Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

포우사다 샬 다 몬탄하의 편의시설 실외 수영장 사우나 게임룸 당구대 무료 와이파이 전용 욕실 테라스파티오 발코니. 무실동 한우구이전문점 원주우화 다녀왔어요 무실동에 프라이빗한 공간이 새로 생겼더라구요 츠동이 생일이라 점심으로 한우 먹으러왔어요 힣 인스타에서 5만원 이벤트 당첨되었는데 점심특선 2인메뉴는 99,000원이더라구요 나머지 금액은 내돈내산했습니다. 편도 flightslowestpriceow, 왕복 flightslowestprice. 수도권과 가까운 위치와 국토 중부에 자리한 지리적 이점 덕분에 인구는 지속적으로 증가해 왔으며, 영동고속도로 광주원주고속도로 중앙고속도로 가 통과하는 교통의 요지이자 원주기업도시 와 혁신도시 유치 등의 영향으로 지역 발전이 가속화되고 있다.

Laurus0711

Kuzu 에펨코리아

고급형 호텔, 빌라 플로레스타 노바에 위치 포우사다 마리아 플로르 노로냐에서는 무료 풀 브렉퍼스트 아침 식사, 정원, 야외 엔터테인먼트 구역 등을 이용하실 수, 또한, 이 인여관에서는 아침 식사, wifi 이용이 무료. 살바도르의 포우사다 바히아 펠로 후기, 가격, 위치 호텔 예약. 원주 3대 통닭은 남부통닭, 풍전 통닭, 원주 옛날통닭입니다. Kayak에서 지조카 데 제리코아코아라세아라 내 포우사다 빌라 카주 베스트 상품의 가격을 비교하고 바로 예약하세요.

Kuzu 시리즈

살바도르의 출장 여행에 좋은 포우사다입니다. 편도 flightslowestpriceow, 왕복 flightslowestprice. 일산동, 단구동에도 있는데 이 두 지점은 배달, 포장 전문점이라고 되어 있다, Rio grande do norte state사오 미구엘 도 고스토조 브라질.

프리미엄 호텔 최저가 소식을 알려 드릴게요, 고급형 호텔, 빌라 플로레스타 노바에 위치 포우사다 마리아 플로르 노로냐에서는 무료 풀 브렉퍼스트 아침 식사, 정원, 야외 엔터테인먼트 구역 등을 이용하실 수. 📣 원주시 sns 서포터즈 2023년 원주 원주여행. 마음에 드는 강원 포우사다, 익스피디아에서 예약하세요. 새로 오픈한지 그리 오래되지는 않았다는 원주 혁신도시의 덕수파스타 이게 원주에 지점이 3개가 있나보다. 수도권과 가까운 위치와 국토 중부에 자리한 지리적 이점 덕분에 인구는 지속적으로 증가해 왔으며, 영동고속도로 광주원주고속도로 중앙고속도로 가 통과하는 교통의 요지이자 원주기업도시 와 혁신도시 유치 등의 영향으로 지역 발전이 가속화되고 있다.

Lanlansnowhare

또한, 이 인여관에서는 아침 식사, wifi 이용이 무료, 실시간 최저가 97637520원부터 시작합니다, 바삭하게 튀겨서 고소함과 함께 튀김옷의 식감이 푹신한 것이 특징.

또 다시 원주에 비즈니스가 아닌 맘편히 놀러간다면 또 방문해야지 영복형님 잘 먹었습니다 ㅋㅋㅋ+_+ 강원도 원주 파스타맛집 보헤미안 댓글3공유하기. 원주에서 3대통닭 중에 가장 인기가 많은 곳입니다. 바삭하게 튀겨서 고소함과 함께 튀김옷의 식감이 푹신한 것이 특징, 실시간 최저가 97637520원부터 시작합니다.

또 다시 원주에 비즈니스가 아닌 맘편히 놀러간다면 또 방문해야지 영복형님 잘 먹었습니다 ㅋㅋㅋ+_+ 강원도 원주 파스타맛집 보헤미안 댓글3공유하기. 일산동, 단구동에도 있는데 이 두 지점은 배달, 포장 전문점이라고 되어 있다, 피레노폴리스에 위치한 포우사다 선플라워의 경우 차로 15분 이내 거리에 중앙 브라질 그리스도 재림 연구소 및 산타 바르바라 힐 등이 있습니다. 포우사다 샬 다 몬탄하의 편의시설 실외 수영장 사우나 게임룸 당구대 무료 와이파이 전용 욕실 테라스파티오 발코니, Balneario camboriu 마르 호텔. 살바도르의 출장 여행에 좋은 포우사다입니다.

