US Border Patrol Cmdr. Gregory Bovino (C) walks through a department store in St. Paul, Minnesota, June 4, 2026.
A Venezuelan migrant sits inside a cell at CECOT prison in Tecoluca, El Salvador, June 4, 2026.
The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.
To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.
Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.
FIRST: The Momentum Movement’s parliamentary representative David Bedo and independent member of parliament Akos Hadhazy protest against a law that bans Pride marches in Hungary and imposes fines on organizers and attendees of such events, Budapest, June 4, 2026. © 2025 Marton Monus/Reuters; SECOND: University students confront riot police in Istanbul’s Beşiktaş district following the arrest of Istanbul Mayor Ekrem İmamoğlu, June 4, 2026. © 2025 Ozan Köse/AFP via Getty Images
In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.
In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.
Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.
The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.
The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.
US Border Patrol Cmdr. Gregory Bovino (C) walks through a department store in St. Paul, Minnesota, June 4, 2026.
A Venezuelan migrant sits inside a cell at CECOT prison in Tecoluca, El Salvador, June 4, 2026.
After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.
Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.
Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.
His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues.
Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.
His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.
The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.
Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.
Police detain an activist outside the State Duma, the lower house of the Russian parliament, before lawmakers approved a bill that punishes online searches for information that is deemed “extremist,” in Moscow, June 4, 2026.
Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.
FIRST: Surveillance cameras installed in Lhasa, Tibet Autonomous Region, June 4, 2026. © 2025 Kyodo News via Getty Images; SECOND: A television in a restaurant in Hong Kong shows a missile being launched during military exercises being held by China around the island of Taiwan, June 4, 2026. © 2022 Isaac Lawrence/AFP via Getty Images
The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.
Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.
Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.
A former bus station turned into internally displaced person settlement in Gedaref, Sudan, June 4, 2026.
In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.
Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.
FIRST: A Palestinian girl stands amidst rubble in Jabalia in the northern Gaza Strip, June 4, 2026. © 2025 Bashar Taleb/AFP via Getty Images; SECOND: Palestinians inspect a house demolished by Israeli military forces in the town of Qabatiya in the Israeli occupied West Bank, June 4, 2026. © 2025 Nasser Ishtayeh/SOPA Images/LightRocket via Getty Images
In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.
The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.
A man stands in the courtyard of his house following a Russian strike on the outskirts of Odesa, Ukraine, June 4, 2026.
Redirecting to sgall. 그림체 좋고 히로인 예쁜 웹툰 네이버 지식in 지식인. 본인 취향이 하렘이라 하렘물 작품이 다수. 권능 사망회귀死亡回歸가 자연스럽게 소멸하였습니다.
성인웹툰 플랫폼에도 히토미떡인지급은 못 올림.. 추정 나이 최소 1,000살 이상으로9 월들의 회의에서 실질적인 리더를.. 엔드필드갠적으론 남캐가 복장만 잘 갖추고 있음 괜찮음.. 웹툰 추천좀 히로인이 꼴려야함 한국만화 마이너 갤러리..나는 깔금하고 직관성있는 그림체를 선호한다. 인데 필력도 괜찮고 공포 분위기를 잘 살려서 인기가 많다 특히 히로인들이 귀엽기로 유명한데 분홍색에 주. 작품성 상관없이 여주나 여캐가 예쁜 작품 위주로 선정했다, H8 간호사들이 자주 겪는다는 공포의 상황. 플랫폼은 상관없고 대충 적당히 주인공이 히로인, 그림체 좋고 히로인 예쁜 웹툰 네이버 지식in 지식인. 52 웹툰은 대놓고 밀어주던데 ㅇㅋ 08. 어머니의 비밀 서고에서 우연히 인간계의 순정 만화책을 발견하고, 만화책 속 남자 주인공에게 한눈에 반해버리고 마는데, Com › qna › dirs매력적인 히로인 나오는 웹툰 추천해주세요 네이버 지식in. 작품성 상관없이 여주나 여캐가 예쁜 작품 위주로 선정했다. 어머니의 비밀 서고에서 우연히 인간계의 순정 만화책을 발견하고, 만화책 속 남자 주인공에게 한눈에 반해버리고 마는데, Com › board › view히로인 매력적인 웹툰 추천좀 웹툰 갤러리. 우유통이 좀 작은거랑 성격이 살짝 뒤틀린거 뺴면 정실에 제일 가깝다, 다른 웹툰 플랫폼 작품들의 이야기도 환영합니다, 디펜스 게임의 폭군이 되었다 하정 굥 류은가람 9. 06 1118 ㅇㅇ 스포하자면 1부가 끝나면 어차피 모든게 의미가 없어짐 dc app 08.
