Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

See photos and videos from friends on instagram, and discover other accounts youll love. 이케짱 いけちゃん ikechan 네이버 블로그 idol. Com › 2925erowns words & works いけちゃん 이케짱. 개중에는 단순히 장난 read more.

Tori_page Onlyfans Leak

Follow ikechanfd in the app to see their photos and videos.. Com › jooin97 › 223026973336ikechan 이케짱 young jump 2022 no..

하지만 그럴 때마다 옆에서, 작고 신비스런 친구 이케짱이 말동무가 되어. 미노와 고스케 이케짱 불륜 아내는 충격 데빌소울 티스토리. 유튜버하면서 그라비아도하고이번에 1급건축설계사 합격했더라. 개중에는 단순히 장난 read more, 언제부턴가 나에게만 보이는 신기한 이케짱.

Ts Guigui

みなさん こんばんは、k짱です。미나상 곰방와 k짱데스 여러분 안녕하세요, k짱입니다. 이케짱과 나いけちゃんとぼく, good bye, my secret friend, Com 이케짱 いけちゃん ikechan グラビア 그라비아아이돌 그라비아 gravure gravureidol 화보 댓글. 심사위원 각자가 각자의 책임으로 멤버를 뽑는. 개중에는 단순히 장난 read more, いけちゃん ikechan 1人で楽しく生きてる 旅行とグルメと建築と。 前のチャンネル名は「ぼっち女子大生 いけちゃん」.

2022년 1월 12일 개최된 제4회 대회 에서는 아쉽게 2위를 기록했다. いけちゃん @ikechan0920 instagram 사진 및 동영상 팔로워 163k명, 팔로잉 462명, 게시물 1,031개 いけちゃん @ikechan0920님의 instagram 사진 및 동영상 보기. 개구쟁이지만 착하고 정도 많은 주인공 소년은 항상 마을, 이케짱과 나 작품소개 주인공 소년이 어리광만 부렸던 철없는 어린 시절을 지나, 어른으로 성장해 나가는 과정을 이케짱이라는 신비한 작은 친구의 시점으로 묘사한, 아름다운 서정시와 같은 동화다.

Tumbex Korea

Com › sousio › 222927301143일본 그라비아 모델 이케짱 いけちゃん ikechan 네이버 블로그. View the profiles of people named 이케짱. Com › 2925erowns words & works いけちゃん 이케짱.

화 완결, comic, 드라마, 줄거리 주인공 소년이 어리광만 부렸던 철없는 어린 시절을 지나, 어른으로 성장해 나가는 과정을 이케짱이라는 신비한 작은 친구의 시점으로 묘사한, 아름다운 서정시와 같은 동화다.. 45만 유튜버 그라비아 모델 이케짱 いけちゃん ikechan flash 2023.. 이케짱과 나いけちゃんとぼく, good bye, my secret friend.. 黄色がすき、申し訳ない、もうしょうがない バガリア贔屓..

Su페리

이케짱 이즈미소토아사히카와오뎅 tabelog, Com › 1385いけちゃん 이케짱 friday 비밀의 시간 화보, Nct wish community post 이케이케남자 ryo. Followers, 126 following, 5 posts いけちゃんぐ이케짱 @ikechansecret on instagram. 25 いけちゃん 「あざとさ全開sexy」.

ts 트위터 25 짤방 이케짱 いけちゃん 일본 유튜버 주간 플레이보이 weekly playboy 週刊プレイボーイ 週プレ 남성용 주간 잡지 no. 드라마 xxx holic 일본wowow 과 잘 먹었습니다 nhk에 부부 역으로 함께 출연한 안 과 열애설과 불화설이 있었다. Shop 잡지 기타 friday friday 2025年 12月 5日 いけちゃん 프라이데이 2025년 12월 5일 이케짱 확대 축소 50% 100% 150% 200%. 언제부턴가 나에게만 보이는 신기한 이케짱. 이케짱 いけちゃん ikechan グラビア 그라비아아이돌 그라비아 gravure gravureidol. toka akari anal

superpangtv 2020년 12월 1일 개최된 제3회 akb48 그룹 가창력 no. Followers 162 following 5 posts @ikechansecret. 17 그녀의 올바른 아름다움 화보입니다. 미리보기는 여기까지 다음 이야기가 궁금하신가요. 이 항목에 서술되어 있듯 케인은 2007년 인터넷 방송을 처음 시작했을 당시에는 장난전화를 메인 컨셉으로 잡은 전형적인 막장 스트리머였다. stripchat tokens github

thisvid 업스 주인공 소년이 어리광만 부렸던 철없는 어린 시절을 지나, 어른으로 성장해 나가는 과정을 이케짱이라는 신비한 작은 친구의 시점으로 묘사한, 아름다운 서정시와. Post by いけちゃん、이케짱🍬 on x w. 개구쟁이지만 착하고 정도 많은 주인공 소년은 항상 마을 친구들에게 괴롭힘을 당한다. Com › board › view이케짱 다시 활동재개했네 ㄷㄷㄷㄷㄷ 일본 연예 갤러리. 2019년 12월 3일에 stu48 2기생으로 공개되었다. t me 알플

ssbbw game 黄色がすき、申し訳ない、もうしょうがない バガリア贔屓. 1998년 데뷔를 해서 같은해 첫 중상 승리를 한후 02년에 첫 g1 승리를 거머쥔 이케조에 켄이치,2003년, g1 1승의 젊은 햇병아리. 2022년 1월 12일 개최된 제4회 대회 에서는 아쉽게 2위를 기록했다. Com › 2925erowns words & works いけちゃん 이케짱. 25 짤방 이케짱 いけちゃん 일본 유튜버 주간 플레이보이 weekly playboy 週刊プレイボーイ 週プレ 남성용 주간 잡지 no.

stuckclipss 아버지가 돌아가셨을때도, 친구들에게 괴롭힘을 당할때도 항상 옆에 있어주었다. 화 완결, comic, 드라마, 줄거리 주인공 소년이 어리광만 부렸던 철없는 어린 시절을 지나, 어른으로 성장해 나가는 과정을 이케짱이라는 신비한 작은 친구의 시점으로 묘사한, 아름다운 서정시와 같은 동화다. 주인공 소년이 어리광만 부렸던 철없는 어린 시절을 지나, 어른으로 성장해 나가는 과정을 이케짱이라는 신비한 작은 친구의 시점으로 묘사한. 그라비아 모델 いけちゃん 이케짱의 friday 2023. 안과 열애설과 불화설이 있었는데, 열애설이 압도적으로 많았다.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.