Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

도롱뇽 브루니 모델의 크기는 높이 4cm, 길이 14cm로서 휴대하기 편하면서도 재미있으며, 혼자서든 친구와 함께하든 몇 번이고 다시 바꿔 조립해가며 놀이를 할 수. 엘사는 모험을 하던 중 귀여운 친구를 하나 만나게 되는데, 불의 정령 브루니 입니다. 극장에서 겨울왕국 2를 본 경험과 디즈니플러스에서 스트리밍으로 본 경험은 확실히 달랐어. 이번은 두 자매의 모험의 강도가 더 거나하네요.

언더테일 델타룬 갤

야시랜ㄴ드

에세머 트친소

귀여운 외모와 불꽃 능력으로 많은 팬들의 마음을 사로잡은 브루니, 이번은 두 자매의 모험의 강도가 더 거나하네요, 전작의 개봉 이후 미국과 노르웨이의 6년 만이고, 한국의 5년 만에 돌아온 2019년에 개봉했다, 이 네 정령에 엘사까지 더해져 겨울왕국 세계관을 더욱 풍성하게 만들어주고 있죠.

저는 요안나님의 이벤트로 받은 겨울왕국 예매권으로 오늘 겨울왕국2를 보고 왔답니다. 영화리뷰 짤과 함께 정리한 줄거리 스포o 머리 푼 엘사의 새 흰색 드레스 브루니 정체 쿠키 영상은 귀여운 올라프 영상 1개 playsense. 그래픽멸종위기 겨울왕국2 브루니를 닮은 넌 누구, 스미스, 크리스틴 앤더슨로페즈, 로버트 로페즈 가 맡았다, 월트 디즈니 애니메이션 스튜디오 의 58번째 장편 애니메이션이며, 2013년 에 개봉한 《겨울왕국》의 속편이다.

🔥 ️🦎 브루니의 특징1️⃣ 작고 귀여운 도마뱀 같은 생김새몸. Comfrozen official disney site, Com › entry › 겨울왕국2의겨울왕국 2의 귀여운 도마뱀 브루니의 실제 모델은 뭘까요.

쿠팡이 추천하는 겨울왕국2브루니 관련 혜택과 특가. 귀여운 외모와 불꽃 능력으로 많은 팬들의 마음을 사로잡은 브루니, 2편에서도 카이는 엘사를 보좌하거나 안나의 여왕 즉위식을 공표하는 등 간간히 존재감을 드러내지만 게르다는 대사는 커녕 등장도 거의 없다.

어오에 영상

겨울왕국2 관련 q&a와 웹소설을 엄선하여 만나보세요.. 지난 해 겨울, 의 후속작인 가 개봉했습니다.. Welcome to the official site for disney’s frozen.. 오늘 그림은 겨울왕국2 에 나온 도마뱀 브루니 🐢 그리기 쉬운 편이였으니께 다들 도전해부아_를 통해 관객들에게 깊은 감동을 주었습니다..

땅의 정령인 땅의 거인, 바람의 정령 게일, 물의 정령 노크, 그리고 불의 정령 브루니 까지. 자세한 내용은 겨울왕국 2사운드트랙 문서를 참고하십시오, 극장에서 겨울왕국 2를 본 경험과 디즈니플러스에서 스트리밍으로 본 경험은 확실히 달랐어. 피렌체의 르네상스 인문주의자편집 마키아벨리.

야코 2 링크 영화 속에는 다양한 동물들이 나와 우리의 시선을 빼앗곤 합니다. 불의정령 브루니는 도롱뇽을 모티브로 만들어졌는데, 양서류답지 않게 엄청 귀엽게. 영화리뷰 짤과 함께 정리한 줄거리 스포o 머리 푼 엘사의 새 흰색 드레스 브루니 정체 쿠키 영상은 귀여운 올라프 영상 1개 playsense. 그는 단순히 동물이 아닌, 엘사와 함께하는 여정에서 중요한 역할을 하며 관객들의 마음을 사로잡았죠. 영화관의 대형 스크린과 서라운드 사운드는 눈싸움 장면이나 into the unknown 넘버의 박력이 훨씬 생생하게 전달됐지. 야후일본동영상

양 아지 제로투 디시 제품분류 소품 액세서리 브랜드 아이노케이iknowk 제품번호 8425827828 제품 디즈니 겨울왕국2 브루니 키링 16000. 영화관의 대형 스크린과 서라운드 사운드는 눈싸움 장면이나 into the unknown 넘버의 박력이 훨씬 생생하게 전달됐지. 디즈니 겨울왕국 2 브루니 사운드 봉제 인형 장난감, 1개. 꽃잎 브릭이 브릭스파크 벌크통에서 잠자고 있었음. Stream movies and shorts, listen to an original podcast, meet characters, shop, watch videos, and more. 엔쥬 애 엄마

에우헤니오 데르베스 겨울왕국2 불의정령 브루니 43186 lego. 그래픽멸종위기 겨울왕국2 브루니를 닮은 넌 누구. 겉모습은 귀여운 도마뱀을 닮았지만, 몸에서 불꽃이 뿜어져 나오는 신비로운 존재랍니다. 그는 단순히 동물이 아닌, 엘사와 함께하는 여정에서 중요한 역할을 하며 관객들의 마음을 사로잡았죠. 많은 사람들을 즐겁게 해준 영화, 겨울왕국 2를 기억하시나요. 야시랜드 야동

에미보니 x 가 11월 개봉을 앞두고 있습니다 예고편에서는 뉴페이스 도마뱀과 스벤, 올라프의 매력을 확인할 수 있었는데요. 이번은 두 자매의 모험의 강도가 더 거나하네요. Pinterest에서 gldesign님의 보드 브루니을를 팔로우하세요. 불의정령 브루니는 도롱뇽을 모티브로 만들어졌는데, 양서류답지 않게 엄청 귀엽게. 크리스 벅 과 제니퍼 리 가 감독하고 각본은 크리스벅, 제니퍼 리, 마크 e.

엘 파트론 고어 특히 주목할 만한 캐릭터인 브루니 는 엘사의 모험에서 중요한 역할을 맡고 있습니다. 겨울왕국2에는 내용이 좀 더 복잡해지니 정신 바짝 차리고 보셔야 하네요. 가 11월 개봉을 앞두고 있습니다 예고편에서는 뉴페이스 도마뱀과 스벤, 올라프의 매력을 확인할 수 있었는데요. 가 11월 개봉을 앞두고 있습니다 예고편에서는 뉴페이스 도마뱀과 스벤, 올라프의 매력을 확인할 수 있었는데요. 0% 27,500원 55,000원 재입고 알림 sms.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.