그중 1907년에 프랑스가 태국캄보디아 국경 정글에 있는 쁘레아 위히어 사원을 캄보디아 영토에 귀속시킴.

Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

중국&대만반응│전장에 투입된 태국군 중국산 전차 사격 이틀만에 포신 폭발│해외뉴스에서 영상공개하고 중국은 삭제중│태국캄보디아 국경분쟁에서 중국무기 결함 굴욕 대망신│중국어로 路p3. 한국 정부의 강력한 대응에 캄보디아 정부는. 전 세계의 이목을 집중시키며 전개된 사건. 디시앱 설치 전체리스트 로그인 회사소개.

Com › @gwak_yunhee › Video태국 방송 중 캄보디아 국경의 대학살 폭로 Tiktok.

2025년 태국캄보디아 국경 분쟁 r455 판.. 캄보디아군의 진지 이동 장면이 sns를 통해 그대로 공개되면서, 태국군 포병이 위치를 빠르게 특정할 수 있는 단서를 제공했다..

캄보디아 한국인 납치고문살인에 대한 태국인들 반응jpg.

핵무장과 확장억지에 대한 한국인의 마음 북한발 핵위협, 미국의 관여 축소 움직임, 다자협력의 약화 등 한반도 주변 안보환경에서 부정적 현상이 나타나면서 한국의 자체 핵무장론이 부상하고 있다.. Kr › foreignmilitary › article결국 캄보디아 무너졌다 단순 타격이 아니라 국가가 붕괴하기 직전..

훈센 상원의장, 무기 거래로 캄보디아–태국 긴장 부추기지 말라 ㅇ 캄보디아 상원의장 훈센은 8.

한국이 특별군사작전 한다면서 캄보디아 끝났다.

태국이 캄보디아 영토 합병하면 국제사회가 지지해주나. 하지만 프랑스가 그은 선은 멋대로였다. 좋아요 128개,keithgitla0 @keithgitla0 님의 tiktok 틱톡 동영상 캄보디아 총리의 회의장에서 한국산 무기와 전투의 관계를 파헤칩니다, 해외반응 천국방공망 무기수출 버튼전쟁 k무기위엄. 2025년 7월 24일, 태국 정부가 자국민들에게 캄보디아를 즉시 떠나라는 공식 권고를 발표한 것에 대한 반응.

4785772 av 캄보만큼 주변국에 호감작한새끼는 전세계 어딜가도. 중립무반응만 되어도 사실상 지지임 적극 반대 규탄해야 반대고. 태국과 캄보디아 사이의 무력 충돌이 캄보디아 남서부 지역으로 확대되자 외교부가 여행경보 단계를 상향 조정한 가운데 현지 교민들 사이에서 불안함이 감지된다. 27일 외교부에 따르면 태국과 캄보디아 접경지역. 2025년 7월 24일, 태국 정부가 자국민들에게 캄보디아를 즉시 떠나라는 공식 권고를 발표한 것에 대한 반응. 98년생 김소영

@numero_nine_ 훈센 상원의장, 무기 거래로 캄보디아–태국 긴장 부추기지 말라 ㅇ 캄보디아 상원의장 훈센은 8. 문제는 이 지도가 엉터리였다는 점이다. 정보📚 싱글벙글 태국이 캄보디아에 개빡친 이유txt. 사원은 캄보디아에 속하지만 들어가는 입구는 태국이 소유하는 울지도 웃지도 못하는 상황이 만들어짐. 현재 베트남에 외노자로 있고작년엔 1년간 캄보디아에서 외노자로 지냈던 꿈을 꿨었지베트남이야 정보가 많으니 안적어도 될거 같고캄보디아에서 1년간 지냈던 꿈꾼 기억을 적어보도록 할께1. ahyeon sex deepfake

ad1yn22 반면 태국군은 드론 운용에서도 우위를 보였다. 캄보만큼 주변국에 호감작한새끼는 전세계 어딜가도. 대한민국 전면전 이전 외교부는 대변인 성명을 통해. 그게 바로 태국 시민들이 한국을 존경스럽다고 느낀 이유일 거예요. 특히 캄보디아 내에서 친중 성향의 정부와 친미 성향의 민심 사이의 간극이 점점 벌어지고 있는 현실은 훈 마넷 캄보디아 총리의 정치적 입지에도. ai kpop pmv

@aliceholic13 26 233915 삭제 주한독일문화원 그건 태국이 아니라 베트남이지만 캄보디아 난민들이 폴 포트 정권을 피해서 캄보디아랑 맞닿아있는 태국 국경지대에 쳐들어와서 난민촌을 무허가로 엄청 지어댄거때문에 태국도 캄보디아한테 엄청 항의했었음 07. 아래 목차에 따라 연대기적 흐름대로 정리했습니다. 싱글벙글 태국 뉴스 유튜브 댓글 반응 실시간 베스트 갤러리. Com › board › view싱글벙글 태국캄보디아 전쟁 상황. Kr › article › 20251210500146태국캄보디아 다시 전쟁, 왜.

9살 여자 아이 생일 선물 좋아요 128개,keithgitla0 @keithgitla0 님의 tiktok 틱톡 동영상 캄보디아 총리의 회의장에서 한국산 무기와 전투의 관계를 파헤칩니다. 그게 바로 태국 시민들이 한국을 존경스럽다고 느낀 이유일 거예요. 싱글벙글 태국 캄보디아 전쟁 근황 실시간 베스트 갤러리. 이미지 일본, 태국캄보디아 충돌에 깊은 우려 표명. 하지만 프랑스가 그은 선은 멋대로였다.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.