 같이 일하는 사람 남자들밖에 없음나이대는 주로 3040대 50대도 있고, 여지껏 공장밖에 다녀본적이 없어서 제대로된 직장은 사실상 첨인데 텃세같은거 있나.

편의상 반말로 쓰겠습니다 글이 길어질텐데 필요한 부분만 읽으셔도 됩니다1.. 씨발 군대 전역하자마자 돈 벌어야돼서 적당한 중소 회사에 입사하고 오늘 첫 출근이었는데 출근이 오전 9시여서 8시 20분에 도착했단말야 도착했는데 아무도 없음 8시 50분 되니까 그제서야 한명 오더라 나보고 누구세요..

좋아요 207개,재미있는 @user7316 님의 Tiktok 틱톡 동영상 신입사원 신혜의 첫 출근과 예상치 못한 사건들.

신입사원 첫 출근 매뉴얼 알려준다 사회 초년생 필독.

Net › Square › 1383898815더쿠 펌 신입사원 첫 출근 매뉴얼 알려준다 사회 초년생 필독.

첫날부터 바리바리 싸들고 갈 필요는 없다. 목이 말라 물을 마시러 들어갔는데 마침 공간이 더러워서 치운다. 이번 글에서는 신입사원이 첫 출근을 앞두고 알아두면 좋은 10가지 꿀팁을 총정리해 보겠습니다. 22 232257 삭제 글쓴 중갤러211. Redirecting to sgall, 뉴비필독첫출근 복장은 이렇게만 해라 공무원 합격자 미니.

저도 지금은 후회하지만 첫 출근때 더 관심가지고 했더라면 더 성장하였을텐데 아쉽더라구요.. 그러니 쫄지말고 걍 열심히 하자고 다짐하셈.. 목요일 아침에 첫 출근하자마자 인사 순회 한바퀴 그리고 두꺼운 책 3권 주시면서 공부하고 있으라함 다른 사람들은 존나 바쁘게 일하는데 본인만.. 공기업인데 여자없음 같이 일하는 사람 남자들밖에 없음나이대는 주로 3040대 50대도 있고, 여지껏 공장밖에 다녀본적이 없어서 제대로된 직장은 사실상 첨인데 텃세같은거 있나..

정보 펌 신입사원 첫 출근 매뉴얼 알려준다 사회 초년생 필독.

컴퓨터 세팅하고, 보안 프로그램 설치하고, 회사 계정 등록하고 나면 하루가 거의 끝난다. Redirecting to sgall. 업무가 다양하게 많고 중간업무자가 다 나가고 신입 5명이나 한번에 들어와서 하나하나 갈킬시간없어서 제일 나이많은 나한태 그러는거 같기도 하고 모르겟다 대놓고 말하는건 업무 못따라 온다는거니까. 우선 첫 출근하시게된 것 축하드립니다 무난한 것은 블라우스or 셔츠에 슬렉스 식으로 단정한 옷을 입는 것입니다.

신입사원 첫 출근 매뉴얼 알려준다 사회 초년생 필독. 아주 오래된 나의 첫 출근을 회상해 봐도, 요즘 누군가의 첫 출근과 다르지 않다, Com › board › programming바람직한 신입 개발자 첫출근 가이드 프로그래밍 갤러리.

그때 그냥 한다고 하고 지금은 일단 집에가라. 회사의 분위기와 문화에 맞춰 적절한 복장을 선택하는 것이 중요합니다. 저도 지금은 후회하지만 첫 출근때 더 관심가지고 했더라면 더 성장하였을텐데 아쉽더라구요. 편의상 반말로 쓰겠습니다 글이 길어질텐데 필요한 부분만 읽으셔도 됩니다1. Com › board › view싱글벙글 첫 출근 컴퓨터에 카톡 설치하는 신입사원 실시간 베스트.

miss av korea 이번 글에서는 신입사원이 첫 출근을 앞두고 알아두면 좋은 10가지 꿀팁을 총정리해 보겠습니다. 상사가 야근하기 좋아하거나 시키는 거 좋아하면 아마 말이 나올것임. Com › board › view첫 출근 너무 어려워하지 마라. 년 하반기 삼성sds 신입사원 합격 이후, svp 삼성그룹 공채 2주 교육까지 끝내고 드디어 출근을 했습니다. 스레드에 올라온 어느 글 신입사원이 첫 출근 하자마자 pc카톡 먼저 설치한 걸 보고 내보낼까 고민중이라 한다. miruchuru

mosquitoman hitomila 는 앞으로도 여러분이 멋진 직장인으로 거듭날 수 있도록 ‘쌩신입 완벽 적응 가이드’ 시리즈 로 계속 찾아올게요. 많이 들려오는만큼, 출근 빨리하고 인사 잘하고 군대 이등병마냥 메모하면서 대답만 잘해도 이쁨까진 몰라도 키울만하다는 평가는 받을거임. 는 앞으로도 여러분이 멋진 직장인으로 거듭날 수 있도록 ‘쌩신입 완벽 적응 가이드’ 시리즈 로 계속 찾아올게요. 상사가 야근하기 좋아하거나 시키는 거 좋아하면 아마 말이 나올것임. 이번 글에서는 신입사원이 첫 출근을 앞두고 알아두면 좋은 10가지 꿀팁을 총정리해 보겠습니다. mignon hitomi

myfans pikpak ko Com › board › view싱글벙글 첫 출근 컴퓨터에 카톡 설치하는 신입사원 실시간 베스트. 취업에 성공한 당신 이제 준비물 챙길 시간이다. Redirecting to sgall. 첫 출근은 누구에게나 긴장되고 설레는 순간입니다. 이사님만 혼자 계심 인사드리고 대충 이야기 나누고 앉아서 멀뚱멀뚱. mrsddirori onlyfans

mitsuki 디시 이사님만 혼자 계심 인사드리고 대충 이야기 나누고 앉아서 멀뚱멀뚱. 저도 지금은 후회하지만 첫 출근때 더 관심가지고 했더라면 더 성장하였을텐데 아쉽더라구요. 선생님들도 첫 출근때 두렵고 무섭고 이러셨나요. 아주 오래된 나의 첫 출근을 회상해 봐도, 요즘 누군가의 첫 출근과 다르지 않다. 호출벨을 눌러서 xx부서로 오늘부터 출근하기로한 신입 누구누구라고 말씀드리면 될 듯 합니다.

monsnode.cok 첫날부터 바리바리 싸들고 갈 필요는 없다. 좋아요 207개,재미있는 @user7316 님의 tiktok 틱톡 동영상 신입사원 신혜의 첫 출근과 예상치 못한 사건들. 첫 출근은 누구에게나 긴장되고 설레는 순간입니다. Com › board › programming바람직한 신입 개발자 첫출근 가이드 프로그래밍 갤러리. 저는 포트폴리오를 만드는 훈련교사이다 보니 첫 취업이거나 사회생활경험이 적은 친구들에게 이런저런 이야기를 하는 편이에요.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.