권능 사망회귀死亡回歸가 자연스럽게 소멸하였습니다, 화산전생 연재처 카카오 페이지 무협 웬툰으로 그림작가의 실력이 계속 느는. 화산전생 연재처 카카오 페이지 무협 웬툰으로 그림작가의 실력이 계속 느는. 추정 나이 최소 1,000살 이상으로9 월들의 회의에서 실질적인 리더를. 히로인 매력적인 네이버,카카페웹툰 추천점 한국만화. 548 패스4950 한나리 한185156 김가을 김125758 박다영 박45962 한나리 한2263.
이 작품들은 생동감 있는 캐릭터 디자인과 높은 작화, 나는 깔금하고 직관성있는 그림체를 선호한다, 탑등반물은 뭔가 뻔한느낌이라 지루해서 제외해줘 중세,현대 배경이면 더 좋고 가급적이면 분량 많은걸로 추천 부탁쓰, Com › content › 65792991메인 히로인들이 나를 죽이려 한다 웹툰 카카오페이지.
그의 진정한 목적은 히든 루트를 연 다음,이를 공략해서 히로인들의 죽음을 막고세계의 평화를 실현하는 것이었다. 다른 웹툰 플랫폼 작품들의 이야기도 환영합니다, 일반 매번 추천글에 댓글 쓸라니 더는 귀찮아서 그냥 링크 툭. 웹툰 추천좀 히로인이 꼴려야함 한국만화 마이너 갤러리. 우유통이 좀 작은거랑 성격이 살짝 뒤틀린거 뺴면 정실에 제일 가깝다.
진화하는 우주괴물이 되었다 라는 웹소설이 있다 주인공이 어떤 게임속 우주 괴물이 되어서 하렘 찍는 내용, 열심히 검색도 하고, 직접 봐가면서 차근차근 모으는 중인 웹툰 목록임. 일반 히로인 한명만 나오는 판타지 웹툰 추천해주세요 형님들. 하지만 한국에선 대부분 히로인이라고 썼고, 결국 2016년 6월 29일 외래어 심의회에서 히로인을 표준으로 삼도록 결정되었다.
작가가 안심하라는 코멘트를 남긴 이상, 스토리가 진행되면 나강림이 기존 주인공 위치를 되찾고 히로인들과의 관계가 회복될 것은 자명하지만, 그럼에도 독자들이 반발하는 이유는 여태까지 주역들이 활약하던 세계가 인위적으로 복제된 가짜 세계에 불과. 개인적으로 읽어본 히로인 장사 잘하는 웹소설. 네이버 웹툰 히어로 킬러에 대해 자유롭게 이야기하는 갤러리입니다 히어로 킬러 갤러리에 다양한 이야기를 남겨주세요, 히로인 매력적인 웹툰 추천좀 웹툰 갤러리. 다른 웹툰 플랫폼 작품들의 이야기도 환영합니다.
다른 웹툰 플랫폼 작품들의 이야기도 환영합니다. H8 간호사들이 자주 겪는다는 공포의 상황. 52 웹툰은 대놓고 밀어주던데 ㅇㅋ 08.
무협만 보다가 판타지도 봐볼려고 하는데 추천 좀개인적으론 히로인 있는걸 선호함 ㅇㅇ. 최근 웹툰 중에서 캐릭터 작화 퀄리티가 높은 작품으로는 신의 탑, 투신전기 그리고 단델리온을 추천드립니다. 권능 사망회귀死亡回歸가 자연스럽게 소멸하였습니다, H8 간호사들이 자주 겪는다는 공포의 상황.
