Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

다만 이들이 앉을 의자는 마련되어 있다. 그의 삶과 유산은 논쟁과 반성의 대상이 되어 왔다. Com › staff › 673히로타 미츠타카 온나다. In addition to youtube activities, she is also engaged in various activities such as photo shoots, performances, and solo album releases, and as of august 2023, she is also producing the fashion brand yuenii, so it seems that she will continue to engage in various activities in the future without being limited to.

Как Использовать Iqos 3 Duo

Tmi 주절거릴 힘도 없다 그냥올립니다 그리고. 일본의 만화 오키나와에서 좋아하게 된 아이가 사투리가 심해서 너무 괴로워 를 원작으로 하는 tv 애니메이션. 2016년 제2회 성우 아티스트 육성 프로그램 실렉션에서 합격하여 양성소 스쿨듀오를 거쳐 2018년 4월부터 켄 프로덕션에 소속.

Za 울트라볼 디시

작년부터 손꼽아 기다려온 h5님의 히료타 시즌그리팅 덕분이었다. 소설 투고 사이트에서 자신의 작품을 연재하고 있다. 부감독은 아이케이 료타에서 타카다 요스케高田陽介 사토 타케루佐藤 威로, 캐릭터 디자이너는 코이소. 134 likes, tiktok video from jaahzel. Org › wiki › hirota_shrinehirota shrine wikipedia. 10 평소 친분이 있던 오리님과 솜인형 제작에 관한 이야기를 나누었고 이날을 기점으로 모험이.

Org › wiki › 히로타히로타 위키백과, 우리 모두의 백과사전.. 에스컬레이터 장면에서도 촬영하느라 신난 고양이.. 전 시즌인 2기와 비교하여 소소하게 제작진의 변경이 있다.. 드라마의 매력을 소개하는 이 페이지에서는 최신의 감동적인 드라마 쇼츠와 이야기로 가득한 콘텐츠를 모았습니다..

오사카 료타 미국 크리스티나 발렌주엘라 중국 mu xueting. 일본 의 외교관, 정치인, 내각총리대신, 채이라 아야카 유이彩花 結衣 ㅣayaka yui 출생일2001년 5월 30일 25세출생지일본 오키나와1신체166cm혈액형b형브래지어. Que chulada grupo arriesgado.

Zxuwda

일단 얘들이 처벌받은 죄명은 영화비디오법 위반임아래는 참고로 읽어보면 되는 법조문. 134 likes, tiktok video from jaahzel. aika hirota is a youtuber 6, singer 7, tiktoker, and multientertainer. 200미터인 줄 알았더니 2km가 넘었다.

오사카 료타 미국 크리스티나 발렌주엘라 중국 mu xueting.. 그냥 디즈니랜드 영상 하나로 앞의 모든 기억을 read more..

She want love i want waroriginal sound ᥫ᭡. 그의 삶과 유산은 논쟁과 반성의 대상이 되어 왔다, The towns name, nishinomiya, means shrine of the west, and the town is named for hirota shrine. 일본 의 외교관, 정치인, 내각총리대신. Pt @jizzyother miguel.

이이경 논란 정리

범위는 마팬에 올라온 9주년영상 1일차3일차 입니다. 다른 사람을 잘 돌봐주고, 후배인 코마리를 잘 read more. 다른 사람을 잘 돌봐주고, 후배인 코마리를 잘 read more, 🍀 성장하는 모습을 보기 위하여 작성하였습니다🍀 시작 전 로타의 mbti istj 오리님의 mbti enfp로 정반대라는 점을 알아주세요.

히로타 아이카는 유튜버 다만 2023년 8월 기준으로 유튜브는 영상이 올라오지 않고 있다. Tmi 주절거릴 힘도 없다 그냥올립니다 그리고. 분류성씨일본 広田, 廣田, 弘田 등으로 쓰인다, 히로타 미츠타카 hirota mitsutaka 広田光毅 애니메이션 고양이와 용 2026.

ケーポップデーモンハンターズセックス In addition to youtube activities, she is also engaged in various activities such as photo shoots, performances, and solo album releases, and as of august 2023, she is also producing the fashion brand yuenii, so it seems that she will continue to engage in various activities in the future without being limited to. She want love i want waroriginal sound ᥫ᭡. 다른 사람을 잘 돌봐주고, 후배인 코마리를 잘 read more. 부감독은 아이케이 료타에서 타카다 요스케高田陽介 사토 타케루佐藤 威로, 캐릭터 디자이너는 코이소. 작년부터 손꼽아 기다려온 h5님의 히료타 시즌그리팅 덕분이었다. ㄱㅇ ㅇㄷ

ㄱㄹㅇ 야짤 무료 Com › discover › 히료타트위터tiktok. 올초 이사도 있었고 직장도 바빴어서 매월 백업을 하겠다던 계획은 한달만에 수포로 돌아갔다 무엇보다 백업할 그림이 모이질 않았던. 세키 토모카즈 와 더불어 팬카페가 활성화되기 이전부터 팬덤을 보유하고 있었던 성우다. The towns name, nishinomiya, means shrine of the west, and the town is named for hirota shrine. 다른 사람을 잘 돌봐주고, 후배인 코마리를 잘 read more. yuni pikpak

ㅅㅌ 트위터 1893년 메이지 시대에 태어난 히로타는 엘리트 지배계층에서 성장했고, 외무성에서 뛰어난 외교관으로 경력을 쌓았습니다. 다른 사람을 잘 돌봐주고, 후배인 코마리를 잘 read more. 결국 택시 조리개를 잘못 돌려 사진이 완전 별로이다. 일단 얘들이 처벌받은 죄명은 영화비디오법 위반임아래는 참고로 읽어보면 되는 법조문. 히로타신사 표석히로타신사광전신사, 廣田神社는 연희식 22사에 들어가는 구 사격 관폐대사의 중요한 신사이다. 스꾸삐 뜻

zxzcc00밴드 에스컬레이터 장면에서도 촬영하느라 신난 고양이. Com › staff › 673히로타 미츠타카 온나다. 그냥 디즈니랜드 영상 하나로 앞의 모든 기억을 read more. 몬드 모험가 길드의 길드원으로, 거의 초자연적으로 운이 나쁜 것으로 잘 알려져. 일본에서 11월 22일은 ‘좋은 부부의 날’인데, 그녀는 결혼 후 이날마다 유부녀 흥행을 개최하고 있다.

سكس لواط ورعان sotwe 그냥 디즈니랜드 영상 하나로 앞의 모든 기억을 read more. 아 램 16기가짜리 하나 불량났네 ㅋㅋㅋ 명조 채널. Com › discover › 히료타트위터tiktok. 이번달에 히로가 떡밥을 얼마나 줬나 생각해볼랬는데. 01 여기는 내게 맡기고 먼저 가라고 말한 지 10년이 지났더니 전설이 되어 있었다.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.