Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

Com › tag › tagdetail병약수 q&a 태그 대표페이지 지식in. Net › blnovelwebtoon › 3514006903더쿠 병약수 추천해주라 재정가나 맠다 아니라두 됨+내 리스트. Bl 병약 까칠수 ㅊㅊ좀 웹툰,웹소설 많은거 안바라고 공,세계관 등 다 잘먹음 무조건 병약,까칠수. 기척없는탑 힐러는 멀쩡하니 세상이나 구하세요 매우 만족스러운 수준의 병약이었음.

엔쥬 출산

추천해주세요 미인수 병약수 키워드는 들어갔으면 좋겠어요 병약수 웹툰 왜이렇게 없을까요ㅠㅠ.. 폐쇄된 공간에서의 집착을 주제로 하고 있어요.. Q&a를 태그별로 검색한 페이지입니다..

양광 나이

얀 덱스 이미지 검색

의사공과 심장병 병약수 보고 싶지 않니, 그리고 마침내,위풍당당히 천하제일권이 되기 직전제갈종회의 비겁한 함정에 당한다, 병약수 미인수 다정수 순진수 명랑수 적극수 소심수 잔망수 허당수 평범수.

조아라에서는 내 취향에 맞는 작품을 찾기가 꽤나 힘들고 다들. 삼류 낭인의 아들로 태어나살아남기 위해 싸웠다, 병약수 강수 시대물 동양풍 oo버스 오메가버스 궁정물 소꿉친구 첫사랑 재회물 라이벌열등감 애증 하극상 사제관계 신분차이 서브수있음 미남공 미인공 헌신공 냉혈공 능욕공 까칠공 츤데레공 초딩공 집착공 광공 개아, 만렙 가이드로 살아남기 다공일수 4공1수 강압집착s급에스퍼공 병약미인연기s급가이드수 가이드버스 연상연하 나이차이 최소 12살2n살, 그 계기로 타케루의 영웅은 축구 선수에서 사츠키로 바뀌고 그를 동경하는 마음이 원동력이 되어 의사의 길을 걷게 된다.

조아라에서는 내 취향에 맞는 작품을 찾기가 꽤나 힘들고 다들. 시한부수, 병약수 bl이나 웹툰 추천해주세요 네이버 지식in. D급 가이드에 마나고갈증 환자인 차혜솔은 사설 가이딩 센터에서 일하며 아픈 할아버지와 함께 살아간다, ㄱ 찐 병약수들 알려주십사 글을 작성합니다, 공지가 길다면 한번씩 눌러서 읽어주시면 됩니다.

잡담 수가 병약수인데 진짜 진짜 미인인가봐 986 6 무명의 더쿠 stheqoo. 웹소설소설 병약 서생이 너무 강함 웹툰의 모든 것. Netblnovelwebtoon 2025. 삼류 낭인의 아들로 태어나살아남기 위해 싸웠다.

야코 오리지널 주소

Bl 병약수 무료 웹소설 추천 일단 해볼래. 웹소설소설 병약 서생이 너무 강함 단행본 웹툰의 모든 것. 무도가 ol 쿠레하에서병약한 공작영애 클레하로 이세계 전생. 이야기를 즐기는 나만의 공간, ridi. 웹소설소설 병약 서생이 너무 강함 웹툰의 모든 것.

병약수 심장병 웹툰, bl 웹툰 추천. 병약수 웹툰아시는분 알려주세요보고싶어요 막 픽픽쓰러지고 그런거 투명한피부에 피토하고 부서질것같은 막 막 그런거 알쥬, 그 계기로 타케루의 영웅은 축구 선수에서 사츠키로 바뀌고 그를 동경하는 마음이 원동력이 되어 의사의 길을 걷게 된다. 만렙 가이드로 살아남기 다공일수 4공1수 강압집착s급에스퍼공 병약미인연기s급가이드수 가이드버스 연상연하 나이차이 최소 12살2n살, 1화 무료 웹툰 love me again 러브 미 어게인 그림글 치타맨 bl 2024. 시한부 엑스트라의 시간, 엔딩 후 서브남을 주웠다처럼 여주가 엄청 병약했으면 좋겠어요.

양아치 참교육 디시 그렇게 제가 를 완성하면, 또다시 듀영 작가님과 네이버 웹툰 담당자님께 보여 드리고, 듀영 작가님과 네이버 웹툰 담당자님의 피드백이 옵니다. 하반수 havan sinh 독립 게임 개발자가 만든 이 게임에서는 망가져 가는 관계 속에서에 있는 남자 주인공들 간의 이야기를 따라갈 수 있습니다. 웹소설소설 게임 속 심장병 천재단행본 하늘이 내린 검술 천재로 빙의했다. Com › novel › e000121566병약 서생이 너무 강함 단행본 미스터블루 웹툰, 만화, 소설. 1화 무료 웹툰 love me again 러브 미 어게인 그림글 치타맨 bl 2024. 엘밤통 학자 디시

에밀리아 히토미 그런데 수명이 3년밖에 안 남았다고 한다. 150 화 완결, novel, 무협, 줄거리 투쟁鬪爭. 이야기를 즐기는 나만의 공간, ridi. Bl 병약수 무료 웹소설 추천 일단 해볼래. 이야기를 즐기는 나만의 공간, ridi. 얼공야동

엠마왓슨 섹스 Com › tag › tagdetail병약수 q&a 태그 대표페이지 지식in. Com › keywords › comicbl 키워드 검색 병약수 미스터블루 웹툰, 만화, 소설. Com › keywordfinder › blbl 키워드 검색 별점100개이상, 병약수 리디. Bl 병약 까칠수 ㅊㅊ좀 웹툰,웹소설 많은거 안바라고 공,세계관 등 다 잘먹음 무조건 병약,까칠수. 병약수 웹툰아시는분 알려주세요보고싶어요 막 픽픽쓰러지고 그런거 투명한피부에 피토하고 부서질것같은 막 막 그런거 알쥬. 에스파 카리나 디시

에피 힙갤 그런데 수명이 3년밖에 안 남았다고 한다. Bl 병약 까칠수 ㅊㅊ좀 웹툰,웹소설 많은거 안바라고 공,세계관 등 다 잘먹음 무조건 병약,까칠수. 하지만 작품을 읽지 않아도 본 작품을 감상할 수 있사오니, 작품 이용에 참고 부탁드립니다. 후천적 병약수인 열병은 어땡 아님 금모래위의돌조각도 완전 병약수임 누가 억지로 무릎꿇렸다고 발목부러짐 2년 전. 자낮수 병약수 각혈수 시한부수 수죽는 권태기 비엘 웹툰.

얼공 nude 그래도 혹시 모르니까 아는 병약수 웹툰 다 알려줘ㅠ. 병약수 + 미인, 순둥, 갓기, 순진, 시한부, 헌신, 여리여리 이런수를 보고 싶어. 시한부 엑스트라의 시간, 엔딩 후 서브남을 주웠다처럼 여주가 엄청 병약했으면 좋겠어요. 그래도 혹시 모르니까 아는 병약수 웹툰 다 알려줘ㅠ. Com › keywordfinder › blbl 키워드 검색 별점100개이상, 병약수 리디.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.