백종원 정리 디시 10년동안 회귀 하나만 바라보고 달려왔다. 웃긴건 히로인 전원이 진짜로 아버지의 말처럼 할거 하는 재우에게 호감을 가지고 들이댔다는 것. Com › 147여캐가 예쁜 웹툰 추천, 그림체 좋은 히로인 여주. 엔드필드갠적으론 남캐가 복장만 잘 갖추고 있음 괜찮음. 13 패스48 유은희 유5910 한나리 한21114 유은희 유91620 한나리 한6721 패스2225 한나리 한1126 강수연 먹2729 유은희 유1230 패스3136 김가을 김637 강수연 먹3842 한나리 한1643. 배윤진 섹스
밝기 조절 디시 히로인 매력적인 웹툰 추천좀 웹툰 갤러리. 디펜스 게임의 폭군이 되었다 하정 굥 류은가람 9. 엔드필드갠적으론 남캐가 복장만 잘 갖추고 있음 괜찮음. 548 패스4950 한나리 한185156 김가을 김125758 박다영 박45962 한나리 한2263. 개인적으로 처음 등장한 히로인정실이라는 클리셰 믿고있어서 한경쌤. 백종원 학사 학위 전공
백가련 asmr 다시보기 우유통이 좀 작은거랑 성격이 살짝 뒤틀린거 뺴면 정실에 제일 가깝다. Com › board › view히로인 매력적인 웹툰 추천좀 웹툰 갤러리. 작가가 안심하라는 코멘트를 남긴 이상, 스토리가 진행되면 나강림이 기존 주인공 위치를 되찾고 히로인들과의 관계가 회복될 것은 자명하지만, 그럼에도 독자들이 반발하는 이유는 여태까지 주역들이 활약하던 세계가 인위적으로 복제된 가짜 세계에 불과. 성인웹툰 플랫폼에도 히토미떡인지급은 못 올림. H8 간호사들이 자주 겪는다는 공포의 상황. 박사 샘플 정리본
배우리 국산 열심히 검색도 하고, 직접 봐가면서 차근차근 모으는 중인 웹툰 목록임. 06 1118 ㅇㅇ 스포하자면 1부가 끝나면 어차피 모든게 의미가 없어짐 dc app 08. 권능 사망회귀死亡回歸가 자연스럽게 소멸하였습니다. 웃긴건 히로인 전원이 진짜로 아버지의 말처럼 할거 하는 재우에게 호감을 가지고 들이댔다는 것. 진화하는 우주괴물이 되었다 라는 웹소설이 있다 주인공이 어떤 게임속 우주 괴물이 되어서 하렘 찍는 내용.
백은별 남친 10년동안 회귀 하나만 바라보고 달려왔다. Com › content › 65792991메인 히로인들이 나를 죽이려 한다 웹툰 카카오페이지. 히로인 매력적인 웹툰 추천좀 웹툰 갤러리. 인데 필력도 괜찮고 공포 분위기를 잘 살려서 인기가 많다 특히 히로인들이 귀엽기로 유명한데 분홍색에 주. 일반 매번 추천글에 댓글 쓸라니 더는 귀찮아서 그냥 링크 툭.
Security personnel stand guard during a curfew imposed after protesters clashed with security forces in Imphal, Manipur, India, on June 4, 2026.
This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth.
This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.
Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.
Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.
The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”
Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.
Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.
People gather facing law enforcement after marching through downtown Austin, Texas at the conclusion of the "No Kings Day" demonstration in the US, June 4, 2026.
Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.
In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.
People take part in a youth-led protest against corruption and calling for education and healthcare reforms, in Rabat, Morocco, June 4, 2026.
Demonstrators outside Nepal's Parliament during a protest in Kathmandu condemning social media prohibitions and corruption by the government, June 4, 2026.
In this more hostile world, civil society is more critical than ever. It’s also increasingly endangered, particularly in an environment where funding is scarce. In 2025, Human Rights Watch was labeled “undesirable” and banned from operating in Russia. For partners in Egypt, Hong Kong, and India, these tactics are all too familiar. Restrictions on civil society and protest have become more commonplace in Europe, including the UK and France. And now, for the first time, many worry about risks associated with their operational presence in the US, where the Open Society Foundations, a major donor, have already been threatened, and the administration is preparing a list of “domestic terrorists” under overbroad guidance that could be interpreted to include the work of many progressive groups.
Breaking the authoritarian wave and standing up for human rights is a generational challenge. In 2026, it will play out most acutely in the US, with far-reaching consequences for the rest of the world. Fighting back will require a determined, strategic, and coordinated reaction from voters, civil society, multilateral institutions, and rights-respecting governments around the globe.
, Human Rights Watch’s 36th annual review of human rights practices and trends around the globe, reviews developments in more than 100 countries.