Kuzu 168

원주 들리거나 원주 맛집 검색하시는 분들께 추천하고 싶은 맛집 베스트 였습니다.. Rio grande do norte state사오 미구엘 도 고스토조 브라질..

포우사다 선플라워 사진, 예약, 후기 pirenópolis pina nol. 돈까스 뷔페가 원주기업도시에 오픈했어요, 포우사다 카핌 아수의 특가 상품을 확인해 보세요. 나물밥은 꼭 함께 드시길 강력 추천합니다.

kuzu 120 원주 3대 통닭은 남부통닭, 풍전 통닭, 원주 옛날통닭입니다. 포우사다 카핌 아수의 특가 상품을 확인해 보세요. 플람보이얀트 광장에서 매우 가깝다는 지리적 이점도 있어요. 📣 원주시 sns 서포터즈 2023년 원주 원주여행. 무실동 한우구이전문점 원주우화 다녀왔어요 무실동에 프라이빗한 공간이 새로 생겼더라구요 츠동이 생일이라 점심으로 한우 먹으러왔어요 힣 인스타에서 5만원 이벤트 당첨되었는데 점심특선 2인메뉴는 99,000원이더라구요 나머지 금액은 내돈내산했습니다. korean bj 18

kuzu110 포우사다 샬 다 몬탄하의 편의시설 실외 수영장 사우나 게임룸 당구대 무료 와이파이 전용 욕실 테라스파티오 발코니. 살바도르의 포우사다 바히아 펠로 후기, 가격, 위치 호텔 예약. 살바도르의 출장 여행에 좋은 포우사다입니다. 또 다시 원주에 비즈니스가 아닌 맘편히 놀러간다면 또 방문해야지 영복형님 잘 먹었습니다 ㅋㅋㅋ+_+ 강원도 원주 파스타맛집 보헤미안 댓글3공유하기. 원주인들이 추천하는 현지인 맛집 리스트 인데요 20곳으로 압축하는게 쉽지 않네요. lalameimeimei leak

landman 온라인 무료 나물밥은 꼭 함께 드시길 강력 추천합니다. 고급형 호텔, 빌라 플로레스타 노바에 위치 포우사다 마리아 플로르 노로냐에서는 무료 풀 브렉퍼스트 아침 식사, 정원, 야외 엔터테인먼트 구역 등을 이용하실 수. 돈까스 뷔페가 원주기업도시에 오픈했어요. 포우사다 샬 다 몬탄하의 편의시설 실외 수영장 사우나 게임룸 당구대 무료 와이파이 전용 욕실 테라스파티오 발코니. 실시간으로 저렴한 항공권 가격 비교부터 즉시. kuzu_v0 108

ktx 암표 사이트 프리미엄 호텔 최저가 소식을 알려 드릴게요. 원주인들이 추천하는 현지인 맛집 리스트 인데요 20곳으로 압축하는게 쉽지 않네요. 플람보이얀트 광장에서 매우 가깝다는 지리적 이점도 있어요. 원주에서 3대통닭 중에 가장 인기가 많은 곳입니다. 포우사다 카핌 아수 페르난두데누로냐 근처 호텔 추천.

lck 치지직 디시 수도권과 가까운 위치와 국토 중부에 자리한 지리적 이점 덕분에 인구는 지속적으로 증가해 왔으며, 영동고속도로 광주원주고속도로 중앙고속도로 가 통과하는 교통의 요지이자 원주기업도시 와 혁신도시 유치 등의 영향으로 지역 발전이 가속화되고 있다. 원주 3대 통닭은 남부통닭, 풍전 통닭, 원주 옛날통닭입니다. 포우사다 카핌 아수 페르난두데누로냐 근처 호텔 추천. 또 다시 원주에 비즈니스가 아닌 맘편히 놀러간다면 또 방문해야지 영복형님 잘 먹었습니다 ㅋㅋㅋ+_+ 강원도 원주 파스타맛집 보헤미안 댓글3공유하기. 포우사다 카핌 아수의 특가 상품을 확인해 보세요.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.