Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

Yi yoon ha and kim yun jae from my sibling’s romance are getting married. 韓國知名戀愛綜藝節目《戀愛兄妹》的「雙允cp」李允荷（이윤하）與金允載（김윤재）不只在節目上甜蜜互動，還開youtube頻道透露結婚計畫，沒想到如今傳來 read more. 841 likes, tiktok video from 𝑴𝒊𝒍𝒂 @m1las_ed1ts4 discover the mesmerizing collaboration of yoon cheong ah and ha yi chan, brought to life in a unique overlay. For a drama that got a lot of love for being refreshing it’s sad to see the narrative turns towards nonsensical reactions and continue reading →.

히토미 Cg

Hi experience consulate general of the republic of korea in sydney education 삼육대학교 location south korea 1 connection on linkedin. View yoon ha yi’s profile on linkedin, a professional community of 1 billion members, 《戀愛兄妹》允荷、允載宣布結婚🎉 更多韓過戀綜牽手cp. 120k followers, 220 following, 51 posts 이윤하 @yiiyoonha on instagram 𝄢 𝐶𝑒𝑙𝑙𝑖𝑠𝑡 hayoonhayi@gmail. Follow their romantic. Com › yiiyoonha이윤하@yiiyoonha instagram stories and photos download.

Yi yoon ha and kim yun jae from my sibling’s romance are getting married, （封面图源：ig@rladbswo3、ig@yiiyoonha） 因恋爱综艺《恋爱兄妹》而结缘并宣布结婚的金允在、李允荷，在近日宣布分手。 （图源：jtbc《恋爱兄妹》） 27日，李允荷在 ig 上写道：「节目播出后，虽然也在大家的关心中培养了爱情，但最终还是决定各走各的路。. Last year, the couple from the hit dating show announced that they were engaged and planning to get married in early 2025, The engaged couple surprised fans as they decided to call off their wedding and go their separate ways, 韓國知名戀愛綜藝節目《戀愛兄妹》的「雙允cp」李允荷（이윤하）與金允載（김윤재）不只在節目上甜蜜互動，還開youtube頻道透露結婚計畫，沒想到如今傳來 read more. In 2019, he began his acting career by leading in the web drama realtimelove.

Yi yoon ha and kim yun jae from my siblings romance are getting married. Joohweylees profile picture. Tv on ma ️yi yoon ha and kim yun jae from my sibling’s romance have officially ended their relationship, Actor yoon jin made a bombshell speech in front of actor park hana, who is about to get married, Personnalité yi yoon ha violoncelliste, personnalité de télévision, violoncelliste.

Découvrez sa biographie, sa carrière en détail et toute son actualité. 因戀愛綜藝《戀愛兄妹》而結緣並宣佈結婚的金允在、李允荷，在近日宣佈分手。 27日，李允荷在ig 上寫道：「節目播出後，雖然也在大家的關心中. Kdrama twinkling watermelon viewers feel robbed after seeing still cuts from a deleted scene, starring choi hyun wook and shin eun soo, Yiiyoonha i love you in the next life.

Personnalité yi yoon ha violoncelliste, personnalité de télévision, violoncelliste, He taught that consistency is the key my siblings romance. Sitemap about us terms of use privacy policy cookie policy copyright policy advertisement info site guidelines help center jobs privacy manager privacy manager, Com › yiiyoonha이윤하@yiiyoonha instagram stories and photos download, 143k followers, 141 following, 42 posts 이윤하 @yiiyoonha on instagram 첼리스트. Mereka yang terlibat cinta lokasi dalam reality show my sibling’s romance tersebut baru saja mengumumkan akan segera menggelar pernikahan pada awal tahun 2025 mendatang.

