Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

Com › ironfisher › 223969397537경북 울진 차박 바다낚시 포인트 총정리 네이버 블로그. 울진 여행을 한다면 가벼운 마음으로 소원을 말하고 가는 건 어떨까. 문화적 즐길거리를 찾으신다면 테아트로 무니시팔 데 포메로데, 무제우 포메라노 센트로 컬투랄 데. 휠체어로 이용 가능한 등록 read more.

영서 속바지

휠체어로 이용 가능한 등록 read more.. Org › wiki › 울진군울진군 위키백과, 우리 모두의 백과사전.. 20230909 고양이 오랜만이야 잘근잘근 고구마순.. 포우사다 빌라스 도 아틀란티코은는 에어컨, 냉장고, 미니바을를 포함한 다양한 시설을 구비하고 있고, 무료 무선 인터넷 이용이 가능하기 때문에 인터넷도 마음껏..

예쁜 실제 인어 공주

포항시, 강원특별자치도 강릉시, 동해시 와 함께 울릉도 로 들어가는 여객선이 있는 대표적인 지역이다. 조선 시대 에는 읍성이 있었으며 울진포영 浦營을 설치하고 수군만호 水軍萬戶를 두었다, 경북 울진에는 국내에서 가장 멋스러운 소나무들이 군락을 이루고 있는 ‘비밀의 숲’도, 산과 절벽으로 둘러싸인 오지 계곡도 있다. 포우사다 헤푸지움 특가, 예약, 가격 nol 인터파크투어. 포우사다 빌라스 도 아틀란티코 hotel pousada villas do.

울진에서 대게 먹고 바다만 보고 왔다면 다음 울진 여행에선 숲속으로 발길을 돌려보자, 2018년 7월 16일 경상북도의 문화재자료 제662호로 지정되었다, 대게의 본고장이라 불리는 후포항은 울진 여행의 대표 명소입니다, 포우사다 헤푸지움 특가, 예약, 가격 nol 인터파크투어.

포우사다 빌라스 도 아틀란티코 hotel pousada villas do, 안녕하세요 저는 2019년 4월 9일 태어난 레이입니다 울진 경상북도 울진 울진군 러시안블루 고양이 cat. 포우사다 다 조 rua pinto branco, 246 2026 샤워 시설을 갖춘 욕실이 마련되어 있습니다, 5km 거리에 있으며, 무료 wifi를 이용할 수 있는 인터넷카페와 조식 뷔페를 제공합니다. 마타 지 상 주앙아수다 토히에 위치한 포우사다.

등기산스카이워크에서 바라본 갓바위의 옆모습이다, 울진 여행을 한다면 가벼운 마음으로 소원을 말하고 가는 건 어떨까, 울진 광도사 신중도 울진 광도사 신중도 蔚珍 廣度寺 神衆圖는 대한민국 경상북도 울진군 후포면 후포리, 광도사에 있는 신중도이다. 조선 시대 에는 읍성이 있었으며 울진포영 浦營을 설치하고 수군만호 水軍萬戶를 두었다.

여코레드

포우사다 다 조 rua pinto branco, 246 2026 샤워 시설을 갖춘 욕실이 마련되어 있습니다. 울진에서 대게 먹고 바다만 보고 왔다면 다음 울진 여행에선 숲속으로 발길을 돌려보자. 블로그 안부 fishing story 1,156개의 글 목록열기. 본인이 생각하는 것을 직접 말해야 현실에서 이뤄지니, 이 기회에 후포 갓바위의 힘을 빌려 소원을 외쳐보도록 하자, 울진은 울진군과 평해군이 합군한 곳으로 본시 고구려 의 우진야현 于珍也縣이었으며 남북국 시대 때 울진으로 고쳐 군으로 하고, 고려 때 현으로 하였다. 자세한 내용은 울진군교통 문서를 참고하십시오.

Paraty 포우사다 플로레세 여행 g마켓. 경북 울진 가볼만한곳 울진 등기산 스카이워크 후포항 은어다리 울진 불영사 네이버 블로그 경상도여행 368개의 글 목록열기. 블로그 안부 fishing story 1,156개의 글 목록열기, 포우사다 두 산디 sandi hotel 파라티 호텔 트립어드바이저. 공감과 댓글은 방랑아짐의 뽈뽈거림에 큰 힘이 됩니다.

연애 질투 디시 휠체어로 이용 가능한 등록 read more. 페드로 롱고 거리 부근에 위치 야외 수영장 같은 레크리에이션 시설을 이용하거나 정원에서 전망을 즐기실 수 있습니다. 울진에서 대게 먹고 바다만 보고 왔다면 다음 울진 여행에선 숲속으로 발길을 돌려보자. 대게의 본고장이라 불리는 후포항은 울진 여행의 대표 명소입니다. 포우사다 블라우베르그의 경우 포메로드에 위치하고 있습니다. 여자가 방귀 뀌는 짤

오늘의 가족 디시 2025년 12월 30일, ktx이음이 울진역에 첫발을 내디디며 울진은 더 이상 접근하기 어려운 ‘동해안의 섬’이 아닌, 수도권에서 서너 시간. 자세한 내용은 울진군교통 문서를 참고하십시오. 블로그 안부 fishing story 1,156개의 글 목록열기. 포우사다 빌라스 도 아틀란티코은는 에어컨, 냉장고, 미니바을를 포함한 다양한 시설을 구비하고 있고, 무료 무선 인터넷 이용이 가능하기 때문에 인터넷도 마음껏. 샤워 시설을 갖춘 욕실이 마련되어 있습니다. 여장남자 히토미

여자 장난감 종류 마타 지 상 주앙아수다 토히에 위치한 포우사다. Org › wiki › 울진군울진군 위키백과, 우리 모두의 백과사전. 자세한 곳곳의 후기는 차차 올리도록 할게요. Com › ironfisher › 223969397537경북 울진 차박 바다낚시 포인트 총정리 네이버 블로그. 다만 울진 자체가 워낙 벽지다 보니 울진으로 통해서 울릉도 로 가는 여행객이 많지는 않은 실정이다. 여자 몸 평가 좀 디시

연초봄 남친 디시 포항시, 강원특별자치도 강릉시, 동해시 와 함께 울릉도 로 들어가는 여객선이 있는 대표적인 지역이다. 포우사다 다 조 rua pinto branco, 246 2026 샤워 시설을 갖춘 욕실이 마련되어 있습니다. 2018년 7월 16일 경상북도의 문화재자료 제662호로 지정되었다. 이곳에서는 wifi 외에도 매일 0700 0900에 주문. 문화적 즐길거리를 찾으신다면 테아트로 무니시팔 데 포메로데, 무제우 포메라노 센트로 컬투랄 데.

여자 s 성향 비율 조선 시대 에는 읍성이 있었으며 울진포영 浦營을 설치하고 수군만호 水軍萬戶를 두었다. 휠체어로 이용 가능한 등록 read more. 5km 거리에 있으며, 무료 wifi를 이용할 수 있는 인터넷카페와 조식 뷔페를 제공합니다. 샤워 시설을 갖춘 욕실이 마련되어 있습니다. 조선 시대 에는 읍성이 있었으며 울진포영 浦營을 설치하고 수군만호 水軍萬戶를 두었다.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.