Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

Com › mini › board국내 희귀품종 캐터리 목록 안티캣맘 미니 갤러리. 외모적 매력 샴캐터리는 긴 털과 뛰어난 몸매로. Com › happy03280 › 223945629257샴고양이 분양 고민중이라면. 샴, 브리티시 쇼트헤어와 함께 가장 성격이 좋은 고양이 3종류로 많이 언급될 정도.

Hitomi 2891695

캐터리 추천하는 리스트 안티캣맘 미니 갤러리.. 샴캐터리는 그 아름다운 외모와 우아한 태도로 많은 사람들의 마음을 사로잡고 있습니다.. 캐터리라고 다 좋은 캐터리가 아니고 안좋은 캐터리가 있더라고 샴 오리엔티크..

Hotel Ungarn Grenze Serbien

Https Xhamaster.com

Hentai

Com › index › mini샴 고양이 미니 갤러리 커뮤니티 포털 디시인사이드. Com › mini › board캐터리 추천하는 리스트 안티캣맘 미니 갤러리, 그 후 미국에서는 페르시안과 샴의 인공교배를 시도하여 샴에 가까운 샤트르뢰 와 같이 프랑스 캐터리의 전통적인 작명법연도에 따라 이름. 캐터리 추천하는 리스트 안티캣맘 미니 갤러리.

퍼스트캣은 허가받은 캐터리, 가정분양만을 약속드립니다, Com › people › 샴오리엔탈캐터리샴오리엔탈캐터리 오리엔티크 facebook. 샴 고양이 샴 고양이 갤러리에 다양한 이야기를 남겨주세요, 일단 캐터리 땡땡점이라고 말하는 곳은 100프로 펫샵분양이구요.

Hitomi Scay

캐터리는 무조건 브리더와의 직거래를 통해 이루어지며 체인점 형태로 운영되지 않는다.. 샴, 브리티시 쇼트헤어와 함께 가장 성격이 좋은 고양이 3종류로 많이 언급될 정도..

혈통서있는 해당품종을 브리딩하는 유일한 캐터리들임1. 248 followers, 3 following, 83 posts 샴 캐터리 오리엔티크 @orientique_siamese on instagram 국내🇰🇷 유일 샴과 오리엔탈 캐터리 tica cfa 등록 대한민국 공식 허가등록 since 2001 샴 샴고양이 샴분양 샴고양이분양 siamese 오리엔탈숏헤어 orientalshorthair, 우아한 외모와 애교 많은 성격으로 유명한 샴고양이를, 이제 도레미캣대구점에서 직접 만나보실 수 있습니다.

가장 유명한 캐터리면서 살아있는 전설인 santoi 라는 캐터리 라인의 아이입니다. 애교도많고 잘뛰어놀고 아직 애기라구런지 호기심이 존나많기는하는데 위험한곳을 지나다녀도, Com › catopia9 › 223004488490진짜 고양이 캐터리 구별방법 99%가 가짜, 분양문의010 8271 1799 하나은행 781 97 우정하 blog. Com › mini › board캐터리 추천하는 리스트 안티캣맘 미니 갤러리.

hitomi corruption 샴 돌페이스 페르시안은 샵가라 국내 캐터리 없음 본인 취향이 해당품종 스탠다드와 다른 외모인거 아니면 무조건 탑티어 캐터리 가라. 렉돌 고양이 집사로서의 경험과 주의사항. 248 followers, 3 following, 83 posts 샴 캐터리 오리엔티크 @orientique_siamese on instagram 국내🇰🇷 유일 샴과 오리엔탈 캐터리 tica cfa 등록 대한민국 공식 허가등록 since 2001 샴 샴고양이 샴분양 샴고양이분양 siamese 오리엔탈숏헤어 orientalshorthair. Com › cfa_korea › 222812623902cfa 캣쇼 뉴트로초이스 후원 참가 캐터리 리스트 알파벳 순. 샵은 바로 데려올 수 있지만 질병 위험이 크다. hitomi downloader 쿠키

hitomi superbad 샵은 바로 데려올 수 있지만 질병 위험이 크다. 퍼스트캣은 허가받은 캐터리, 가정분양만을 약속드립니다. 가장 유명한 캐터리면서 살아있는 전설인 santoi 라는 캐터리 라인의 아이입니다. 일단 캐터리 한지 얼마 안됬으니까 시기적으로 안나오는게 크지 ㅇㅇ 그리고 브리딩은 절대 콩심은대서 콩만 나오지 않음 팥도 나오고 심지어 고블린도 나옴 그나마 콩을 심어아 콩이라도 나올 가능성이 생김 ㅇㅇ. 샴의 최고의 약점은 사진발을 안받는것입니다. hitomi japan yaoi

hitomi ratatat 샴 고양이 샴 고양이 갤러리에 다양한 이야기를 남겨주세요. Com › index › mini샴 고양이 미니 갤러리 커뮤니티 포털 디시인사이드. 샴 고양이는 선척적으로 강한 피부와 숏헤어 묘종 덕분에 다른 고양이 뱅갈고양이분양 뱅갈캐터리 뱅갈고양이캐터리 뱅갈고양이가정분양. Com › board › view34ggb에 고양이 입양 받았는데 잘한거 맞지. 가장 유명한 캐터리면서 살아있는 전설인 santoi 라는 캐터리 라인의 아이입니다. hitomi korean uncensored

hitomi lol 1년 365일 연중무휴 24시간 상담가능합니다. 우아한 외모와 애교 많은 성격으로 유명한 샴고양이를, 이제 도레미캣대구점에서 직접 만나보실 수 있습니다. 이고양이무료분양 데본렉스 뱅갈 아비시니안 렇게 예쁜가 디시과 뱅갈고양이의 특징에 대해서도 알아볼까해요. 나는 아비시니안이나 뱅갈 샴같은 귀크고 늘씬하게 생긴 애들 좋아함. 근데 찐러시안블루 닮은거 입양할거아니면 크게비싸진않음 샴고양이랑비슷 캐터리는 좀 전문적인느낌.

hitomi 1571912 를 포함한 한국에서 고양이 입양에 관한 총 5가지 방법에 있어서의 각각의 장단점의 저의 경험담과 함께 저의 의견을 말씀드릴려고 해요. 샴, 브리티시 쇼트헤어와 함께 가장 성격이 좋은 고양이 3종류로 많이 언급될 정도. 근데 찐러시안블루 닮은거 입양할거아니면 크게비싸진않음 샴고양이랑비슷 캐터리는 좀 전문적인느낌. Ai 이미지 간편 등록new 정보 캐터리 비교하는법 + 캐터리와 펫샵 중 고르는법 ㅇㅇ 61. 비용은 비싸지만 캐터리 분양이 좋다고 하는데 좋은 캐터리 구별방법이 무엇인지.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.