히든페이스 영화 보기

Couple to exchange vows in 2025.. 韓國知名戀愛綜藝節目《戀愛兄妹》的「雙允cp」 李允荷 （이윤하）與金允載（김윤재）不只在節目上甜蜜互動，還開youtube頻道透露結婚計畫，沒想到如今傳來分手消息，讓許多粉絲震驚。 雙允cp在《戀愛兄妹》甜蜜互動羨煞不少螢幕前的觀眾，甜度超高，節目結束後兩人在去年8月開設youtube頻道「윤윤튜브 yoonhayunjae..

Com › yiiyoonha이윤하 @yiiyoonha instagram photos and videos. 允荷、允載在2024年6月結束播出的jtbc《戀愛兄妹》中發展成情侶，並於8月開設youtube頻道，公開計劃於隔年初步入婚姻，當時獲得大量祝福。 然而，雖然當時表示將透過影片分享籌備婚禮的過程，但除了首支影片之外，之後便未再上傳任何內容，社群媒體上也看不到彼此的互動，引發過一波分手疑雲。. 녀 열심히 밤낮없이 작업중입니다 she is working hard day and night, Fans were left disappointed after hearing that south korean couple yi yoonha and kim yunjae have officially ended their relationship. 《戀愛兄妹》允荷、允載宣布結婚🎉 更多韓過戀綜牽手cp.

후쿠다 유아 품번

其中在6月大結局配對成功、變為線下真實情侶的 允荷 、允載 兩人，昨晚突然宣布好消息，他們即將在明年年初結婚 啦！ 「允允cp」也特地開設了youtube頻道 read more. Hi experience consulate general of the republic of korea in sydney education 삼육대학교 location south korea 1 connection on linkedin. Joohweylees profile picture, Pada tanggal 25 agustus, pasangan dari acara kencan populer tersebut meluncurkan saluran youtube baru mereka sendiri.

히메노 가슴 디시 Fans were left disappointed after hearing that south korean couple yi yoonha and kim yunjae have officially ended their relationship. Istoooshort 넹 아직 더워요. Kim yun jae berkomentar, kami bahagia bertemu satu sama lain, jadi untuk bertemu satu sama. 3k followers, 213 following, 47 posts. My siblings romance commentary 240621. 환연 마이너

환승 연애4 미니 갤러리 Choi hyunwook korean 최현욱. Follow their romantic. 10 첼리스트 이윤하 첼리스트 이윤하는, 소리를 언어 삼아 세상과 연결되고, 책에서 용기를 얻어 다시 무대에 서는 사람이었습니다. On august 25, the couple from the hit dating show launched a brandnew yout. Ch_amiis profile picture. 히어하트 asmr

히가시히로시마 풍속 Couple to exchange vows in 2025. Yiiyoonhas profile picture yiiyoonha. 추영우 전성시대 the heyday of choo youngwoo. Profil éducations korea national u. 이윤하 @yiiyoonha instagram photos and videos. 히나타갤

환승연애 시즌4 미니갤 Com › @m1las_ed1ts4 › videoyoon cheong ah and ha yi chan the daze collaboration tiktok. Mereka yang terlibat cinta lokasi dalam reality show my sibling’s romance tersebut baru saja mengumumkan akan segera menggelar pernikahan pada awal tahun 2025 mendatang. 韓國知名戀愛綜藝節目《戀愛兄妹》的「雙允cp」李允荷（이윤하）與金允載（김윤재）不只在節目上甜蜜互動，還開youtube頻道透露結婚計畫，沒想到如今傳來 read more. View yoon ha yi’s profile on linkedin, a professional community of 1 billion members. Actress confidential assignment.

히토미 루키아 The couple from my sibling’s romance, yi yoon ha and kim yun jae, officially announce their breakup, releasing statements explaining their decision to call off their engagement. However, both yi yoon ha and kim yun jae shared through statements on their personal instagram accounts that the. View yoon ha yi’s profile on linkedin, a professional community of 1 billion members. Yoon soyi korean 윤소이. 120k followers, 220 following, 51 posts 이윤하 @yiiyoonha on instagram 𝄢 𝐶𝑒𝑙𝑙𝑖𝑠𝑡 hayoonhayi@gmail.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.