그 중에서도 남성들 보다 여성 크리에이터들의.

Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

예쁜 틱톡커 초록모자 예쁘게 생긴 여자 틱톡커 초록모자 당산은 초록모자와 dm으로 대화를 한다. 한국의 많은 팔로워를 보유한 틱톡커들 중 팔로워 순위가 높은 5위부터 1위까지의 순위와 리뷰입니다. 틱톡에서 활발하게 활동하는 다재다능한 수많은 틱톡커 중, 스웨그 넘치는 영상을 통해 유행을 선도하는 뷰티력 만렙 틱톡커 4인방을 코스모가 포착했다. Wow 😮 original sound vibin with ambreezo.

웃는 짤 귀척하는 여자 틱톡커 웃는 모습이 예쁜 틱톡커 소개 예쁜 미소를 지닌 틱톡커들을 만나보세요.

Com › @gemini_moon456 › videogemini_moon456 @gemini_moon456’s videos with original sound.. Com › @gemini_moon456 › videogemini_moon456 @gemini_moon456’s videos with original sound..

짖짜 너무ㅜ너무 예쁜 여자 틱톡커 모음.

애기올라프 @oninon_7 님의 Tiktok 틱톡 동영상 진짜 예쁜 틱톡커를 소개합니다.

여자틱톡커 중국 여자 틱톡커들 중국여자 여자틱톡커 여자댄스 섹시댄스 ชงเมา ชงเมา 예쁜여자 땅땅땅땅땅땅땅땅땅땅땅땅땅 챌린지 여자틱톡커 틱톡.

틱톡은 한국의 디지털 트렌드를 주도하며 인기 인플루언서들이 마케팅에 중요한 역할을 하고 있습니다. Com › tag › 예쁜틱톡커예쁜틱톡커 tiktok, 완벽한 바탕 메이크업으로 얼굴을 변신시켜보세요, 총 64명의 후보 중 무작위 32명이 대결합니다. 틱톡커 중 로렌 다음으로 가장 유명한 것으로 보임 3, 틱톡 예쁜여자 땅땅땅땅땅땅땅땅땅땅땅땅땅 챌린지.

찰리가 나오기 전 로렌 그레이 vs 크리스틴 한처 vs 베이비 아리엘 3파전으로 유명했음 4.. 메이크업 틱톡커 틱톡뷰티 틱톡 틱톡영상 틱톡뷰티 인형같이 예쁜 비카 성격도 넘나 좋아서 같이 많이 웃으면서 일했어요.. 역시 틱톡커 ㅎ 동영상크리에이터 였던 인화 라이브 빙송하느라 영상 찍지 못해도 음악 들으면 바로 댄스 가능ㅎ 잠깐만✋만능 크리에이터가 되어보자.. 완벽한 바탕 메이크업으로 얼굴을 변신시켜보세요..

총 64명의 후보 중 무작위 32명이 대결합니다, 중국 랭킹 공유 사이트, 叶子西西에서 지난 3월에 발표한 2021년 틱톡커 상위 10위에 랭크 된 틱톡커를 소개해드릴게요. 예쁜여자 게시물 8517개 tiktok 틱톡 에서 예쁜여자에 대한 최신 동영상을 시청하세요, 틱톡에서 유행하는 내용의 콘텐츠를 발빠르게 찾아, 영상 테크닉을 활용한 영상을 위주로 팬과 소통합니다.

온리팬스무료 오리지널 사운드 랭크로켓 해외선물 철종tv 틱톡커 합성사진 플렉스티비 틱톡커 유부녀 틱톡커 노은솔 틱톡커 음지 틱톡커 고라니율 틱톡커 예쁜틱톡커. Com › @oninon_7 › video나시핏 예쁜 틱톡커 알려주세요 추천떠라 추천안뜨면삐짐 나시 fy. 실은 보이시한 매력의 여성 틱톡커로, 개구쟁이 남동생의 재롱을 보는 듯한 매력이 돋보인다. 국내 인기 틱톡커 중 틱톡커 순위에서 늘 탑으로 꼽히기도 하는데요. 카테고리 이동 color my life with the chaos of trouble 1. 우수한 치어리더 남친

용사 히토미 좋아요 6307개,명언쌤 @dyovjhprihih 님의 tiktok 틱톡 동영상 여자틱톡커가 전하는 자연스러운 물광 메이크업 팁. 역시 틱톡커 ㅎ 동영상크리에이터 였던 인화 라이브 빙송하느라 영상 찍지 못해도 음악 들으면 바로 댄스 가능ㅎ 잠깐만✋만능 크리에이터가 되어보자. 구예서 구운감자 틱톡커 구하리 1998 권예원 귤리아 그릴래영 그잉 기매눌 기몌 기몌민 김가빈 김가온 레이싱 모델 김경현 크리에이터 김고니 2001 김규리 2009 김금비 김다은 유튜버 김도희 2004 김럽미 김밍 김바밍 김보라 모델 김보민 2007 김봄 1996. Com › tag › 예쁜틱톡커예쁜틱톡커 tiktok. Kr › onlinevideo › top102025년 국내 인기 틱톡커 top 5은 누구. 오토펠라치오

오해원 나이 좋아요 80개,돌고래,럽미 첫사랑 ︎ @luv. 역시 틱톡커 ㅎ 동영상크리에이터 였던 인화 라이브 빙송. 먼저 옐언니의 남자친구가 아니냐는 오해마저 받는 신사장. 애기올라프 @oninon_7 님의 tiktok 틱톡 동영상 진짜 예쁜 틱톡커를 소개합니다. User19789 보정떡칠이랑 성괴가 무슨 탑이야 탑은 이런거지 틱톡커순위 예쁜틱톡커 예쁜틱톡커순위 여자틱톡커 장원영 노연우 효승 무보정 안예쁨 윤희 조예리 08 존예 추천. 오해원 노브라

우라라카 오챠코 야스 틱톡 웃는얼굴 예쁜틱톡 이는 ai가 생성한 콘텐츠 요약으로, 사실에 기반한 맥락을 제공하기 위한 것이 아닙니다. 무려 420만 팔로워를 자랑하는 신동호 크리에이터는 본래 면세점 직원으로 근무했었다고 하는데요. 앞서 언급했듯이, 제니, 일명 greeneggsandglam. Com › tag › 예쁜틱톡커예쁜틱톡커 tiktok. Wow 😮 original sound vibin with ambreezo.

왁재왁 그 중에서도 남성들 보다 여성 크리에이터들의. 완벽한 바탕 메이크업으로 얼굴을 변신시켜보세요. 미국 틱톡커 7명 추천 예쁜웃긴운동패션. Com › @luv › video세상모든 예쁜말을 다 해주고도 남을 틱톡커@luv. Com › @gemini_moon456 › videogemini_moon456 @gemini_moon456’s videos with original sound.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.