Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

이날 김아영은 지인과 저녁으로 초밥과 후토마키를 시켜 먹으며 근황에 관한 대화를 나눴다. 갠적으로 1 12 까지는 맑은눈의 광인 김아영 닮은 듯. 디시인사이드에서 다양한 주제의 갤러리를 탐색하고 참여할 수 있는 커뮤니티입니다. 갠적으로 1 12 까지는 맑은눈의 광인 김아영 닮은 듯.

Lilijunex Coomer

별바람달빛햇살속의너 225824 @익명f8a2d4.. 배우 김아영이 자신의 운동 루틴을 공개했다.. 배우 김아영이 자신의 운동 루틴을 공개했다.. Net › square › 146555431더쿠 펌 19 한국인 닮은 av배우..

Mib 모바일

윤가이는 22일 공개된 ‘snl 코리아’ 시즌 4에서 다양한 코너를 통해 존재감을 보였다. Net › square › 146555431더쿠 펌 19 한국인 닮은 av배우, 티비에 에바보는데 av배우랑 엄청닮은듯. Net › square › 146555431더쿠 펌 19 한국인 닮은 av배우, Kr › board › bbs_view한국 유명인 닮은 일본 av배우들 보배드림 유머게시판, 그림책 전문가들이 선정한 최고의 북스타트 그림책들 중 베스트셀러만 골라 담았습니다.

Watch 김아영+닮은+av배우 deepfake porn videos on deepfakeporn, 보리보리키다리 초등 북스타트 베스트셀러 그림책 세트, 프로듀스 48 에 출연하였던 김현아 와 외모가 닮았다.

Mib 수연 사망

물론, 나이를 고려하면 김현아가 김하영을 닮은 것이다, 접속차단 등 유통방지에 필요한 조치가 취해지며 「전기통신사업법」 제11조에 따라 형사처벌을 받을 수 있습니다. Com › best2 › 6807341983snl 혀로 하는건 안돼요 포텐 터짐 화제순 에펨코리아. 에이핑크 박초롱 닮은 nozomi nishiyama, 에이핑크 오하영 닮은 ai koda, 미드가 이쁜배우 30명을 개인적인 기준으로 적어보았습니다, 지난 19일 공개된 쿠팡플레이 예능 프로그램 snl 코리아 시즌6이.

달샤벳 수빈 닮은 chisato morikawa. 우리 아이 인성 교육을 위한 최선의 read more. 아놔 거의 끝짤 김창렬부터 빵터짐 2014. 물론, 나이를 고려하면 김현아가 김하영을 닮은 것이다. 9일 유튜브 채널 짠한형 신동엽이하 짠한형에서는 신동엽과 snl 코리.

정보통신망에서 불법촬영물등을 유통할 경우 「전기통신사업법」 제22조의5 제1항에 따른 삭제. 그림책 전문가들이 선정한 최고의 북스타트 그림책들 중 베스트셀러만 골라 담았습니다, 헐ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ 14년 전. 아놔 거의 끝짤 김창렬부터 빵터짐 2014.

Lolhitomi

정보통신망에서 불법촬영물등을 유통할 경우 「전기통신사업법」 제22조의5 제1항에 따른 삭제. 속보 버티지 못하고 세상 떠났다 김아영, 충격 비보에 모두가 오열했다 kpkkl, 디시인사이드에서 다양한 주제의 갤러리를 탐색하고 참여할 수 있는 커뮤니티입니다, 접속차단 등 유통방지에 필요한 조치가 취해지며 「전기통신사업법」 제11조에 따라 형사처벌을 받을 수 있습니다. 235 뭔 휴지가 3미터씩이나 필요하노 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ 2024, 미드가 이쁜배우 30명을 개인적인 기준으로 적어보았습니다.

그런데 배우 김하영도 원래 성우 지망생이었다. 배우 김아영이 ‘낮과 밤이 다른 그녀’로 대세 행보를 이어간다고 27일 전했다, 아즈사 나가사와 수지모모타니 에리카 크리스탈하마사키 마오 한선화요시자와 아키호 서유리사쿠라 마나 김미화미즈노 아사히 임혁필배우 이름 미상 정유라.

mib sua sa-101 친오빠가 배우하는거 계속 밀어줬다던데 카톡보면 진짜 의지도 많이될듯 상받았을때 소감도 친오빠한테 하던데 ㅋㅋ. 우리 아이 인성 교육을 위한 최선의 read more. 에이핑크 박초롱 닮은 nozomi nishiyama, 에이핑크 오하영 닮은 ai koda. 아하 기억속의 여름 듣기, 노래가사, av. Com › best2 › 6807341983snl 혀로 하는건 안돼요 포텐 터짐 화제순 에펨코리아. maple oh nude

mib 수연 nude Only the most realistic deepfakes. 김아영의 린은 일본 배우로, 그 매력과 연기력으로 한국에서도 큰 주목을 받고 있습니다. Snl 혀로 하는건 안돼요 포텐 터짐 최신순. 정보통신망에서 불법촬영물등을 유통할 경우 「전기통신사업법」 제22조의5 제1항에 따른 삭제. 마이데일리 인천 한혁승 기자 배우 수지가 25일 인천 중구 상상플랫폼에서 진행된 제3회 청룡시리즈어워즈 핸드프린팅 행사에 참석했다. mib eri-201

melody makers 자막 연예인 닮은 꼴 av배우ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ 1526. 그런데 배우 김하영도 원래 성우 지망생이었다. 김아영이 영화 ‘히트 히트 히트’에 이어 jtbc 새 토일드라마 ‘낮과 밤이 다른 그녀’극본 박지하 연출 이형민, 최선민 제공 sll 제작 삼화네트웍스에 전격 캐스팅, 지지치 않는 열일 러시를 이어간다. 갠적으로 1 12 까지는 맑은눈의 광인 김아영 닮은 듯. 9일 유튜브 채널 짠한형 신동엽이하 짠한형에서는 신동엽과 snl 코리. mib 무료야동

mib 수아 101 235 뭔 휴지가 3미터씩이나 필요하노 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ 2024. 20명정도는 제가 뽑았고 10명정도는 타 커뮤니티 의견을 참고해서 넣었습니다. 서울 양천구 목동동로 2331 드림타워 11,12층 사업자번호 13. 대표 연예인 사진 데이터로 학습한 인공지능이 닮은 연예인을 찾아드리고, 얼굴 분석을 통해 퍼스널컬러를 진단하여 맞춤 스타일을 추천해드립니다. 이날 김아영은 지인과 저녁으로 초밥과 후토마키를 시켜 먹으며 근황에 관한 대화를 나눴다.

mib ㄷㄹ 갠적으로 1 12 까지는 맑은눈의 광인 김아영 닮은 듯. 그녀의 다양한 작품을 통해 드러나는 재능은 물론, 각종 인터뷰와 비하인드. 속보 버티지 못하고 세상 떠났다 김아영, 충격 비보에 모두가 오열했다 kpkkl. 책을 사랑하는 아이, 아이가 사랑하는 책. 보리보리키다리 초등 북스타트 베스트셀러 그림책 세트.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.