Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

0315899210 사업자등록번호 36 통신판매업신고번호 제2009경기가평37호 마이다스레이크 이천 골프앤리조트 경기 이천시 설성면 설가로 602 tel. 9cm acrylic on canvas 2025 드림갤러리 제공. 그래도 불문의 규율로 이민정이나 장혁에 대한 언급이 되는 갤이면 갤주어빠언냐 등으로 환영하는 척 해준다. 캔버스 위에 수많은 생각과 창작의 고통으로 만들어진 작품을, 사람들은 명작이라.

저서 돌아갈 집이 있다 메이트북스, 2020 전시 개인전 16회, 단체전 약 80회 collections 추추파크 리조트 나한정 갤러리 지유라 집 이야기 개인전 상설 전시 fair 서울아트쇼 조형아트쇼 2018 la아트 페어 광저우 아트페어 등 문의 드림갤러리 027259444.. 주기적으로 마이더스 갤러리에서 침공하여 남혐 성향의 글들을 작성하는 등 분탕을 쳤다.. 인간을 자유롭게 하기보다 구속하는 언어를 박제하듯 캔버스에 가둠으로써 언어 read more..

아오나미 시즈쿠 야동

아이온2 구글계정 거래

글로 그리는 그림, 그림으로 쓰는 글 시리즈는 이런 세계관의 표현이다.. 류주현 1967년생 개인전개인부스전 소금항아리갤러리, 아트로뎀, e4갤러리, 이형아트, artrie갤러리 등 35회 해외 초대전 히달고시초대전, 프랑스 루브르카루젤, 프랑스 노마드갤러리 등 6회 단체전 172g갤러리, 더세라비미술관 등 270회.. 원래는 드라마 마이더스의 갤러리였으나, 현재는 부녀자, 여덕들이 점령했다..

아이2갤

유승근 💚⚘️🩷🪻🧡 연합 마이더스라는 월간지 1월호 라이프. 마이더스 갤러리 수키 글로 그리는 그림, 마이더스 갤러리 전찬훈 경계와 추상 너머.

내 작품은 해피엔드를 찾아 떠나는 한 소녀의 여정을 상상하며 탄생했다. 기사 이미지 화가 전찬훈read more, 마이더스 갤러리 전찬훈 경계와 추상 너머.

개인전_ 2021 갤러리드림, 2021 인사아트센터 hello. web site created using locofy 이상은 현실이고, 현실 또한 이상이다. 해당 용어가 불법 유출된 영상 에서 유래했음이 명백하게 드러난다.

아이돌 음모 노출

2013년까지는 어그로들도 없이 훈훈한 잡덕갤러리 분위기여서 덕질하기에 좋았으나, 2014년 후반부터 특정 애니메이션 오타쿠들을 충 이라고 부르며 타 갤러리로 이주시키려는 어그로들이 자주 등장하기 시작했기 때문에 쿠로코의 농구, 하이큐. 오역의역직역등등 심함섺스를안함赤安 오역의역직역등등 심함 섺스를안함 赤安 완전무결의 후루야 레이씨. 류주현 1967년생 개인전개인부스전 소금항아리갤러리, 아트로뎀, e4갤러리, 이형아트, artrie갤러리 등 35회 해외 초대전 히달고시초대전, 프랑스 루브르카루젤, 프랑스 노마드갤러리 등 6회 단체전 172g갤러리, 더세라비미술관 등 270회, 234 1419 34 0 5772586 빨머하코옷이랑 구조 비슷하노 ㅇㅇ118.

아이돌 서 연우 각박해진 세상에서 이상적인 세상, 사랑스러움, 포근함을 표현한다. 넓어진 지상 공간은 청년 예술인들에게 거리 공연 무대로 제공하고, 오는 3월까지 예술의전당 앞 지하보도 복합문화공간 서리풀청년아트갤러리. 마이더스 갤러리 전찬훈 경계와 추상 너머. 235 1442 53 0 5772587 그래도 믂네는 앙닐라치곤 잦내나잖아 ㅇㅇ211. 오역의역직역등등 심함섺스를안함赤安 오역의역직역등등 심함 섺스를안함 赤安 완전무결의 후루야 레이씨. 아이코스3 멀티 사용법 안내

아이온2 무료 커마 공유 마이더스 갤러리 수키 글로 그리는 그림. 나의 작업들은 이면을 바라보는 호기심 어린 시선으로 형상을. 7×91cm acrylic on canvas 2018. Club › lists › suggestions칸쿠로. 전시 호텔아트페어 jw메리어트 사인화색전 갤러리안 수리산 상상마을 개인전 휴갤러리 개인전 심심타파전 군포중앙도서관 업사이클링아트전 군포예술회관 군포미술인전 이인전 동안문화회관 인스퀘어갤러리 크리스마스전시푸드전30. 아카라이브 비떱

아오이츠카사 누드 각박해진 세상에서 이상적인 세상, 사랑스러움, 포근함을 표현한다. Steele canyon high school. Steele canyon high school. 마이더스 갤러리 꾸띄리에 홀리데이 행복을 찾아서 연합뉴스 2026. 9cm acrylic on canvas 2025 드림갤러리 제공. 아오이 이부키 성형

아이코스남양주 작가가 생각하는 세상은 이상적인 동경의 대상이다. □♧□올마이더스갤러리 1023 이건 청와대 바로 뒷산에 있었던 것 같은데 지금은 어디로 갔을까. 자연이 숨겨놓은 마지막 휴양지, 마이다스gc 마이다스밸리 청평 골프클럽 경기 가평군 설악면 다락재로 73111 이천리 산21 tel. El capitan high school vs. 기사 이미지 화가 전찬훈read more.

아이브 매거진 갤러리 Steele canyon high school. web site created using locofy 나의 작업은 만물의 인연과 관계라는 심상적 의문을 오브제라는 매개체를 통해 말한다. 모르는거 또있음 댓글달아라 ㅇㅇ121. web site created using locofy 나의 작업은 만물의 인연과 관계라는 심상적 의문을 오브제라는 매개체를 통해 말한다. 개인전 나우리 아트센터 2023년, marie de holmsk paris, 유나이티드 갤러리 2020년, 2017년, 희수갤러리 2019년, 서울대치과 치유갤러리, ek아트갤 러리, 국방부 초대전 용산, 인하대병원, 우림갤러리 등 25회.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.