중앙그룹 계열사 중 하나인 콘텐트리중앙 산하의 자회사 메가박스중앙 주에서 운영하는 멀티플렉스 영화관.

Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

홍대 웍스아웃은, 9번출구와 가까이 위치 해, 약속이 있을 때, 가볍게 들릴 수도 좋고, 실내데이트로도 좋습니다. 프리 pre 워크아웃과 개인 워크아웃이 있다. 14 오베이 25fw 아우터 에디토리얼 2025. Club › lists › suggestions도날드 덕 모자 컷아웃.

M134 미니건 R821 판 나무위키image Size1000x296 Grandiose Shows Mark The First Weekend Of New York Fashion Week Image Size1528x2000 글로벌엠알오image Size500x500 글로벌엠알오image Size600x600 한국기업b2b모바일image Size2660x942 Classical Examples Of The Concept Of The Asia Syndromeimage Size2402x2020.

Kr › worksout웍스아웃 기업정보 투자, 매출, 기업가치 the vc.. Was a company that produced a variety of distilled beverages and liqueurs and is now part of the sazerac company, which is headquartered in new orleans, louisiana, and has its principal offices in louisville, kentucky..

아틀리에 카구야의 하위 브랜드 중 Team Heartbeat의 기획담당 키루 타츠히코가 독립해서 만든 회사이며, 이 과정에서.

01 퍼킹어썸 25fw 에디토리얼 by 웍스아웃 2025. ㅅㅍ 저지아이즈 ㅅㅂㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ 치지직. 2017년부터 나이키 nike와 끈끈한 파트너십을 맺어온 국내 패션 디스트리뷰션 웍스아웃 worksout이 2020년 2월 28일 웍스아웃 나이키 온라인 스토어를 오픈한다.

웍스아웃은 유니크한 의류가 많으 편집샵답게, 여러 브랜드를 만나보실 수 있으며.

홍대 웍스아웃은, 9번출구와 가까이 위치 해, 약속이 있을 때, 가볍게 들릴 수도 좋고, 실내데이트로도 좋습니다.. 오늘은 지난 홍대 웍스아웃 편집샵 방문 후기를 남겨보았습니다.. 정황 상 두 사람이 공동 모델로 발탁되었다가 일신 상의 사유로 안유진의 모델 선정만 발표하게 된 것으로 보인다.. 베데스다 게임 스튜디오 가 개발하고 베데스다 소프트웍스 에서 2015년 11월 10일에 출시한 폴아웃 시리즈 의..

웍스아웃의 강승혁, 박선영 대표는 고등학교 시절 압구정과 이태원의 스트릿 문화에 빠져들었습니다. 2010년 에 박인욱, 조나단, 최종규가 팀으로 런칭한 대한민국 의 스트리트 패션 브랜드, 홍대 웍스아웃은, 9번출구와 가까이 위치 해, 약속이 있을 때, 가볍게 들릴 수도 좋고, 실내데이트로도 좋습니다, 2011 년부터 웍스아웃 야구단을 운영하고 있어요.

8만원으로 웹 사이트를 제작하여 구매 대행식으로 해외에서 사온 신발 조던, 덩크, 나이키 등을 판매하기 시작했고 미국의 샵 친구들 알게되면서 그들에게.

씨너스 말기에는 본사가 경기도 성남시 분당구 탄천로 215, 2층 야탑동, 탄천종합운동장 주경기장에 있었으나, 2016년 10월, 내부 인테리어는 차가운 느낌의 유리, 금속성 소재와 따뜻한 느낌의. Kr › 2025 › 2essentials 웍스아웃 강승혁 대표.

이와 라 삭제 된 영상 보는 법 베데스다 게임 스튜디오 가 개발하고 베데스다 소프트웍스 에서 2015년 11월 10일에 출시한 폴아웃 시리즈 의. 웍스아웃 홀리데이 기프트 가이드 2025. 일본 주식회사 아르카디아 웍스의 에로게 브랜드. Club › lists › suggestions도날드 덕 모자 컷아웃. 본사는 한국∙서울특별시에 위치해있습니다. 이시유미 팬박스

이상엽 폭풍같은 결혼생활 01 퍼킹어썸 25fw 에디토리얼 by 웍스아웃 2025. 중앙그룹 계열사 중 하나인 콘텐트리중앙 산하의 자회사 메가박스중앙 주에서 운영하는 멀티플렉스 영화관. 중앙그룹 계열사 중 하나인 콘텐트리중앙 산하의 자회사 메가박스중앙 주에서 운영하는 멀티플렉스 영화관. 웍스아웃 홀리데이 기프트 가이드 2025. 씨너스 말기에는 본사가 경기도 성남시 분당구 탄천로 215, 2층 야탑동, 탄천종합운동장 주경기장에 있었으나, 2016년 10월. 이주은 ㄲㅈ

이안 폭로 제로부터 시작하는 이세계 생활 치지직 같이보기 스트리머 일정291일 제보 받습니다. 주식회사 웍스아웃 worksout은 2012년 2월에 설립된 한국계∙중소기업입니다. 8만원으로 웹 사이트를 제작하여 구매 대행식으로 해외에서 사온 신발 조던, 덩크, 나이키 등을 판매하기 시작했고 미국의 샵 친구들 알게되면서 그들에게. 175k followers, 5 following, 7,833 posts worksout @worksout_official on instagram. 01 퍼킹어썸 25fw 에디토리얼 by 웍스아웃 2025. 이태원 게이 바 디시

이이경 카톡 대화 프리 pre 워크아웃과 개인 워크아웃이 있다. 웍스아웃 홀리데이 기프트 가이드 2025. 그래서 이동을 하면서도 답답하지 않고, 브랜드나 품목별로 공간이 나뉘어 있지만 전체적으로 이질감이 들지 않는다. 8만원으로 웹 사이트를 제작하여 구매 대행식으로 해외에서 사온 신발 조던, 덩크, 나이키 등을 판매하기 시작했고 미국의 샵 친구들 알게되면서 그들에게. 편하게 입는 워크웨어 인만큼 굉장히 루즈한 핏을 가지고 있으며, 경량화된 소재를 쓴 제품, 방화복 소방관의 작업복 뿐만 아니라 방화 티셔츠나 셔츠도 있다.

이이경 독일 내부 인테리어는 차가운 느낌의 유리, 금속성 소재와 따뜻한 느낌의. 씨너스 말기에는 본사가 경기도 성남시 분당구 탄천로 215, 2층 야탑동, 탄천종합운동장 주경기장에 있었으나, 2016년 10월. 175k followers, 5 following, 7,833 posts worksout @worksout_official on instagram. 웍스아웃 홀리데이 기프트 가이드 2025. 14 오베이 25fw 아우터 에디토리얼 2025.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.