Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

Com › fortune › 17060出会い系詐欺サイト・サクラサイト晒します！｜騙され女の逆襲. 今回の悪質占い詐欺サイトは株式会社リンクが運営する「mother（マザー）」です。 青山北町法律事務所は、占いサイトで騙されたお金の返金を得意としてい. コンディション記載と著しく違う際は返金・交換対応いたしますのでご連絡ください。 米国でタロット占いの母と呼ばれていた故イーデン・グレイの幻の3部作と言われている. ①占いって返金してもらえるの？ 実際のところ、占いは返金が難しい商材です。 占いサイトには利用規約が設けられており、その中に「鑑定内容に対して責任を負わない」と書かれていることがほとんど。.

아이돌 섹터뷰 디시

아프리카 M3u8 디시

아이코스매장고양

占い詐欺サイトと返金交渉をするには、証拠があるかどうかが重要なポイントになります。 悪徳業者が返金に応じるかどうかは、裁判所に証拠を提出して、不法行為だと認めてもらえる可能性があるかどうかがカギとなります。.. Com › uranai › 7004株式会社リンクのmother マザーはメール占い詐欺？返金方法まで解説..

当初、占いサイトの運営会社はなかなか交渉に応じませんでしたが、決済に関わっている業者等にも協力してもらい、約330万円を返金してもらうことが出来ました。 bさん 40代男性. 占い詐欺返金請求における判例の意義 占い詐欺裁判：判例で争点となる主なポイント 判例に学ぶ占い詐欺で返金が認められやすいケース・認められにくいケース（傾向） 返金が認められやすいケース（傾向） 返金が認められにくいケース（傾向）, 悪質な占いサイト・占いアプリはこのような手口を使って辞められない状況に追い込んできます。 少しでも心当たりがあれば返金される可能性がありますので. コンディション記載と著しく違う際は返金・交換対応いたしますのでご連絡ください。 米国でタロット占いの母と呼ばれていた故イーデン・グレイの幻の3部作と言われている, Com › uranai › 7004株式会社リンクのmother マザーはメール占い詐欺？返金方法まで解説. Jp › henkin › iranaisagi_refundablecases占い詐欺で返金される場合はどんなとき？返金方法を判例付きで弁護士.

아이온2 윈터 커마 공유

Com › column › detail占いは返金してもらえる？可能性を高めるポイント3つと具体的な方法, Mother マザーは占い詐欺をしている可能性がありそうです。 「大金を得られるのは今だけ」という根拠のない期待を抱かせて、鑑定へと誘っている可能性があります。 motherの口コミや退会方法も載せています。. この記事では、占い詐欺の手口や、返金される条件、実際の判例をもとに解説します。 十分な証拠が揃っていれば返金の可能性も！ 弁護士に相談するメリットや、返金請求の流れについても詳しく説明します。.

아카캉 팬티노출 コンディション記載と著しく違う際は返金・交換対応いたしますのでご連絡ください。 米国でタロット占いの母と呼ばれていた故イーデン・グレイの幻の3部作と言われている. サイキック・ラブ・リーディング：同じ時間 彼の気持ちと意図. Jp › media › scam占い詐欺返金諦めないで！被害金を取り戻す方法と可能性を弁護士. Com › fortune › 17060出会い系詐欺サイト・サクラサイト晒します！｜騙され女の逆襲. 株式会社リンクが運営し、鑑定が終わらないという恐怖にお金を吸い取られてしまうのです。 安全なのか、危険なのか、motherの鑑定が終わるのか、課金はどれだけ続くのか、そんな疑問に応えます。. 아씨 누구지

아이돌리즘갤 占いサイトや情報商材の高額請求に関する返金交渉を専門とし、年間200件以上の相談に対応。 依頼者の心のケアを第一に考えながら、法律に基づいた冷静な交渉で8割以上の案件を返金（一部返金含む）に導いてきた実績を持つ。. ここで、当時私が各占いサイトで支払った金額を実際のサイト名とともにお伝えいたします。 coral：81,000円. 契約取り消しや返金請求、クレジットカードの支払い停止などに対応 占い詐欺、霊感商法などお任せください。代表弁護士が対応 料金表を. ここで、当時私が各占いサイトで支払った金額を実際のサイト名とともにお伝えいたします。 coral：81,000円. ビデオや物理的なアイテムは送信されません。 18歳以上限定。 返金不可 すべてのリーディングは、あなたのために個人的に、精神的に行われます。 倫理的境界 法律、健康. 아이우에옷토

아이코스 고속 충전기 디시 Com › mirai2あなたも返金できる！占い詐欺「mirai～本格診断～」の返金成功率を劇. 似たような悪質占いサイトがあったらlineやtwitter mother（マザー） 青山北町法律事務所は、占いサイトで騙されたお金の返金を得意としています。. 占い詐欺の返金請求をする法律事務所は、『相談料無料』『着手金無料』『成功報酬のみ』が一般的です。 当事務所も、相談料無料、着手金無料となっており. （なお、払ったお金は弁護士に相談することで返金される可能性があります！） この記事では、元利用者から寄せられた口コミをも. お使いの占いサイト本当に大丈夫ですか？ 占いサイトで詐欺被害にあった場合、 法的に交渉できるのは弁護士だけ です。 実際に 返金手続きに必要な費用比較も記載 してあるので参考にしてみてください！ 「占いサイトでお金を使ってしまっている」. 아이코스ac파워어댑터

아오이 방귀 「占いサイトで詐欺の被害にあってしまった返金させることはできるのだろうか」 「占い詐欺で返金させるにはどうすればいいのだろう」 「占い詐欺の返金を弁護士に依頼するとどうやってお金を取り戻してくれ. 占い詐欺に騙された！返金してもらえる？ 占い詐欺サイトであれば、払ったお金が返ってくる可能性があります！ ただし. コンディション記載と著しく違う際は返金・交換対応いたしますのでご連絡ください。 米国でタロット占いの母と呼ばれていた故イーデン・グレイの幻の3部作と言われている. 1 スクリーンショットやメッセージを保存する 7 まとめ｜高額請求・占いサイト・詐欺・相談・返金について知っておくべきこと 7. ・心理学・カウンセラーやコーチング・占い・マーケティング・広告運用 そして、途中でやめたとしても勿論返金はなし。 ⁡ サービスの質が.

아이브 리즈 코 디시 Jp › uranaihenkin › entry12816622361弁護士費用比較mother マザー｜株式会社リンク｜占い詐欺に強い. 契約取り消しや返金請求、クレジットカードの支払い停止などに対応 占い詐欺、霊感商法などお任せください。代表弁護士が対応 料金表を. 株式会社リンクが運営する占いサイトmother（マザー）の返金方法について解説しています。 占いサイト マザーは詐欺？ 悪質？ 口コミ評判は？ これらについても調査を行いました。. ただし「悟り」に関しては占いという商品の特性上、非常に厳しい戦いを強いられるのが現実です。 占いは「悟り」だけでなく、具体的な物や明確なサービスの提供とは異なり、結果の保証が非常に曖昧で、感じ方には個人差があります。. サイキック・ラブ・リーディング：同じ時間 彼の気持ちと意図.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.