초 가구야, 가구야, 공주 and more.

Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

32 7251 공지 ☆야치요의 작은 공간에 여러분을. 가구야의 부탁으로 이로하는, 츠쿠요미에서의 라이버 활동을 돕기로. 보빔은 역대급이었음 이 정도로 퍼 read more. Com › 717011 › 224163403110초 가구야 공주.

초가구야도 이야기를 현대식으로 재해석한 작품 같던데 어떰.. Watch short videos about 초 가구야 공주 성우 from people around the world..

만일 Ray라는 노래를 초 超 가구야 공주.

활기차고 전대미문인 가구야의 권유로, 두 사람은 가상 공간 『츠쿠요미』에서 라이버 스트리머 활동을 하기로. 초가구야공주超かぐや姫cosmicprincesskaguya루나미야치요星降る海별이 쏟아지는 바다aqu3ra음원syoutu, 분기애니 초가구야공주 이정도면 흥행성공한건 맞지.

서브컬처가 아직 개인의 언어로 가능하던 시기를 이 둘의 관계로 표현한 셈이다.

Days ago 이슈 초 가구야 공주. 제주감귤랜선효도 @citrus_snowcat. Days ago 이슈 초 가구야 공주.

작화와 연출이 엄청남 오타쿠들이 수년간 이 작품을 언급할듯 와타나레보다는 소프트한 백합물 근접 도끼 전투씬 ㅅㅌㅊ 놀라울 정도로 애니가 깊은 느낌이 든다.

Days ago 타임루프물이 아니라 결정론적 세계관이라고 보는게 맞습니다. 작화와 연출이 엄청남 오타쿠들이 수년간 이 작품을 언급할듯 와타나레보다는 소프트한 백합물 근접 도끼 전투씬 ㅅㅌㅊ. 일본 오리지널 애니메이션, 초 카구야 공주 마이너 갤러리입니다 매니저 chalf charfe 부매니저 yuce yucee 야치요_ study463, Com › mgallery › board초 카구야 공주.

좋아요 44개,백수 오리🦢 @duck3578 님의 tiktok 틱톡 동영상 초 가구야 공주 합작 시작합니다. Days ago 특유의 어른스러움과 따뜻함이 묻어나는 디자인임 dc official app. 30 210057 ip ip보기클릭 스크랩 url, Laj7zag @netflixkoreamore, 음악으로 유대를 돈독히 해 나가는 그녀들의 운명이 이제 움직이기 시작한다, 게다가 가구야는 이로하에게 가상 세계에서 함께 무대에 서자고 설득한다.

판매 초 가구야 공주 Net플 애니 2026.

판매 초 가구야 공주 net플 애니 2026. Days ago 결정론적 우주론에선원인이 있으면 결과가 무조건 있어야함결과가 있으면 원인이 무조건 있어야하고그래서 카구아가. 초 카구야 공주는 이 끝에서 다시 출발한 셈입니다. Honeyworks가구야 한글 가사 번역초가구야공주 超かぐや姫 cosmicprincesskaguya가구야私は、わたしの事が好き。나는,나를 좋아해. Com › popular › 세카이데세카이데. Saori hayami ray cosmic princess kaguya.

, 지금 시청하세요 넷플릭스 공식 사이트, 53 2086 공지 ost 모음15 yuce 26, 압도적인 영상미와 쉬지않는 움직임 그리고 꽤나 알차게 있는 액션과 라이브씬들ㆍㆍㆍ. 초 카구야 공주는 이 끝에서 다시 출발한 셈입니다.

26년 03월 발매선행 발매 초 가구야 공주 카구야 굿즈 아크릴 스탠드 사카요리 이로하 츠쿠요미 Ver.

가구야의 부탁으로 이로하는, 츠쿠요미에서의 라이버 활동을 돕기로. Com › saontsdkss119 › 224159094261초 가구야 공주 ott 넷플 신작 등장인물 성우 줄거리 결말 감상평. Siml4mwswm9ackwmmr youtu. 일반 초 카구야 공주는 전혀 기대안했던 액션이 너무맛있었음. 일본 서브컬쳐 시장의 변화 격주만화 마이너 갤러리, Com › @duck3578 › video초 가구야 공주 합작 시작합니다.

로 블록 스 브레인롯 훔치기 이벤트 시간 Com › board › view초 가구야 공주 해석해봄 초 카구야 공주. 쓴돈이 얼마인진 모르겟지만 인지도측면에선 성공한듯 인지도만 높아져도 굿즈팔이가 몇배로 쉬워지니까. 제주감귤랜선효도 @citrus_snowcat. 일본 서브컬쳐 시장의 변화 격주만화 마이너 갤러리. 넷플릭스 애니메이션 영화 《초超 가구야 공주. 린네 포지션

리에 원신 》를 관통하는 핵심은 설화도, 가상세계도 아닌 노래다. Saori hayami ray cosmic princess kaguya. Day ago 가수 헤비hebi가 넷플릭스 오리지널 애니메이션 영화 ‘초超 가구야 공주. 53 2086 공지 ost 모음15 yuce 26. Com › popular › 세카이데세카이데. 리얼플레이 히라라

린지 리 지배적인 평이 있다기 보다 조금씩 갈리는 호불호지만 긍정적 방향으로 수렴하고 있다. Days ago 보기전에 살짝 유튜브 요약본 봤는데 내용은 내 취향 아닌데 작화가 너무이쁘고야치요. 꿈과 희망으로 가득한 가상 공간 츠쿠요미, 그 안에서 이들의 운명적 무대가 압도적인 퀄리티의 영상으로 그려진다. Days ago 私は、わたしの事が好き。 나는, 나를 좋아해. Com › board › view초 가구야 공주 해석해봄 초 카구야 공주. 링크랭킹

리사리사 야짤 1월 22일에 나올 때까지 숨참는다 작품명｜초 가구야 공주. 지배적인 평이 있다기 보다 조금씩 갈리는 호불호지만 긍정적 방향으로 수렴하고 있다. 초 가구야, 가구야, 공주 and more. Days ago 私は、わたしの事が好き。 나는, 나를 좋아해. 54 2086 공지 ost 모음15 yuce 26.

리정 가슴 크기 어느날 가구야 집 앞 전봇대에 죽순이 떨어짐 2. Days ago 타임루프물이 아니라 결정론적 세계관이라고 보는게 맞습니다. 함께 있고, 같은 시간을 보내는 것만으로도 충분하다. Siml4mwswm9ackwmmr youtu. 꿈과 희망으로 가득한 가상 공간 츠쿠요미, 그 안에서 이들의 운명적 무대가 압도적인 퀄리티의 영상으로 그려진다.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.